Silicosis: Gujarat HC asks Employees' State Insurance Corp to pay compensation to 9 victims of deadly disease

By Jagdish Patel*
The Gujarat High Court has dismissed the appeal filed by the Employees' State Insurance Corporation (ESIC), Vadodara, challenging the order of the ESI Court, Vadodara to pay disablement benefit as compensation to nine silicosis victims, all of whom are adivasis from Gujarat.
Belonging to the Jhalod block in Dahod district, these tribal workers had gone to work in quartz crushing units of Godhara between 2000 and 2005. They were exposed to high level of silica dust at work. Soon they started getting sick and some died. Many left the workplace and went back to their native home.
When the People's Training and Research Centre (PTRC), a voluntary organization working on occupational safety and health, came to know about the problem, it approached the state health department and requested an inquiry. The state health commissioner directed the National Institute of Occupational Health (NIOH) Ahmedabad, to make an inquiry.
In October 2004, NIOH organized a medical camp in Jhalod Community Health Centre (CHC) and confirmed diagnosis in nine workers out of 24 examined. Later, the tuberculosis (TB) department of the Dahod Civil Hospital kept sent X-rays to NIOH for opinion. The diagnosis was done either by the General Hospital, Vadodara, or the Civil Hospital, Ahemedabad.
Following this, PTRC started collecting employment evidence by filing the Right to Information (RTI) pleas. In 15 cases it succeded in collecting adequate evidence. In 2007, 15 victims filed applications before the ESIC local office in Kalol to pay them benefits. But there was no reply.
In 2008 the workmen filed an appeal in the ESI Court, Vadodara. Pending hearing, six appellants succumbed to silicosis. Silicosis is known to be a fatal lung disease. In 2015 February, the ESI Court passed an order in favor of the remaining nine applicants.
ESIC challenged ESI Court the order in the Gujarat High Court in December 2015. Justice Pardiwala passed the historical judgment, dismissing the ESIC plea.
Arguing in the High Court, senior counsel Shilpa Shah for one of the workmen pointed towards how he was examined by the Civil Hospital, Dahod, and x-rays were taken. It was diagnosed by the Civil Hospital, Dahod, that he is suffering from silicosis. The medical reports of the workman was forwarded to the NIOH as the respondent was suffering from silicosis. Based on the medical reports, the workman sought compensation from the ESIC.
She said, the application filed by the workman, who is registered with the ESI Hospital, was ignored and not acted upon. The victim was not referred to the Medical Board, as per Sector 54-A of the ESI Act by ESIC, even though there was thumping and convincing evidence as regards the respondent suffering from silicosis. This forced the workman file an application directly before the ESI Court in 2008, as his physical condition was deteriorating.
In all, Shah said, there the ESI Court heard an appeal from 15 insured persons, out of which six succumbed to the disease during the pendency of the case, adding, the ESI Court observed that the respondents were suffering from disease.
The appeal in the ESI Court was filed under Section 75(2A) of the ESI Act stipulates that, in case an insured person is not referred to or examined by a Medical Board by the ESIC, the ESI Court could decide upon the matter to direct ESIC to have such claim determined by the Medical Board.
According to Shah, as it was an admitted fact that the workmen were suffering from silicosis, and the list of insured persons suffering from silicosis was produced on record by the Deputy Director of the Appellant Corporation itself. In such circumstances, the ESI Court had cogent and convincing evidence to determine that the respondents were indeed suffering from silicosis.
In such circumstances, the consequential benefits to receive the disablement benefit for lifetime are required to be granted, she insisted.
--
*Director, Peoples Training And Research Centre, Vadodara

Comments

From Kerala to Bangladesh: Lynching highlights deep social faultlines

By A Representative The recent incidents of mob lynching—one in Bangladesh involving a Hindu citizen and another in Kerala where a man was killed after being mistaken for a “Bangladeshi”—have sparked outrage and calls for accountability.

Gram sabha as reformer: Mandla’s quiet challenge to the liquor economy

By Raj Kumar Sinha* This year, the Union Ministry of Panchayati Raj is organising a two-day PESA Mahotsav in Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, on 23–24 December 2025. The event marks the passage of the Panchayats (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act, 1996 (PESA), enacted by Parliament on 24 December 1996 to establish self-governance in Fifth Schedule areas. Scheduled Areas are those notified by the President of India under Article 244(1) read with the Fifth Schedule of the Constitution, which provides for a distinct framework of governance recognising the autonomy of tribal regions. At present, Fifth Schedule areas exist in ten states: Andhra Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Gujarat, Himachal Pradesh, Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Odisha, Rajasthan and Telangana. The PESA Act, 1996 empowers Gram Sabhas—the village assemblies—as the foundation of self-rule in these areas. Among the many powers devolved to them is the authority to take decisions on local matters, including the regulation...

MG-NREGA: A global model still waiting to be fully implemented

By Bharat Dogra When the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MG-NREGA) was introduced in India nearly two decades ago, it drew worldwide attention. The reason was evident. At a time when states across much of the world were retreating from responsibility for livelihoods and welfare, the world’s second most populous country—with nearly two-thirds of its people living in rural or semi-rural areas—committed itself to guaranteeing 100 days of employment a year to its rural population.

When a city rebuilt forgets its builders: Migrant workers’ struggle for sanitation in Bhuj

Khasra Ground site By Aseem Mishra* Access to safe drinking water and sanitation is not a privilege—it is a fundamental human right. This principle has been unequivocally recognised by the United Nations and repeatedly affirmed by the Supreme Court of India as intrinsic to the right to life and dignity under Article 21 of the Constitution. Yet, for thousands of migrant workers living in Bhuj, this right remains elusive, exposing a troubling disconnect between constitutional guarantees, policy declarations, and lived reality.

Policy changes in rural employment scheme and the politics of nomenclature

By N.S. Venkataraman* The Government of India has introduced a revised rural employment programme by fine-tuning the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA), which has been in operation for nearly two decades. The MGNREGA scheme guarantees 100 days of employment annually to rural households and has primarily benefited populations in rural areas. The revised programme has been named VB-G RAM–G (Viksit Bharat Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission – Gramin). The government has stated that the revised scheme incorporates several structural changes, including an increase in guaranteed employment from 100 to 125 days, modifications in the financing pattern, provisions to strengthen unemployment allowances, and penalties for delays in wage payments. Given the extent of these changes, the government has argued that a new name is required to distinguish the revised programme from the existing MGNREGA framework. As has been witnessed in recent years, the introdu...

Rollback of right to work? VB–GRAM G Bill 'dilutes' statutory employment guarantee

By A Representative The Right to Food Campaign has strongly condemned the passage of the Viksit Bharat – Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission (Gramin) (VB–GRAM G) Bill, 2025, describing it as a major rollback of workers’ rights and a fundamental dilution of the statutory Right to Work guaranteed under the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA). In a statement, the Campaign termed the repeal of MGNREGA a “dark day for workers’ rights” and accused the government of converting a legally enforceable, demand-based employment guarantee into a centralised, discretionary welfare scheme.

Aravalli at the crossroads: Environment, democracy, and the crisis of justice

By Rajendra Singh* The functioning of the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change has undergone a troubling shift. Once mandated to safeguard forests and ecosystems, the Ministry now appears increasingly aligned with industrial interests. Its recent affidavit before the Supreme Court makes this drift unmistakably clear. An institution ostensibly created to protect the environment now seems to have strayed from that very purpose.

'Structural sabotage': Concern over sector-limited job guarantee in new employment law

By A Representative The advocacy group Centre for Financial Accountability (CFA) has raised concerns over the passage of the Viksit Bharat – Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission (VB–G RAM G), which was approved during the recently concluded session of Parliament amid protests by opposition members. The legislation is intended to replace the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA).

Making rigid distinctions between Indian and foreign 'historically untenable'

By A Representative Oral historian, filmmaker and cultural conservationist Sohail Hashmi has said that everyday practices related to attire, food and architecture in India reflect long histories of interaction and adaptation rather than rigid or exclusionary ideas of identity. He was speaking at a webinar organised by the Indian History Forum (IHF).

Search This Blog