Skip to main content

Why are India's ruling politicians, top supporters 'avoiding' vaccinated first?

Baba Ramdev with Shivraj Singh Chauhan 
By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*
After the Government of India approved two vaccines, the Indian version of Oxford’s AstraZeneca, Covishield, launched by the Serum Institute, and Bharat Biotech’s Covaxin, developed with the help of the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), a section of media has gone overboard to launch pro-government propaganda after it was alleged that Covaxin was approval bypassing procedures and norms.
The data of phase three trials for the Bharat Biotech vaccine have not yet been made public, nor has there been any peer review of the entire exercise. Revealing this, one of India’s top vaccine scientists, Prof Gagandeep Kang, questioning the approval, asserted, while she was ready to volunteer for a vaccine trial, she won’t like to be vaccinated with the Bharat Biotech vaccine.
In an interview with Karan Thapar for “The Wire”, Prof Kang said, without efficacy data no vaccine should be cleared, underlining, the clearance was given to Bharat Biotech’s Covaxin without on a wrong premise. She added, she found the limited approval given to the Bharat Biotech vaccine without Phase 3 trial efficacy was “extremely confusing”.
There was no reaction to this among government circles. But BJP IT cell and ministers started targeting Akhilesh Yadav, when the Samajwadi Party president said, though he had full confidence in the Indian doctors and scientists, he was not going to get ‘vaccinated’ by the BJP’s political vaccine. Yadav was questioning the way the government had rushed to give clearance to the Bharat Biotech vaccine, along with Oxford’s AstraZeneca.
It is difficult to understand why Yadav was being targeted. He had just questioned the entire process of approval and the way public health crisis was allowed to be escalated. Political parties have the duty to raise questions, as what happened was related to public health safety. The government technically represents the people’s will, as it it elected by people. But at the same point of time opposition is duty bound to remind the government about its failure.
Meanwhile, Madhya Pradesh chief minister Shivraj Singh Chauhan gave instructions to his administration about the vaccination process to be adopted, and, unsurprisingly, asserted that he won’t get be vaccinated first. “I have decided that I will not be vaccinated for now. First it should be administered to others. My turn should come afterwards. We have to work to ensure that priority groups are administered with the vaccine first”, Chauhan said. 
One can blame Akhilesh Yadav for being ‘political’, but what about Prof Gagandeep Kang? If Yadav is wrong, what about Chauhan, who is refusing to be vaccinated first?
The same day, Baba Ramdev said, he would not take the vaccine as he fully ‘trusted’ yoga. However, he added, people with comorbidities should be given the vaccine first. Ironically, it is the same Ramdev who claimed he had ‘found’ a treatment for coronavirus. If Ramdev had so much of faith in the vaccine, he should opt for the same. But by suggesting that he would not take it and yoga can do the job for him, Ramdev sent a message that those who do yoga wouldn’t be infected!
Prof Gagandeep Kang
How would the Indian political class ensure that people have faith in the two vaccines without taking the first dose? Some TV channels have started sending their reporters to be vaccinated, claiming within no time that nothing happened to them. Is this the way to promote a vaccine? Do clinical trials happen when a person starts claiming within 24 hours that ‘nothing’ has happened them? The way India hurriedly approved its vaccination programme is turning out to be an international embarrassment. The “Washington Post” said, “India’s vaccine nationalism is a global risk.”
World over leaders have offered themselves to be vaccinated first to give a boost to the scientific community and build confidence among the people in the vaccination programme. United States president-elect Joe Biden got himself vaccinated on December 20, while vice president Kamala Harris got the vaccination shot on December 29. Three former American presidents Bill Clinton, George Bush and Barack Obama have approached requisite American agencies to be vaccinated live on TV.  
Saudi prince Mohammad Bin Salman was the first to get vaccinated in his country. Russian president Vladimir Putin got his daughter vaccinated first, while British prime minister Boris Johnson is likely to be vaccinated soon. Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has got himself vaccinated first.
In India, we are hearing preaching and publicity. This is not the time to show one’s ‘bravery’ but to build confidence among the people. Haryana minister Anil Vij offered himself for a trial shot of Covaxin by Bharat Biotech, but found himself Covid positive within a few days. He was admitted in Medanta hospital for nearly one month and is now recuperating at home.
The vaccination process has to be simple and without any claims and counterclaims. It is an issue of public safety. Scientists have done their job, health workers have risked their life saving us. But an unfortunate situation has been created after the Bharat Biotech and the Serum Institute publicly challenged each other. No scientist ever says that their work is 110% or 200% risk free. Anyone speaking like this looks like a street vendor who wants to the product at any cost.
Such terminology from senior persons should not have happened. They are only dilute the seriousness of the entire process as well as the vaccines. It is the duty of the government to follow the approval process strictly. We have waited for so long and will wait for more but one must ensure that things are done transparently.
One can blame Akhilesh Yadav for being ‘political’, but what about Prof Kang? If Yadav is wrong, what about Chauhan, who is refusing to be vaccinated first? Indeed, the vaccination process should be beyond party politics. It should be celebrated as victory of science over a dreaded disease. Would good sense prevail?
---
*Human rights defender

Comments

veerar said…
It is Bill Gates' Vaccine Fanaticism objecting all other combinations like HCQ,Zinc compuounds,Vitamin C and D etc, that is the most dangerous and NOT the so-called India's Vaccine Nationalism whatever it means. It is the Western Pharma Cos who benefit by way of HUGE PROFITs by any Vaccination Program,enjoying Immunity against Suits,filed by Victims who suffer paralysis,infertility (STERIKITY),etc and even Death is caused,in some cases as in the recent Vaccines against COVID-19...

TRENDING

Was Netaji forced to alter face, die in obscurity in USSR in 1975? Was he so meek?

  By Rajiv Shah   This should sound almost hilarious. Not only did Subhas Chandra Bose not die in a plane crash in Taipei, nor was he the mysterious Gumnami Baba who reportedly passed away on 16 September 1985 in Ayodhya, but we are now told that he actually died in 1975—date unknown—“in oblivion” somewhere in the former Soviet Union. Which city? Moscow? No one seems to know.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Love letters in a lifelong war: Babusha Kohli’s resistance in verse

By Ravi Ranjan*  “War does not determine who is right—only who is left.” Bertrand Russell’s words echo hauntingly in our times, and few contemporary Hindi poets embody this truth as profoundly as Babusha Kohli. Emerging from Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, Kohli has carved a unique space in literature by weaving together tenderness, protest, and philosophy across poetry, prose, and cinema. Her work is not merely artistic expression—it is resistance, refuge, and a call for peace.

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Rajiv Shah  Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

Asbestos contamination in children’s products highlights global oversight gaps

By A Representative   A commentary published by the International Ban Asbestos Secretariat (IBAS) has drawn attention to the challenges governments face in responding effectively to global public-health risks. In an article written by Laurie Kazan-Allen and published on March 5, 2026, the author examines how the discovery of asbestos contamination in children’s play products has raised questions about regulatory oversight and international product safety. The article opens by reflecting on lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic, noting that governments in several countries were slow to respond to early warning signs of the crisis. Referring to the experience of the United Kingdom, the author writes that delays in implementing protective measures contributed to “232,112 recorded deaths and over a million people suffering from long Covid.” The commentary uses this example to illustrate what it describes as the dangers of underestimating emerging threats. Attention then turns...

India’s green energy push faces talent crunch amidst record growth at 16% CAGR

By Jag Jivan*  A new study by a top consulting firm has found that India’s cleantech sector is entering a decisive growth phase, with strong policy backing, record capacity additions and surging investor interest, but facing mounting pressure on talent supply and rising compensation costs .

The kitchen as prison: A feminist elegy for domestic slavery

By Garima Srivastava* Kumar Ambuj stands as one of the most incisive voices in contemporary Hindi poetry. His work, stripped of ornamentation, speaks directly to the lived realities of India’s marginalized—women, the rural poor, and those crushed under invisible forms of violence. His celebrated poem “Women Who Cook” (Khānā Banātī Striyāṃ) is not merely about food preparation; it is a searing indictment of patriarchal domestic structures that reduce women’s existence to endless, unpaid labour.

The price of silence: Why Modi won’t follow Shastri, appeal for sacrifice

By Arundhati Dhuru, Sandeep Pandey*  ​In 1965, as India grappled with war and a crippling food crisis, Prime Minister Lal Bahadur Shastri faced a United States that used wheat shipments under the PL-480 agreement as a lever to dictate Indian foreign policy. Shastri’s response remains legendary: he appealed to the nation to skip one meal a day. Millions of middle-class households complied, choosing temporary hunger over the sacrifice of national dignity. Today, India faces a modern equivalent in the energy sector, yet the leadership’s response stands in stark contrast to that era of self-reliance.

Beyond sattvik: Purity, caste and the politics of the Indian kitchen

By Rajiv Shah   A few week ago, I was forwarded an article that appeared in the British weekly The Economist . Titled “Caste and cuisine: From honeycomb curry to blood fry: India’s ‘untouchable’ cooking”, it took me back to what I had blogged about what was called a “ sattvik food festival”, an annual event organised by former Indian Institute of Management-Ahmedabad professor Anil Gupta.