Skip to main content

Indian foreign policy failure? China to take advantage of Iran's 'no' to Chabahar project

By Shabir Ahmad*
In a major foreign policy setback for India, Iran has decided to drop India from the strategic Chabahar rail project by citing a delayed funding from Indian side. This strategic railway project in Iran was supposed to be executed by Ircon International Limited, formerly Indian Railway Construction Limited, in association with the Iranian railways.
The construction of this project has been delayed over the past four years. By citing India's delay in funding the project, Iran has decided to drop India from the project and execute it on its own. To understand why this is a major foreign policy setback for India, one needs to understand the strategic significance of the Chabahar port and the Chabahar railway project.
The Chabahar port is located in South-East Iran on its Arabian coast. It occupies a strategic location. It is a strategic choke point through which all the oil shipments from the Persian Gulf enters the Arabian sea. From here, the shipments move on to the Indian Ocean region and the Mediterranean sea.
It is also not without significance that, to the east of Chabahar port, we have the Gwadar port of Pakistan that is located in its Baluchistan province, which is a part of the China–Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC).
Keeping these factors in view, India has desired to establish close connectivity with Afghanistan and central Asian countries, and having access to the Chabahar port is considered very critical for access these countries. Indeed, India enjoys close political and strategic relations with Afghanistan as well as with all central Asian countries. 
These countries are very rich in natural resources, including oil and natural gas, hydro-power, valuable metal, etc. With an eye these resources, India has sought to establish a close trade relationships with them.
A major roadblock for India's ambitions has been lack of connectivity between India and Afghanistan and between India and the central Asian countries. India shares no land border with any of the central Asian countries and with Afghanistan. A small 80 km border with Afghanistan which India claims is part of the Pakistan occupied Kashmir (PoK).
The only land route through which India can connect with these countries passes through Pakistan, but any such land transit corridor that connects India with Afghanistan and central Asian countries is not feasible, because Pakistan would not permit such land based transit connectivity with India. Even if it permits such land corridor, it would be highly vulnerable due to constant political instability between India and Pakistan.
In order to bypass this handicap posed by Pakistan, India came up with the grand and ambitious plan to connect with Afghanistan and central Asian countries via Iran. As a part of this strategy, India has long pursued the development of the strategic Chabahar port and a railway line under a road project that subsequently connects Chabahar port with Afghanistan.
This, it was thought, would allow India to establish maritime connectivity with the Chabahar port through the Arabian sea and then further transfer goods and products through the land route all the way up to Zahedan, which is an Iranian border town located at its borders with Afghanistan. From here, the road and rail corridor will connect with Afghanistan's border town Zaranj, which is already a part of the Zaranj-Daleram Highway that has been constructed by India.
In 2016, India, Iran and Afghanistan signed a tri-lateral agreement to develop the Chabahar port and the Chabahar railway project. Last year, Iran gave operational control over one of the terminals of the Chabahar port, and through this terminal India started trading with Afghanistan. 
India and Afghanistan also established an air corridor in order to facilitate the transportation of perishable goods and other items. But with Iran deciding to drop India from any further involvement in the Chabahar railway project by citing India's inability to fund, things seem to be moving in the reverse gear.
No doubt, recently Pakistan decided to allow Afghanistan to take its exports that are headed towards India via Pakistani territory by making use of integrated check posts that India and Pakistan have established at the Wagah-Attari border. Under a Pakistan-Afghanistan trade agreement, Pakistan is supposed to help and promote Afghan exports.
But in view current hostilities with India, Pakistan would never permit Indian exports that are headed towards Afghanistan and other central Asian countries. Even if it permits Indian exports, that would be highly volatile and vulnerable due to frequent tensions between the two countries. 
Fear of American sanctions pushed India to slow down its funding and as well as its construction activities with regard to Chabahar port and Chabahar railway line
Iran’s decision to drop India out of the Chabahar railway project is seen as related to the ongoing geopolitics involving US, Iran, China and India. Iran has been placed under economic sanctions by the US, which is essentially looking to cripple its nuclear weapons programme. Through these sanctions, the US is looking to squeeze the key sectors of Iranian economy, oil and energy.
Iranian President Hassan Rouhani with Chinese counterpart Xi Jinping
Both India and Iran have not only shared close trade relations but they strategic relations. In fact, India and Iran coordinated with each other in order to stabilise Afghanistan, ripped with extremist violence. However, the close economic and strategic relationship between India and Iran has come under severe pressure due to American sanctions.
When the first set of sanctions were imposed upon Iran by the US, India managed to bypass these by working out an alternative payments system for Iranian oil. This pleased the Iranian government about India's conviction to protect the economic relationship, especially oil imports, from the threat of American sanctions.
But in order to please the US, India decided to back out from the Iran-Pakistan-Iran gas pipeline project. This way, India was trying to strike a balance between the interests of the US and Iran. It was trying to protect its own national interests, especially in its energy security. In return, India tried to reward Iran by allowing greater Indian involvement in the development of the Chabahar port and the Chabahar railway project.
However, recently, the Donald Trump administration decided to walk out of the Iranian nuclear deal, and it decided to reimpose economic sanctions against Iran. Since then, the Trump administration has been exerting pressure on all the countries that import oil from Iran, including India, to zero out their oil imports. This time India succumbed to American pressure. 
It has not only reduced oil imports from Iran. It has almost zeroed out oil imports. Until recently, Iran, which was the top oil supplier for India, has been cut off from exporting to India as a result of American sanctions.
The fear of American sanctions pushed India to slow down its funding and as well as its construction activities with regard to the Chabahar port and the Chabahar railway line. No doubt, India managed to convince the US and gained one-time exemption for the Chabahar railway project. Indian investments and involvement in the port and the railway project were exempted from the threat of American sanctions.
Yet, despite of this exemption, India has failed to execute the project on time, mainly due to technical and logistical delays on the part of India. In the eyes of Iran, India has succumbed the fear of American sanctions – not only has it failed to protect Iran’s trading relations, it has also failed to deliver the committed project on time.
Alongside, Iran has seen India's growing contiguity with the US and Israel with lot of suspicion. Over the last one-and-a-half years, Iran has adopted aggressive and hostile approach towards India, especially in International platforms.
Thus, at the UN and the conferences of Islamic nations, Iran has repeatedly brought up human rights violations by Indian security forces in Jammu and Kashmir (J&K). Iran also sided with Pakistan,
The author
Turkey and Malaysia in criticising India's decision to abrogate Articles 370 and 35A. These factors have pushed Iran closer to China, thus posing a major threat to India's national interests in the region.
Quite like India, China is heavily dependent on oil imports from Iran. In fact, it is one of the top recipients of Iranian oil. Iran and China have come very to close to signing a landmark agreement that involves massive economic and strategic partnership between the two countries. 
As per the agreement, China is expected to invest billions of dollars in the Iranian economy, especially in oil and energy sectors and in the port and infrastructure, which have been hardest hit as the result of the American sanctions.
Since China has the capacity and capability to bypass American sanctions, Iran might be looking to hand over strategic infrastructural projects such as the Chabahar port and the Chabahar railway project to China. This could possibly explain as to why Iran has decided to drop India out of the project. It is not just the Chinese factor which has led to these developments. It is also the result of India's failure to protect its own national interests.
---
*Freelance writer and IAS aspirant from Raiyar Doodhpathri, Jammu and Kashmir

Comments

TRENDING

Whither space for the marginalised in Kerala's privately-driven townships after landslides?

By Ipshita Basu, Sudheesh R.C.  In the early hours of July 30 2024, a landslide in the Wayanad district of Kerala state, India, killed 400 people. The Punjirimattom, Mundakkai, Vellarimala and Chooralmala villages in the Western Ghats mountain range turned into a dystopian rubble of uprooted trees and debris.

Election bells ringing in Nepal: Can ousted premier Oli return to power?

By Nava Thakuria*  Nepal is preparing for a national election necessitated by the collapse of KP Sharma Oli’s government at the height of a Gen Z rebellion (youth uprising) in September 2025. The polls are scheduled for 5 March. The Himalayan nation last conducted a general election in 2022, with the next polls originally due in 2027.  However, following the dissolution of Nepal’s lower house of Parliament last year by President Ram Chandra Poudel, the electoral process began under the patronage of an interim government installed on 12 September under the leadership of retired Supreme Court judge Sushila Karki. The Hindu-majority nation of over 29 million people will witness more than 3,400 electoral candidates, including 390 women, representing 68 political parties as well as independents, vying for 165 seats in the 275-member House of Representatives.

Jayanthi Natarajan "never stood by tribals' rights" in MNC Vedanta's move to mine Niyamigiri Hills in Odisha

By A Representative The Odisha Chapter of the Campaign for Survival and Dignity (CSD), which played a vital role in the struggle for the enactment of historic Forest Rights Act, 2006 has blamed former Union environment minister Jaynaynthi Natarjan for failing to play any vital role to defend the tribals' rights in the forest areas during her tenure under the former UPA government. Countering her recent statement that she rejected environmental clearance to Vendanta, the top UK-based NMC, despite tremendous pressure from her colleagues in Cabinet and huge criticism from industry, and the claim that her decision was “upheld by the Supreme Court”, the CSD said this is simply not true, and actually she "disrespected" FRA.

Gig workers hold online strike on republic day; nationwide protests planned on February 3

By A Representative   Gig and platform service workers across the country observed a nationwide online strike on Republic Day, responding to a call given by the Gig & Platform Service Workers Union (GIPSWU) to protest what it described as exploitation, insecurity and denial of basic worker rights in the platform economy. The union said women gig workers led the January 26 action by switching off their work apps as a mark of protest.

'Condonation of war crimes against women and children’: IPSN on Trump’s Gaza Board

By A Representative   The India-Palestine Solidarity Network (IPSN) has strongly condemned the announcement of a proposed “Board of Peace” for Gaza and Palestine by former US President Donald J. Trump, calling it an initiative that “condones war crimes against children and women” and “rubs salt in Palestinian wounds.”

With infant mortality rate of 5, better than US, guarantee to live is 'alive' in Kerala

By Nabil Abdul Majeed, Nitheesh Narayanan   In 1945, two years prior to India's independence, the current Chief Minister of Kerala, Pinarayi Vijayan, was born into a working-class family in northern Kerala. He was his mother’s fourteenth child; of the thirteen siblings born before him, only two survived. His mother was an agricultural labourer and his father a toddy tapper. They belonged to a downtrodden caste, deemed untouchable under the Indian caste system.

Stands 'exposed': Cavalier attitude towards rushed construction of Char Dham project

By Bharat Dogra*  The nation heaved a big sigh of relief when the 41 workers trapped in the under-construction Silkyara-Barkot tunnel (Uttarkashi district of Uttarakhand) were finally rescued on November 28 after a 17-day rescue effort. All those involved in the rescue effort deserve a big thanks of the entire country. The government deserves appreciation for providing all-round support.

MGNREGA: How caste and power hollowed out India’s largest welfare law

By Sudhir Katiyar, Mallica Patel*  The sudden dismantling of MGNREGA once again exposes the limits of progressive legislation in the absence of transformation of a casteist, semi-feudal rural society. Over two days in the winter session, the Modi government dismantled one of the most progressive legislations of the UPA regime—the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA).

MGNREGA’s limits and the case for a new rural employment framework

By Dr Jayant Kumar*  Rural employment programmes have played a pivotal role in shaping India’s socio-economic landscape . Beyond providing income security to vulnerable households, they have contributed to asset creation, village development, and social stability. However, persistent challenges—such as seasonal unemployment, income volatility, administrative inefficiencies, and corruption—have limited the transformative potential of earlier schemes.