Skip to main content

Naive to assume Modi wasn't aware of Banaras students' protest when he was in town, or ruthless lathi-charge after he left

Counterview Desk
About 50 prominent activists attached with the National Alliance of People’s Movements (NAPM) have condemned “state repression” on Banaras Hindu University (BHU) women students, who were demanding a sexual-violence free campus, demanding criminal action against BHU’s vice chancellor for his omissions and commissions in the entire episode. Text of the statement:
The National Alliance of People’s Movements (NAPM) condemns the Uttar Pradesh government’s violent, cowardly and indefensible crack down on the young women-students led movement in the Banaras Hindu University (BHU) campus, seeking a university space with equal rights for women and freedom from sexual harassment and violence. That the long standing and quite simple demands of the students were not being addressed and in fact survivors of sexual harassment were repeatedly being shamed by the male proctors, even as the identified perpetrators were being allowed to go Scot-free, compelled the students to embark on a peaceful mass protest, in the wake of relentless incidents of sexual harassment on the campus.

Instead of engaging in a dialogue with the agitating students and resolving their basic and genuine grievances, the university authorities led by the vice chancellor (VC), undoubtedly, at the behest of the State government chose to physically brutalize the students, late into the night and again on the next day, by unlawfully unleashing a rabid male police force on women students! We have also learnt from credible sources that the VC and proctors have allowed a group of ‘private security’ inside the campus, who were the first to unleash violence on the students, before the police struck!
While on the one hand, this government prides itself in slogans and schemes of ‘Beti Bachao’ Beti Padhao’; on the other it seeks to curtail the most fundamental freedoms of girls and women in multiple ways by moral policing, privatization, lack of basic amenities, safety and non-resolution of grievances. It is exactly this reality that the ‘brave betis’ of BHU tried to expose through their peaceful protest and demanded amongst other things, a campus where they could take for granted an atmosphere of safety and security from misogynistic oppression and violence and where there would be no arbitrary and discriminative restrictions on them owing to their gender. We salute the courageous struggle of the young women students and express our complete solidarity with them.
The incidents at BHU bring forth two very basic issues; one, the manner of appointments of the vice-chancellors and two, the lack of effective mechanisms for redressal of complaints, especially that of sexual harassment. As a practice, vice-chancellors must be competent, independent and persons of high integrity in academic and social life, committed to constitutional values. What we are instead witnessing is a clear trend of appointment of VCs, such as that of BHU, who are committed to a certain unconstitutional ideology and have charges of corruption and cases pending in the courts! The issue of appointments of VCs must needs to be seriously addressed.
We also completely endorse the demands of the young women students for effective mechanisms and systems in place (such as GSCASH) to seriously and empathetically address grievances / complaints, especially that of sexual harassment and gender-based discrimination and violence, in line with the Vishakha Guidelines of the Supreme Court and the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013. These mechanisms must be formed with the active involvement of the women students, women faculty and well-known, credible and committed women civil society activists.
The BHU episode, after Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU) and Hyderabad Central University (HCU), is yet another stark reminder of the larger challenge of ‘saffronization’ of our Universities at the highest levels, where no less than the vice-chancellors, who are handpicked to serve the ideological and political agendas of the ruling dispensation impose some of the most arbitrary and draconian restrictions, especially on female and politically active students. Actions such as limiting library hours, early closure of college gates, curbs on late-evening usage of mobile phones by women students, embargo on serving of non-vegetarian food, coercing students to sign affidavits not to participate in political activity, all reek of the patriarchal and regressive mindset of the BHU VC, defeating the scientific and secular temper of our Constitution.
It would be naive to assume that the Prime Minister, in whose constituency the university is situated, was neither aware of the student’s protest when he was in town, nor of the ruthless lathi-charge which took place, soon after he left Banaras! His regular route was in fact changed, to avoid his interface with the protestors at BHU! We are appalled that the university authorities have not only failed in discharging their duties of ensuring a safe campus for the girl students and considering their complaints promptly and seriously; they have in fact been imposing illogical restrictions and playing a blame game of naming ‘outsiders’ and shaming insiders, instead of dealing sternly with those who violate the rights of girl students. They are also clearly responsible for letting the police inside the campus, facilitating the repression and registering en masse 1,000 FIRs on the students!
We strongly feel and demand that an FIR must be filed against Mr Girish Chandra Tripathi, the vice-chancellor of BHU, for all the omissions and commissions in this episode. Besides, Mr Tripathi, who is singularly responsible on behalf of the university to allow the situation to deteriorate must be removed with immediate effect, both on ethical and legal grounds!
We also think the Chief Minister of Uttar Pradesh owes a public apology to the hundreds of girls for the inaction and damage that has been caused, because of his government. FIRs against all students must be dropped unconditionally and instead FIRs must be filed against senior police and administrative officials for directing a lathi-charge on the students. Injured students must be compensated for the physical and mental trauma.
The university must immediately initiate a process of dialogue with the students and act upon their demands, ensuring their education within the campus in a safe and dignified manner. In particular, the university must immediately deploy female security personnel in sufficient strength and constitute GSCASH committees with the active involvement of the women students, women faculty and well-known, credible and committed women civil society activists.
Teesta Setalvad

We also condemn the 10 hrs arbitrary and unlawful detention of well-known journalist and human rights activist Teesta Setalvad, who was in Banaras on Monday to attend a pre-committed youth training event and categorically stated to the police that she had no plan to visit BHU. It is indeed reprehensible that the government chooses to detain and / or arrest anyone, in an unconstitutional manner, without any sufficient ground and in this case Teesta, since she rightly and lawfully refused to sign a bond undertaking that she would not enter the BHU campus. Her late night release with a warning to leave Banaras immediately and not enter BHU is also unlawful and condemnable. We think the political and legal impunity of the present government to indulge in such arbitrary actions, one after the other, in a relentless and remorseless manner, will cost it dearly.
---
Signatories include:
Medha Patkar, Narmada Bachao Andolan (NBA)
Aruna Roy, Nikhil Dey and Shankar Singh, Mazdoor Kisan Shakti Sangathan (MKSS)
Prafulla Samantara, Lok Shakti Abhiyan
Binayak Sen and Kavita Srivastava, People’s Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL)
Others

Comments

TRENDING

Academics urge Azim Premji University to drop FIR against Student Reading Circle

  By A Representative   A group of academics and civil society members has issued an open letter to the leadership of Azim Premji University expressing concern over the filing of a police complaint that led to an FIR against a student-run reading circle following a recent incident of violence on campus. The signatories state that they hold the university in high regard for its commitment to constitutional values, critical inquiry and ethical public engagement, and argue that it is precisely because of this reputation that the present development is troubling.

Was Netaji forced to alter face, die in obscurity in USSR in 1975? Was he so meek?

  By Rajiv Shah   This should sound almost hilarious. Not only did Subhas Chandra Bose not die in a plane crash in Taipei, nor was he the mysterious Gumnami Baba who reportedly passed away on 16 September 1985 in Ayodhya, but we are now told that he actually died in 1975—date unknown—“in oblivion” somewhere in the former Soviet Union. Which city? Moscow? No one seems to know.

Love letters in a lifelong war: Babusha Kohli’s resistance in verse

By Ravi Ranjan*  “War does not determine who is right—only who is left.” Bertrand Russell’s words echo hauntingly in our times, and few contemporary Hindi poets embody this truth as profoundly as Babusha Kohli. Emerging from Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, Kohli has carved a unique space in literature by weaving together tenderness, protest, and philosophy across poetry, prose, and cinema. Her work is not merely artistic expression—it is resistance, refuge, and a call for peace.

UAPA action against Telangana activist: Criminalising legitimate democratic activity?

By A Representative   The National Investigation Agency's Hyderabad branch has issued notices to more than ten individuals in Telangana in connection with FIR No. RC-04/2025. Those served include activists, former student leaders, civil rights advocates, poets, writers, retired schoolteachers, and local leaders associated with the Communist Party of India (CPI) and the Indian National Congress. 

Asbestos contamination in children’s products highlights global oversight gaps

By A Representative   A commentary published by the International Ban Asbestos Secretariat (IBAS) has drawn attention to the challenges governments face in responding effectively to global public-health risks. In an article written by Laurie Kazan-Allen and published on March 5, 2026, the author examines how the discovery of asbestos contamination in children’s play products has raised questions about regulatory oversight and international product safety. The article opens by reflecting on lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic, noting that governments in several countries were slow to respond to early warning signs of the crisis. Referring to the experience of the United Kingdom, the author writes that delays in implementing protective measures contributed to “232,112 recorded deaths and over a million people suffering from long Covid.” The commentary uses this example to illustrate what it describes as the dangers of underestimating emerging threats. Attention then turns...

Aligning too closely with U.S., allies, India’s silence on IRIS Dena raises troubling questions

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*  The reported sinking of the Iranian ship IRIS Dena in the Indian Ocean near Sri Lanka raises troubling questions about international norms and the credibility of the so-called rule-based order. If indeed the vessel was attacked by the American Navy while returning from a joint exercise in Visakhapatnam, it would represent a serious breach of trust and a violation of the principles that govern such cooperative engagements. Warships participating in these exercises are generally not armed for combat; they are meant to symbolize solidarity and friendship. The incident, therefore, is not only shocking but also deeply ironic.

The kitchen as prison: A feminist elegy for domestic slavery

By Garima Srivastava* Kumar Ambuj stands as one of the most incisive voices in contemporary Hindi poetry. His work, stripped of ornamentation, speaks directly to the lived realities of India’s marginalized—women, the rural poor, and those crushed under invisible forms of violence. His celebrated poem “Women Who Cook” (Khānā Banātī Striyāṃ) is not merely about food preparation; it is a searing indictment of patriarchal domestic structures that reduce women’s existence to endless, unpaid labour.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

India’s foreign policy at crossroads: Cost of silence in the face of aggression

By Venkatesh Narayanan, Sandeep Pandey  The widely anticipated yet unprovoked attack on Iran on March 1 by the United States and Israel has drawn sharp criticism from several quarters around the world. Reports indicate that the strikes have resulted in significant civilian casualties, including 165 elementary school girls, 20 female volleyball players, and many other civilians.