Skip to main content

600 prominent Indian citizens appeal to Indian, Pak govts to "refrain" from further hostilities

By A Representative
As many as 600 citizens of India, “deeply concerned” at the recent escalation of tensions between India and Pakistan leading to “climate of intolerance”, have appeal to the two governments to “refrain from further hostilities, overt or covert, and to resolve their differences within the framework of international law and human rights.”
In a statement, they have said, while “nothing can justify the act of terrorism that took the lives of more than 40 CRPF personnel in Pulwama on February 14, 2019”, nor can “anything justify the Pakistan government’s covert support of armed groups that have carried out this sort of attack in Kashmir”, they insist, “India’s response to this incident must abide by international law in letter and spirit.”
In a statement, they have said, “The history of war across the world has repeatedly shown how easily and speedily an armed conflict can escalate well beyond what was initially expected”, adding, “It would be easy for seemingly “safe” strikes and counter-strikes between India and Pakistan to lead to a major confrontation, possibly even nuclear war, with disastrous consequences for both sides.”
Pointing out that “even a limited confrontation would resolve nothing – neither the tensions between India and Pakistan, nor the Kashmir dispute”, the statement says, “On the contrary, it would aggravate tensions and delay the process of conflict resolution.”
According to the statement, “The principal victims of this conflict are the civilian residents of Kashmir, who have endured immense suffering over the years, including gross human rights violations. In recent days, Kashmiris have also been a target of brutal attacks across the country.” It adds, “If the conflict intensifies, this hostility is likely to be extended to other minorities and dissidents.”
It continues, “Perhaps the biggest national damage is the erosion of democracy including the freedom of expression and dissent. Unfortunately, the climate of jingoism that tends to develop around this sort of situation is obscuring these simple truths. Even reasoned demands for a peaceful solution tend to be conflated with anti-national sentiment.”
---
Click HERE for list of signatories

Comments

TRENDING

BRICS ends, but Bangladesh's empty chair says more than any declaration

By Nava Thakuria  The 18th BRICS Leaders' Summit, hosted by India at Bharat Mandapam in New Delhi on 12-13 September 2026, has concluded with leaders formally adopting the New Delhi Declaration. The gathering, themed "Building for Resilience, Innovation, Cooperation and Sustainability," drew Russian President Vladimir Putin, Chinese President Xi Jinping, Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian and other leaders of the now 11-member bloc, along with heads of partner organisations such as ASEAN, the African Union and the Eurasian Economic Union. Diplomats had worked through the final hours to bridge differences — notably between Iran and the UAE over West Asian tensions — before the declaration was signed.

Swaminarayan, untouchability and the 'we are not Hindu' argument

By Rajiv Shah   Following my blog on why the Eiffel Tower authorities should take all the blame for giving in to the Swaminarayan sadhus ’ bizarre demand to “invisibilise” women, including its female staff, during their visit to the internationally renowned Paris tourist centre on September 5, an interesting comment by one of the top academics drew my attention to something I vaguely knew about one of India’s most powerful and richest religious sects.

BAPS, the Eiffel Tower and the curious silence on secularism

By Rajiv Shah   I was a little surprised to see how some of those whom I respect for taking a firm stand on patriarchal issues reacted to the manner in which they responded to the recent incident in Paris, in which women employees of the Eiffel Tower were asked to remain "invisible" on September 5 when 100 BAPS sadhus visited one of the world's top tourist destinations.