Vacancies in CIC, 26,000 backlog: Supreme Court seeks status report from GoI

By A Representative
Taking a serious view of vacancies in the Central Information Commission (CIC), the Supreme Court has expressed its concern regarding the status of functioning of CIC, asking the Government of India (GoI) to file a status report within one week and scheduled the next hearing on December 13, 2018.
During the hearing on December 3, the petitioners, Anjali Bhardwaj, Lokesh Batra and Amrita Johri, pointed out that at present there were eight vacancies in CIC, including that of the Chief Information Commissioner, and the backlog of appeals/complaints had risen to more than 26,000.
The bench of Justices AK Sikri and S Abdul Nazeer -- which heard the public interest litigation urging the Supreme Court to give directions to ensure that appointments of information commissioners in a timely and transparent manner -- sought clarification on advertisement issued by the GoI for the posts of information commissioners and chief information commissioner, which allegedly did not specify the salary and tenure, even though these were specifically defined in the Right to Information (RTI) Act.
While the petitioners, appearing through senior advocate Prashant Bhushan, Pranav Sachdeva and Rahul Gupta, said the advertisements were not in keeping with the RTI law, the GoI counsel stated that the government was intending to amend the RTI Act, adding, the selection committee was set to meet on December 11, 2018 to finalise the appointments.
The court took on record a chart put together by the petitioners showing the commission-wise status of vacancies and pendency. The petitioners pointed out that the vacancies in the commissions across the country is systematically throttling the functioning of the RTI Act and undermining the transparency regime.
The last hearing took place on July 27, when the Supreme Court directed GoI to file an affidavit stating how many posts it proposed to fill in the commission based on the advertisement issued, the time schedule for filling the posts, why appointments were not made subsequent to a 2016 advertisement and measures to ensure transparency in the process of appointment which were highlighted in PIL.

Incarceration of Prof Saibaba 'revives' the question: What is crime, who is criminal?

By Kunal Pant* In 2016, a Supreme Court Judge asked the state of Maharashtra, “Do you want to extract a pound of flesh?” The statement was directed against the state for contesting the bail plea of Delhi University Professor GN Saibaba. Saibaba was arrested in 2014, a justification for which was to prevent him from committing what the police called “anti-national activities.”

If Maoist violence is illegitimate, how is Hindutva, state violence justified? Can right-wing wash off its sins?

By Swami Agnivesh* and Sandeep Pandey** There was major police action against Sudha Bhardwaj, Gautam Navlakha, Varvara Rao, Vernon Gonsalves and Arun Ferreira on 28 August, 2018. Before this police arrested Professor Shoma Sen, Adocate Sudhir Gadling, Sudhir Dhawle, Mahesh Raut and Rona Wilson on 6 June. Even before this Dr. Binayak Sen, Soni Sori, Ajay TG, Professor GN Saibaba and Prashant Rahi have been arrested and all these activists have been accused of having links with Maoists.

Caste 'continues to influence' hiring, wages, migration patterns in India

By Rajiv Shah A recent academic study has highlighted how caste and social identity continue to shape employment opportunities, wages and access to secure livelihoods in India, even as the country projects itself as one of the world’s fastest-growing economies. The findings, published in the 2026 Springer volume Unequal Opportunities: An Analysis of Inequalities in Employment Opportunities Among Different Social Groups in Labor Markets of India , argue that structural discrimination remains embedded in both formal and informal labour markets.

Counterview

Search This Blog