National consultation on danger of eviction of lakhs of forest dwellers after July 10

By A Representative
Several civil rights organizations have decided to hold a day-long consultation on forest rights movements and the way forward in New Delhi July 2, 2019 against the backdrop of the fear that lakhs of forest dwellers may again be on the verge of an “existential crisis” after July 10, the date till which the Supreme Court gave a reprieve on February 23 for its controversial February 13 order, directing state governments to evict them if their claims under the Forest Rights Act (FRA) have been rejected.
The consultation will be held to press upon Central and state governments to implement FRA “effectively and unconditionally” in all forest regions, including Critical Forest Areas, even as working out a plan for a united struggle with the “collective initiative” of diverse forest rights organisations/groups and supporters in different walks of life, including journalists, lawyers, researchers, social action groups and others.
The consultation proposes to begin a dialogue with political parties to bring FRA in the mainstream of political discourse so that this historic act can become an important political issue during and after the electoral process. A decision may be taken to form an all-India alliance with organisations/groups, actively engaged in forest rights movement to represent the collective voice and to take forward the task ahead.
To be held at Assam Association, Srimanta Sankaradeva Bhawan, Satsang Vihar Marg, Qutab Institutional Area, the consultation will be preceded by a meeting of the Bhumi Adhikar Andolan on July 1, 2019 which will be critically discussing on the Land Acquisition Act 2013, the various state legislations which has been drafted in this regard.
The organizers of the consultation include Jitendra Choudhary of the Adivasi Adhikar Rashtriya Manch, Hannan Mollah and Prem Singh of the Bhumi Adhikar Andolan, Roma and Ashok Choudhary of the All India Union of Forest Working People, Meera Sanghamitra and Madhuresh Kumar of the National Alliance of People’s Movements, and Shweta, Satyam Shrivastava, Sanjeev Kumar, Anil Varghese of the Delhi Solidarity Group.

Incarceration of Prof Saibaba 'revives' the question: What is crime, who is criminal?

By Kunal Pant* In 2016, a Supreme Court Judge asked the state of Maharashtra, “Do you want to extract a pound of flesh?” The statement was directed against the state for contesting the bail plea of Delhi University Professor GN Saibaba. Saibaba was arrested in 2014, a justification for which was to prevent him from committing what the police called “anti-national activities.”

If Maoist violence is illegitimate, how is Hindutva, state violence justified? Can right-wing wash off its sins?

By Swami Agnivesh* and Sandeep Pandey** There was major police action against Sudha Bhardwaj, Gautam Navlakha, Varvara Rao, Vernon Gonsalves and Arun Ferreira on 28 August, 2018. Before this police arrested Professor Shoma Sen, Adocate Sudhir Gadling, Sudhir Dhawle, Mahesh Raut and Rona Wilson on 6 June. Even before this Dr. Binayak Sen, Soni Sori, Ajay TG, Professor GN Saibaba and Prashant Rahi have been arrested and all these activists have been accused of having links with Maoists.

Caste 'continues to influence' hiring, wages, migration patterns in India

By Rajiv Shah A recent academic study has highlighted how caste and social identity continue to shape employment opportunities, wages and access to secure livelihoods in India, even as the country projects itself as one of the world’s fastest-growing economies. The findings, published in the 2026 Springer volume Unequal Opportunities: An Analysis of Inequalities in Employment Opportunities Among Different Social Groups in Labor Markets of India , argue that structural discrimination remains embedded in both formal and informal labour markets.

Counterview

Search This Blog