US thintank: Modi succeeded in just 6 of 30 big reforms in two years; 11 "failures" include one-stop clearance
Releasing a list of 30 “big reforms” that the Modi government was supposed to undertake when it took office in May 2014, in a status report card, the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), a bipartisan, nonprofit thinktank headquartered in Washington, D.C., has found that in just six of them it has succeeded in moving forward, while in 11 there has not been any progress, and in 13 there has been only a partial movement.
The six main Modi’s “successes”, the thinktank notes, three are relate to attracting foreign direct investment (FDI).
These include included relaxing rules for allowing foreign investment in construction projects; allowing more than 50 per cent foreign investment in Indian railways; and fully opening the coal mining sector to private/foreign investment.
The other “successes” the thinktank notes are conducting “transparent auctions” of telecom spectrum; deregulating diesel pricing to “lower government subsidies” and “encourage” expansion of private hydrocarbon production; and extending the expiration date of industrial licenses from two to seven years.
Among Modi’s failure, says the thinktank report card, the Modi government has failed to make it easier to start a business by offering one-stop shopping for clearances. It underlines, “The World Bank’s “Doing Business” report notes that India requires 12.9 procedures to start a business—well above the South Asian average (7.9 procedures).”
Then there was the failure to “raise” the ceiling on foreign institutional investment in Indian companies from 10 per cent limit, hindering “investment in high-growth Indian companies”. The thinktank comments, “In his February 29 Budget Speech Finance Minister Jaitley raised the investment limit for foreign portfolio investors in public sector enterprises from 49 per cent from 24 per cent”, but even this change has not “been notified by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI).”
Also, says the thinktank, there was the failure to “relax government controls” over corporate downsizing India’s Industrial Disputes Act’s minimum 100 employees, “after which government permission is required to lay off workers”, adding, “Some firms choose to remain below this level, giving up growth opportunities, in order to retain flexibility.”
Then the government failed to “remove government-mandated minimum prices for agricultural goods”; to allow cities to issue municipal bonds to raise funds; to allow foreign lawyers to practice in India; creating a unified national tax on goods and services tax (GST); and make it quicker and easier for companies to go through bankruptcy.
Coming to partial successes, the thinktank notes, this could be seen in allowing more than 50 per cent foreign investment in defense; there is automatic approval of “FDI up to 49% automatic”, but beyond that there are certain conditions, like providing “access to state of the art technology.”
Similarly, there was partial success in allowing “more than 50% foreign investment in direct retail ecommerce”, as the “sector is still closed to FDI when companies sell directly to consumers”; in allowing insurance; deregulating natural gas pricing; ending retrospective taxation of crossborder investments; making it easier for states to use eminent domain to purchase land; reduce restrictions on foreign investment in multi-brand retail FDI; stop forcing banks to lend to “priority sectors”; and transfer to deliver cash subsidies through direct cash payments of subsidies.
The six main Modi’s “successes”, the thinktank notes, three are relate to attracting foreign direct investment (FDI).
These include included relaxing rules for allowing foreign investment in construction projects; allowing more than 50 per cent foreign investment in Indian railways; and fully opening the coal mining sector to private/foreign investment.
The other “successes” the thinktank notes are conducting “transparent auctions” of telecom spectrum; deregulating diesel pricing to “lower government subsidies” and “encourage” expansion of private hydrocarbon production; and extending the expiration date of industrial licenses from two to seven years.
Among Modi’s failure, says the thinktank report card, the Modi government has failed to make it easier to start a business by offering one-stop shopping for clearances. It underlines, “The World Bank’s “Doing Business” report notes that India requires 12.9 procedures to start a business—well above the South Asian average (7.9 procedures).”
Then there was the failure to “raise” the ceiling on foreign institutional investment in Indian companies from 10 per cent limit, hindering “investment in high-growth Indian companies”. The thinktank comments, “In his February 29 Budget Speech Finance Minister Jaitley raised the investment limit for foreign portfolio investors in public sector enterprises from 49 per cent from 24 per cent”, but even this change has not “been notified by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI).”
Also, says the thinktank, there was the failure to “relax government controls” over corporate downsizing India’s Industrial Disputes Act’s minimum 100 employees, “after which government permission is required to lay off workers”, adding, “Some firms choose to remain below this level, giving up growth opportunities, in order to retain flexibility.”
Then the government failed to “remove government-mandated minimum prices for agricultural goods”; to allow cities to issue municipal bonds to raise funds; to allow foreign lawyers to practice in India; creating a unified national tax on goods and services tax (GST); and make it quicker and easier for companies to go through bankruptcy.
Coming to partial successes, the thinktank notes, this could be seen in allowing more than 50 per cent foreign investment in defense; there is automatic approval of “FDI up to 49% automatic”, but beyond that there are certain conditions, like providing “access to state of the art technology.”
Similarly, there was partial success in allowing “more than 50% foreign investment in direct retail ecommerce”, as the “sector is still closed to FDI when companies sell directly to consumers”; in allowing insurance; deregulating natural gas pricing; ending retrospective taxation of crossborder investments; making it easier for states to use eminent domain to purchase land; reduce restrictions on foreign investment in multi-brand retail FDI; stop forcing banks to lend to “priority sectors”; and transfer to deliver cash subsidies through direct cash payments of subsidies.
---
Download scorecard HERE
Comments