Skip to main content

Need to bring about uniformity in manner of reporting RTI statistics across India

By Venkatesh Nayak*
India’s Right to Information Act (RTI Act) will enter the 12th year of implementation on the 12th of October, this year. Information Commissions established under this law have an obligation to report on the manner of implementation of the law to the respective legislatures. Not all Information Commissions come out with their Annual Reports in a timely manner. A major reason for the delays in the preparation of the annual reports is lack of inputs from the public authorities through their parent ministries and departments. Although the Information Commissions are known to press upon the respective Governments to fulfill their reporting obligations, compliance is poor.
This year too, CHRI finds that there are only a handful of annual reports published for the latest year due. As a result, it is difficult to answer the most basic question – how many RTI applications are received from citizens all over the country in a given year. Similarly there is no clarity about the number of RTI applications received in any year since the RTI Act became fully operational because some information commissions have not published any annual report.
CHRI has collated data about RTI applications from all the annual reports of the Information Commissions available on their websites. Some of our major findings are:
  • A total of 1.75 crore (1,75,23,154) RTI applications are reported to have been made to the Central and State Governments during the period 2005-2015;
  • Top-3: The Central Government received more than a quarter (27.20% i.e., 47.66 lakhs) of the 1.75 crore requests submitted by citizens between 2005-2015 (financial year). The Government of Maharashtra also received more than a quarter (26.40% i.e., 46.26 lakhs) of the RTI applications submitted during this period. The Government of Karnataka received 11.83% (i.e., 20.73 lakhs) of the RTI applications submitted during this period. Taken together, the Central Government and the State Governments of Maharashtra and Karnataka account for almost 2/3rds(65.43%) of the RTI applications received from the citizenry, between the years 2005-2015.
  • Counting the RTI statistics published by 15 Information Commissions during the period 2013-2015(taking into account statistics available only for the latest year) a total of 60 lakh RTI requests were made by citizens during a period of one year. By a conservative extrapolation of this data to other States which have not published annual reports during the same period, it may be estimated said that the total number of RTI requests submitted across the country in a year during this period could be about 53-56 lakhs. Based on official figures we stand by our conservative estimate despite other RTI activists pegging the figure at 75-80 lakh RTI applications per year.
  • None of the Information Commissions that follow the financial year reporting cycle, have published their Annual Reports for the year 2015-16.
  • Amongst the Information Commissions that follow the calendar year reporting cycle, only Meghalaya and Sikkim have published their Annual Reports for the year 2015.
  • The Karnataka Information Commission is the only body that has published online, all annual reports due, since October, 2005.
    The above table: RTI applications received, as provided by Central govt, major states. Several big states such as Uttar Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh, have not compiled the number of applications made under RTI in their states.
    There is an urgent need to ensure the publication of annual reports in the larger States of Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh and Bihar. Without data from these States which have a large number of RTI users and activists, it is not possible to draw a more accurate statistical picture of the volume of RTI applications filed across the country. RTI users and activists must work with their legislators to question their Governments about the delay in the publication of annual reports wherever they are overdue.There is also an urgent need to bring about uniformity in the manner of reporting RTI statistics. Some Information Commissions report according to the calendar year while others use the financial year reporting cycle. If a uniform reporting cycle is adopted, it will be possible to arrive at a more accurate statistical picture of the manner of implementation of the RTI Act across the country.

    *Programme Coordinator, Access to Information Programme, Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative, New Delhi

Comments

TRENDING

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Hoping against despair after Myanmar President’s visit to India

By Nava Thakuria  Myanmar President U Min Aung Hlaing’s five-day official visit to India from 30 May to 3 June 2026 drew attention both in New Delhi and in India’s northeastern region, where policymakers and residents closely follow developments in the neighbouring country. The visit was significant because it touched on several issues of mutual concern, including security cooperation, border management, connectivity projects, trade, and regional stability.

Beyond data: The economist who refused to remain in the ivory tower

By Vikas Meshram   There are few people who are born into privilege yet choose to dedicate their lives to the cause of the poor. Jean Drèze is one such individual. Born on January 22, 1959, in Leuven, Belgium, into the family of a distinguished economist, Drèze has become one of the most influential voices in the study of poverty, inequality, and social policy in India. Having lived in India since 1979, he adopted Indian citizenship in 2002 and has since played a pivotal role in shaping some of the country's most important welfare initiatives.