In 2018, the shadow of Emergency is reincarnating itself, limits are being imposed on freedom of expression

By Gautam Thaker*

In the last week of June, BJP lashed out at the Congress on the Emergency clamped in 1975. From Mumbai the Prime Minister and from Ahmedabad the party president uttered strong words of criticism. They showed aggressive gestures as if it were the last attempt to launch an attack on the Congress before the forthcoming elections of 2019.
Actually, they should have also revealed the outcome of four years administration and tasks completed, but it did not happen.
Indeed, we all need to understand or realize as to why the Emergency was clamped by Indira Gandhi. At that point of time, there was unbearable inflation and unimaginable corruption. In the year 1974, on both these counts, violent agitations were spearheaded by students. Known as Nav Nirman agitations, these were also called roti riots. These spread throughout the country under the leadership of Jay Prakash Narayan.
Indira felt that, in order to stick to power, new, stringent laws would have to be enacted. As if this was not enough, the Allahabad High Court issued a directive banning her to contest elections for next six years. She felt that by attacking fundamental rights aimed at preventing liberty of thought, speech and expression, and distancing people by misleading them, she could stick to the reins of power. Hence, she announced for press censorship and banned freedom of thought, speech and expression.
People of the country could not tolerate this and all the parties joined together and gave the leadership to Jay Prakash Narayan in 1977. As a result of Parliamentary elections, people secured second independence. People of the country did an excellent task, worthy of inscribing in golden letters in the country's history.
Against this backdrop, comparisons are bound to be made. In 2018, as if, the shadow of the Emergency has reincarnated itself. Limits are being sought to be imposed on the freedom of expression. Especially, dangers are mounting against mass media, media personnel and journalists. Some of them have even been murdered.
Lack or absence of truthful news because of Goebbelsian propaganda, and what has come to be identified as godi media (sitting in the laps of authorities), are a matter of concern. In the name of patriotism and cultural nationalism, freedom of writing, and especially freedom of speech, are sought to be curbed. Corruption has reached at its peak.
On the economic front, people have not yet resuscitated themselves from the assault and shock of demonetization and imposition of the Goods and Services Tax. Systematic efforts are being made to suppress and cow down activists struggling without allegiance to any one party for preservation and protection peoples liberties. Anybody expressing voice of dissent is being labeled or branded as insurgent.
On evaluating of the entire situation prevailing in 1975, this year, 2018, it appears as if we are being pushed backwards by 43 years. In view of arbitrary, anti-people, dictatorial approach of todays rulers, concerned citizens and those in favour of constitutional democracy are in a state of distress. Even ruling party leaders are reported to have begun stating that more serious and unimaginable situation, worse than the Emergency, has arisen.
When democratic values are being violated and rulers are attempting to stick to power by disregarding constitutional provisions, it does pose a big question as to how to struggle against the five Ms -- namely Money, Muscles, Madira (liquor), Media and Machines (EVM). There is also the need to face a situation where the structure of democracy is sought to be intangibly sucked or squeezed from within.
While issues of education and health have degenerated to an extreme, people would have to unite for safeguarding our democratic values. A situation has arisen where, in order to preserve our rights and liberties, we would need to remain constantly awake, ready to face consequences. Indeed, people would need be united irrespective of their caste, creed or racial affiliation. The ruling party would have to be made to take quick and effective steps to solve the problems faced by the poor to control the deteriorating situation.
---
*General secretary, People's Union for Civil Liberties, Gujarat. Contact: gthaker1946@gmail.com

Comments

From Kerala to Bangladesh: Lynching highlights deep social faultlines

By A Representative The recent incidents of mob lynching—one in Bangladesh involving a Hindu citizen and another in Kerala where a man was killed after being mistaken for a “Bangladeshi”—have sparked outrage and calls for accountability.

Gram sabha as reformer: Mandla’s quiet challenge to the liquor economy

By Raj Kumar Sinha* This year, the Union Ministry of Panchayati Raj is organising a two-day PESA Mahotsav in Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, on 23–24 December 2025. The event marks the passage of the Panchayats (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act, 1996 (PESA), enacted by Parliament on 24 December 1996 to establish self-governance in Fifth Schedule areas. Scheduled Areas are those notified by the President of India under Article 244(1) read with the Fifth Schedule of the Constitution, which provides for a distinct framework of governance recognising the autonomy of tribal regions. At present, Fifth Schedule areas exist in ten states: Andhra Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Gujarat, Himachal Pradesh, Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Odisha, Rajasthan and Telangana. The PESA Act, 1996 empowers Gram Sabhas—the village assemblies—as the foundation of self-rule in these areas. Among the many powers devolved to them is the authority to take decisions on local matters, including the regulation...

MG-NREGA: A global model still waiting to be fully implemented

By Bharat Dogra When the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MG-NREGA) was introduced in India nearly two decades ago, it drew worldwide attention. The reason was evident. At a time when states across much of the world were retreating from responsibility for livelihoods and welfare, the world’s second most populous country—with nearly two-thirds of its people living in rural or semi-rural areas—committed itself to guaranteeing 100 days of employment a year to its rural population.

When a city rebuilt forgets its builders: Migrant workers’ struggle for sanitation in Bhuj

Khasra Ground site By Aseem Mishra* Access to safe drinking water and sanitation is not a privilege—it is a fundamental human right. This principle has been unequivocally recognised by the United Nations and repeatedly affirmed by the Supreme Court of India as intrinsic to the right to life and dignity under Article 21 of the Constitution. Yet, for thousands of migrant workers living in Bhuj, this right remains elusive, exposing a troubling disconnect between constitutional guarantees, policy declarations, and lived reality.

Policy changes in rural employment scheme and the politics of nomenclature

By N.S. Venkataraman* The Government of India has introduced a revised rural employment programme by fine-tuning the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA), which has been in operation for nearly two decades. The MGNREGA scheme guarantees 100 days of employment annually to rural households and has primarily benefited populations in rural areas. The revised programme has been named VB-G RAM–G (Viksit Bharat Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission – Gramin). The government has stated that the revised scheme incorporates several structural changes, including an increase in guaranteed employment from 100 to 125 days, modifications in the financing pattern, provisions to strengthen unemployment allowances, and penalties for delays in wage payments. Given the extent of these changes, the government has argued that a new name is required to distinguish the revised programme from the existing MGNREGA framework. As has been witnessed in recent years, the introdu...

Rollback of right to work? VB–GRAM G Bill 'dilutes' statutory employment guarantee

By A Representative The Right to Food Campaign has strongly condemned the passage of the Viksit Bharat – Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission (Gramin) (VB–GRAM G) Bill, 2025, describing it as a major rollback of workers’ rights and a fundamental dilution of the statutory Right to Work guaranteed under the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA). In a statement, the Campaign termed the repeal of MGNREGA a “dark day for workers’ rights” and accused the government of converting a legally enforceable, demand-based employment guarantee into a centralised, discretionary welfare scheme.

Aravalli at the crossroads: Environment, democracy, and the crisis of justice

By Rajendra Singh* The functioning of the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change has undergone a troubling shift. Once mandated to safeguard forests and ecosystems, the Ministry now appears increasingly aligned with industrial interests. Its recent affidavit before the Supreme Court makes this drift unmistakably clear. An institution ostensibly created to protect the environment now seems to have strayed from that very purpose.

'Structural sabotage': Concern over sector-limited job guarantee in new employment law

By A Representative The advocacy group Centre for Financial Accountability (CFA) has raised concerns over the passage of the Viksit Bharat – Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission (VB–G RAM G), which was approved during the recently concluded session of Parliament amid protests by opposition members. The legislation is intended to replace the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA).

Making rigid distinctions between Indian and foreign 'historically untenable'

By A Representative Oral historian, filmmaker and cultural conservationist Sohail Hashmi has said that everyday practices related to attire, food and architecture in India reflect long histories of interaction and adaptation rather than rigid or exclusionary ideas of identity. He was speaking at a webinar organised by the Indian History Forum (IHF).

Search This Blog