Skip to main content

How political identity of J&K has been 'systematically usurped' by rightist politics

Omar Abdullah, then and now
By Sandeep Pandey*, Rajendran Narayanan**
The decision on August 5, 2019 to abrogate Articles 370 and 35A and division and downgrading of State of Jammu and Kashmir (J&K) into two Union Territories J&K and Ladakh was taken in a most undemocratic manner without consulting a single person of J&K. The State Assembly is not in existence for 18 months now.
There were four occasions when a new government could have been formed but the Union Government did not let it happen. Immediately after the fall of Bhartiya Janata Party-People’s Democractic Party coalition government, PDP, National Conference and Congress Party were willing to come together to form a government.
Governor Satyapal Malik imposed Governor’s rule as a preemptive measure. At the expiry of the six month period elections should have been held. But instead President’s rule was imposed. When the General Elections were being held it was expected the elections to J&K Assembly will also be held along with four other states. But that did not happen.
Finally, the President’s rule was extended for a second six month term in July 2019, instead of holding the elections. In retrospect in appears that it was deliberate ploy. Because if a State Assembly had been in place in J&K then the decisions taken by Union Government would have to have been approved by the Assembly first.
The Governor substituted in lieu of the State Government and recommended amendment in Article 370. However, considering that the Governor was a man from outside the State handpicked by the Union Government, the entire process was a clever manipulation to prevent the participation of any citizen of J&K in the important decision taken about the State.
Most shockingly Dr Farooq Abdullah, a Member of Paliament from J&K, was not allowed to attend the Parliament and the Home Minister lied to the nation that Dr Abdullah was unwell and that he couldn’t bring him to Parliament at gun point. Fact is, Dr Abdullah was under house arrest and police would not let him go out. And that too without any written order.
It was only when the South Indian politician Vaiko filed a habeas corpus in September 2019 for Dr Farooq Abdullah, as he wanted to invite him to an event in Tamil Nadu, that Public Safety Act was invoked against him to prevent him from being released by a Court order.
Omar Abdullah and Mehbooba Mufti, both former Chief Ministers, also continue to be under illegal detention at their homes like a number of other political leaders, including Shah Faesal, who had recently floated a Party.
As if this humiliation was not enough, the Prime Minister and Home Minister have accused three political families of looting the State. While this may be true it is not as if corruption is a J&K specific phenomenon. Several other CMs like Laloo Prasad Yadav, Om Prakash Chautala, Jayalalitha, Madhu Koda and Shibu Soren were jailed or are in jail on corruption charges. 
Even BJP CM B Yeddyurappa has faced corruption charges and at one time was discredited to the extent that BJP distanced itself from him. It appears that this again is a conspiracy to discredit the political leadership of J&K.
Now we hear that the government is planning to release Abdullahs provided they quite politics for a while and possibly move abroad. This is really strange. If they have committed any crime they should be tried and sent to jail like some of the other politicians in country. But removing politicians from the scene altogether who can possibly help revival of electoral politics in state is sinister.
In the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution the Local Government is a subject under the State List, yet Union Government went ahead and got Block Development Council elections conducted which was boycotted by the two major Parties of J&K as well as the Congress Party. This presents a dangerous scenario. The BJP-RSS has been building a ‘One Nation, One Constitution, One Language’ narrative and they may lead us to a situation of One Party rule.
BJP was the only party contesting the Block level elections in J&K. This will be the end of democracy in India. Indian democracy has thrived on a multi-Party system so far. The opposition Parties play an important role of check and balance and also offer an alternative to the people in the next elections if the people are not happy with the ruling Party.
It is strange that while BJP has implemented the longtime political agenda of RSS to abrogate Article 370, it is preventing other political parties to carry out their political activities. Even the Supreme Court, when it has allowed any politician from outside to visit J&K, has put a condition that politicians should not carry out political activities. This is really strange. If the political parties are prevented from carrying out political activities, what else are they supposed to do?
It is strange that the government is arranging trips of foreign envoys to J&K while not allowing own MPs to visit.
With the downgrading of State status to Union Territories, the bureaucracy and military establishment is clearly dominating the politics and the officials don’t feel accountable to the people as a people’s representative would have felt.
Hence in all possible ways the BJP government in power in Delhi is making sure that there is no political alternative in J&K or any voice demanding democratic rights for people. It wants a police or military state in J&K and forces everybody to accept its point of view.
Attempt should be made for a dialogue with Pakistan to reunite the two portions of J&K. A joint management of the united J&K should be worked out
We have been told by BJP politicians and RSS leaders in the past five months that people in J&K are happy with the decision taken by Union Government on 5 August. The reality is quite the opposite. Government says J&K has been integrated with India. Whereas people of J&K feel that their alienation is now complete.
It is quite a politically hopeless situation in J&K with no revival of political process in sight. The fundamental rights guaranteed by the Article 19 of Constitution of freedom of expression, to assemble peacably, to form associations or to move freely, which are basic requirement for carrying out any political activity in a democracy or for the existence of democracy itself, have been throttled.
The Union Government goes on the claim that normalcy has been restored in J&K, yet heavy military presence and restriction on fundamental rights, as we directly experienced during our Jammu to Srinagar march organised during November 26 to December 1, 2019, do not augur well for the future of J&K. The Union Government does not even seem to have a roadmap to create a situation of normalcy. The most important ingredient of normalcy - dialogue - is something in which the BJP and RSS don’t believe.
The restriction on fundamental rights facilitated by heavy presence of security forces -which is not a pleasant situation for them either - and democracy cannot go hand in hand. The Union Government must consider phased withdrawal of the Army and lifting of restrictions on fundamental rights for revival of political process.
There could be turmoil and the situation may turn very messy, but people’s will cannot be suppressed for very long if democracy is to survive. There should be State Assembly elections of the undivided J&K held as soon as possible and if the Union Government claims that people of J&K are agreeable to the decisions taken by it then the decisions should be approved by the Assembly, only then the decisions can be considered legitimate.
Otherwise, the situation existing prior to that must be restored and, in fact, the agreement of Government of India with the ruler of J&K at the time of accession must be honoured. In addition an attempt should be made after a dialogue with Government of Pakistan to reunite the two portions of J&K, currently with Indian and Pakistan, and a joint management of the united J&K should be worked out by the two countries.
Only such a solution will end the enmity of India and Pakistan too and will make the people of J&K happy. As things stand, numerous people in J&K feel that they have become a scapegoat for political gains of ruling elites in India and Pakistan.
---
*Social and political activist, **teaches at Azim Premji University

Comments

TRENDING

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

The golden crop: How turmeric is transforming women's lives in tribal India

By Vikas Meshram*   When the lush green fields of turmeric sway in the tribal belt of southern Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh, and Gujarat, it is not merely a spice crop — it is the golden glow of self-reliance. In villages where even basic spices once had to be bought from the market, the very soil today is yielding a prosperity that has transformed the lives of thousands of families. At the heart of this transformation is the initiative of Vaagdhara, which has linked turmeric with livelihoods, nutrition, and village self-governance — gram swaraj.

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Rajiv Shah  Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

Authoritarian destruction of the public sphere in Ecuador: Trumpism in action?

By Pilar Troya Fernández  The situation in Ecuador under Daniel Noboa's government is one of authoritarianism advancing on several fronts simultaneously to consolidate neoliberalism and total submission to the US international agenda. These are not isolated measures, but rather a coordinated strategy that combines job insecurity, the dismantling of the welfare state, unrestricted access to mining, the continuation of oil exploitation without environmental considerations, the centralization of power through the financial suffocation of local governments, and the systematic criminalization of all forms of opposition and popular organization.

Echoes of Vietnam and Chile: The devastating cost of the I-A Axis in Iran

​ By Ram Puniyani  ​The recent joint military actions by Israel and the United States against Iran have been devastating. Like all wars, this conflict is brutal to its core, leaving a trail of human suffering in its wake. The stated pretext for this aggression—the brutality of the Ayatollah Khamenei regime and its nuclear ambitions—clashes sharply with the reality of the diplomatic landscape. Iran had expressed a willingness to remain at the negotiating table, signaling a readiness to concede points emerging from dialogue. 

False claim? What Venezuela is witnessing is not surrender but a tactical retreat

By Manolo De Los Santos  The early morning hours of January 3, 2026, marked an inflection point in Venezuela and Latin America’s centuries-long struggle for self-determination and independence. Operation Absolute Resolve, ordered by the Trump administration, constituted the most brutal and direct military assault on a sovereign state in the region in recent memory. In a shocking operation that left hundreds dead, President Nicolás Maduro and First Lady Cilia Flores were illegally kidnapped from Venezuelan soil and transported to the United States, where they now face fabricated charges in a New York federal detention facility. In the two months since this act of war, a torrent of speculation has emerged from so-called experts and pundits across the political spectrum. This has followed three main lines: One . The operation’s success indicated treason at the highest levels of the Bolivarian Revolution. Two . Acting President Delcy Rodríguez and the remaining leadership have abandone...

The selective memory of a violent city: Uttam Nagar and the invisible victims of Delhi

By Sunil Kumar*  Hundreds of murders take place in Delhi every year, yet only a few incidents become topics of nationwide discussion. The question is: why does this happen? Today, the incident in Uttam Nagar has become the centre of national debate. A 26-year-old man, Tarun Kumar, was killed following a dispute that reportedly began after a balloon hit a small child. In several colonies of Delhi, slogans such as “Jai Shri Ram” and “Vande Mataram” are being raised while demanding the death penalty for Tarun’s killers. As a result, nearly 50,000 residents of Hastsal JJ Colony are now living in what resembles a state of confinement. 

The price of silence: Why Modi won’t follow Shastri, appeal for sacrifice

By Arundhati Dhuru, Sandeep Pandey*  ​In 1965, as India grappled with war and a crippling food crisis, Prime Minister Lal Bahadur Shastri faced a United States that used wheat shipments under the PL-480 agreement as a lever to dictate Indian foreign policy. Shastri’s response remains legendary: he appealed to the nation to skip one meal a day. Millions of middle-class households complied, choosing temporary hunger over the sacrifice of national dignity. Today, India faces a modern equivalent in the energy sector, yet the leadership’s response stands in stark contrast to that era of self-reliance.

Gujarat government urged to introduce heat-stress safety rules for construction workers

By A Representative   A representation submitted to Gujarat Labour, Skill Development and Employment Minister Kunvarji Bavaliya has urged the state government to introduce legally enforceable safety standards to protect construction workers from extreme heat and heatwaves, and to launch a financial assistance scheme for labourers affected by climate-related health risks.