Skip to main content

Vadodara riverfront project without environmental impact assessment?

By Rohit Prajapati, Trupti Shah*
The Vadodara Mahanagar Seva Sadan’s (VMSS) proposed Vishwamitri Riverfront Development Project resembles a mere real estate project. The “planned” Riverfront Project completely ignores the important characteristics of the river, its wetlands, ravines, biodiversity, flora and fauna, flood and floodplains etc. Many times sophisticated language and concepts are used in the feasibility report of the Vishwamitri Riverfront Development Project, but if one closely examines the report, it becomes abundantly clear that those words are not understood in letter and spirit.
The project work for the Vishwamitri Riverfront Development Project is being carried out hastily and mindlessly, without having conducted the mandatory Environment Impact Assessment (EIA) and Social Impact Assessment (SIA). The VMSS is using the people’s money in blatant violation of several laws of the land, including the following:
(1) The Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972.
(2) Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Notification, 2006 under the Environment (Protection) Act 1986.
(3) The Environment (Protection) Act 1986.
(4) The Wetlands (Conservation and Management) Rules, 2010.
The VMSS fails to understand the fact that the first step in any effort for the revival of the Vishwamitri River must be a proper understanding of what a river is.
A river is more than a channel carrying water; it is also a transporter of sediment; it is also the catchments, the river-bed, the banks, the vegetation on both sides, and the floodplain. A river harbours and interacts with innumerable organisms like plants, animals and microbes. It is a natural, living, organic whole, a hydrological and ecological system, and part of a larger ecological system. A river is also a network of tributaries and distributaries spread over its basin and the estuary.
The Vishwamitri River originating from the Pavagadh Hills has a unique ecosystem bearing a plethora of beautiful ravines right from its beginning till its end. Of paramount importance in its ecology is the presence of the highly protected species, the Indian crocodile. The crocodiles have been inhabiting and breeding in an 18 km stretch of the Vishwamitri River for thousands of years. The importance of this species is illustrated by the multiple legal and policy efforts which have been developed by the Government of India to protect the crocodile’s population.
As early as the late 1960s, “Indian Crocodile Conservation Project” was launched. Subsequently the crocodile has been included in Appendix-I of the Convention of International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES) and brought under Schedule-I of The Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972, meaning that any activity which is against the survival of the highly protected species without having been approved by the State Wildlife Board/ National Wildlife Board and the Government of India is patently illegal.
This brings one to the glaring fact that the activities carried out by the VMSS in the name of the Vishwamitri Riverfront Development Project, especially the proposed construction activities vis-a-vis JCB dumper, etc., have the potential to lead to destruction of the natural ecosystem and habitat of the crocodile but also its breeding grounds and nests.
It becomes abundantly clear that in the absence of any EIA or scientific study on the potential impacts to the protected and threatened crocodile, and the mandatory approval from the appropriate authorities, Vadodara Mahanagar Seva Sadan is in blatant violation of the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972. The said activity would amount to “hunting” as defined in Section 2 (16) of the said Act as follows:
“(16) “Hunting” with its grammatical variations and cognate expressions, includes:
Killing or poisoning of any wild animal or captive animal and every attempt to do so;
Capturing, coursing, snaring, trapping, driving or baiting any wild or captive animal and every attempt to do so;
Injuring or destroying or taking any part of the body or any such animal or in the case of wild birds or reptiles, damaging the eggs or such birds or reptiles, or disturbing the eggs or nests of such birds or reptiles.”
Further, the Environmental Clearance required under the (EIA) Notification of September, 2006, has not been applied for in respect to the Vishwamitri Riverfront Development Project. This is apparent in the fact that the VMSS has in November 2014 issued a tender for a consultant to conduct the EIA for the same.
Regardless, the project proponent has gone ahead with construction activities despite the fact that Section 6 of the EIA Notification of 2006 explicitly states, “An application seeking prior environmental clearance in all cases shall be made in the prescribed Form 1 annexed herewith and Supplementary Form 1A, if applicable, as given in Appendix II, after the identification of prospective site(s) for the project and/or activities to which the application relates, before commencing any construction activity, or preparation of land, at the site by the applicant.”
The environmental risk posed by the impugned project is further amplified by the fact that the same is being constructed on the wetlands of River Vishwamitri. Allowing the project to continue will result in irreversible damage to the ecology of the said wetlands which are sought to be protected by the Wetlands (Conservation and Management) Rules, 2010.
It is shocking that the VMSS has failed to analyse and plan based on the ground realities of the Vishwamitri River. The river experiences frequent flooding which is due to water logging and human induced activities.
The riparian vegetation along the banks of the Vishwamitri River, not only nurtures a rich biodiversity but also plays a crucial role in retaining water during heavy rainfall and in ground water recharge – particularly the ox-bows. Engineering the banks would convert the river into a huge ‘pipe’ which would lead to a further increase in flooding and obstruction to the natural course of ground water recharge.
Further, it is a well known fact that both municipal waste and untreated municipal sewage are routinely being dumped into the Vishwamitri River in contravention of the Municipal Solid Wastes (Management and Handling) Rules, 2000. The impugned project should not be allowed to progress in the absence of a comprehensive plan to stop the dumping of untreated sewage which is a health and environmental hazard, to protect its banks, remove the existing municipal waste that has been dumped, and return land which is currently being used for dumping back to the river.
The fact that VMSS has circumvented the mandatory EIA is even more egregious seeing as it also has failed to engaged in a meaningful a Social Impact Assessment for the impugned project. This large scale construction is bound to result in not only damage to the river, riverbed, downstream river, its biodiversity, its active water body and the wetlands, but it will also impact the people living downstream and their livelihoods. Further, the impugned Project had already displaced more than 5,000 people and many more are going to be displaced by the Riverfront Project.
Lastly, the creation of real estate to ‘mitigate’ or offset the cost of the project as proposed by VMSS has to be validated by the ‘need’ of land for development. There are ample properties in Vadodara that are vacant or ‘for investment’ purposes. The residents of Vadodara are paying the costs of such dead investment. Further, clearing the vegetation and building the banks would only add to the heat island effect and micro-climate of the city.
The river and the lake systems offer a tremendous opportunity to reduce pollution, increase green cover and hence our ground water table. However, in the absence of holistic planning, application of legal mechanisms and scientific thought this opportunity will be thrown to the wind and there will be no river, nor riverfront, left to speak of.
The urgent matter at hand is that the VMSS has commenced work on the impugned Riverfront Project. However, no EIA, Social Impact Assessment, environmental public hearing, nor any steps in preparing a management plan, including appraisal, monitoring and compliance mechanism have been undertaken by the VMSS for the impugned project.
Under these circumstances the competent authorities in the Government of India and the Gujarat government should...
Direct the VMSS to take adequate and necessary measures to ensure stoppage of any further work in the ‘Vishwamitri Riverfront Development Project’, or any component thereof.
Direct the VMSS to stop the untreated municipal sewage from being dumped into the river.
Direct the VMSS to remove the municipal waste which has been dumped into the ravine of Vishwamitri River and take steps to prevent the further dumping of the same.
Initiate legal action under Sections 15 and 16 of the Environmental (Protection) Act 1986 against the concerned individuals and companies that have started work or given permission for work of Vishwamitri Riverfront Project, or any component thereof.
Initiate legal action under Section 17 of the Environment (Protection) Act 1986 against the concerned officers who have failed to ensure complete compliance of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 before allowing commencement of the work in respect of Vishwamitri Riverfront Development Project.
Direct the VMSS to submit the status report of present Vishwamitri Riverfront Development Project like money spent for the project and activities on the site carried out by them up till now and based on that direct them to take all necessary steps for restitution of the project area to its status quo ante.
As the Project has already displaced more than 5,000 people and many more are going to be displaced by the Riverfront Project, declare such activities carried out by the VMSS as illegal and initiate legal action against the concerned officers for such an illegal act as no activities of project can be carried out before the environment clearance is obtain by the authorities. Direct them to take all necessary steps for restitution of the project area to its status quo ante.

All activities for the Vishwamitri Riverfront Development Project should be ceased, no further work should be commenced until due process of environmental clearance is undertaken. If project activities are not immediately stopped, it would invite legal action.

*With Paryavaran Suraksha Samiti

Comments

TRENDING

From algorithms to exploitation: New report exposes plight of India's gig workers

By Jag Jivan   The recent report, "State of Finance in India Report 2024-25," released by a coalition including the Centre for Financial Accountability, Focus on the Global South, and other organizations, paints a stark picture of India's burgeoning digital economy, particularly highlighting the exploitation faced by gig workers on platform-based services. 

'Condonation of war crimes against women and children’: IPSN on Trump’s Gaza Board

By A Representative   The India-Palestine Solidarity Network (IPSN) has strongly condemned the announcement of a proposed “Board of Peace” for Gaza and Palestine by former US President Donald J. Trump, calling it an initiative that “condones war crimes against children and women” and “rubs salt in Palestinian wounds.”

Gig workers hold online strike on republic day; nationwide protests planned on February 3

By A Representative   Gig and platform service workers across the country observed a nationwide online strike on Republic Day, responding to a call given by the Gig & Platform Service Workers Union (GIPSWU) to protest what it described as exploitation, insecurity and denial of basic worker rights in the platform economy. The union said women gig workers led the January 26 action by switching off their work apps as a mark of protest.

India’s road to sustainability: Why alternative fuels matter beyond electric vehicles

By Suyash Gupta*  India’s worsening air quality makes the shift towards clean mobility urgent. However, while electric vehicles (EVs) are central to India’s strategy, they alone cannot address the country’s diverse pollution and energy challenges.

Jayanthi Natarajan "never stood by tribals' rights" in MNC Vedanta's move to mine Niyamigiri Hills in Odisha

By A Representative The Odisha Chapter of the Campaign for Survival and Dignity (CSD), which played a vital role in the struggle for the enactment of historic Forest Rights Act, 2006 has blamed former Union environment minister Jaynaynthi Natarjan for failing to play any vital role to defend the tribals' rights in the forest areas during her tenure under the former UPA government. Countering her recent statement that she rejected environmental clearance to Vendanta, the top UK-based NMC, despite tremendous pressure from her colleagues in Cabinet and huge criticism from industry, and the claim that her decision was “upheld by the Supreme Court”, the CSD said this is simply not true, and actually she "disrespected" FRA.

Stands 'exposed': Cavalier attitude towards rushed construction of Char Dham project

By Bharat Dogra*  The nation heaved a big sigh of relief when the 41 workers trapped in the under-construction Silkyara-Barkot tunnel (Uttarkashi district of Uttarakhand) were finally rescued on November 28 after a 17-day rescue effort. All those involved in the rescue effort deserve a big thanks of the entire country. The government deserves appreciation for providing all-round support.

Whither space for the marginalised in Kerala's privately-driven townships after landslides?

By Ipshita Basu, Sudheesh R.C.  In the early hours of July 30 2024, a landslide in the Wayanad district of Kerala state, India, killed 400 people. The Punjirimattom, Mundakkai, Vellarimala and Chooralmala villages in the Western Ghats mountain range turned into a dystopian rubble of uprooted trees and debris.

Over 40% of gig workers earn below ₹15,000 a month: Economic Survey

By A Representative   The Finance Minister, Nirmala Sitharaman, while reviewing the Economic Survey in Parliament on Tuesday, highlighted the rapid growth of gig and platform workers in India. According to the Survey, the number of gig workers has increased from 7.7 million to around 12 million, marking a growth of about 55 percent. Their share in the overall workforce is projected to rise from 2 percent to 6.7 percent, with gig workers expected to contribute approximately ₹2.35 lakh crore to the GDP by 2030. The Survey also noted that over 40 percent of gig workers earn less than ₹15,000 per month.

Fragmented opposition and identity politics shaping Tamil Nadu’s 2026 election battle

By Syed Ali Mujtaba*  Tamil Nadu is set to go to the polls in April 2026, and the political battle lines are beginning to take shape. Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s visit to the state on January 23, 2026, marked the formal launch of the Bharatiya Janata Party’s campaign against the ruling Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK). Addressing multiple public meetings, the Prime Minister accused the DMK government of corruption, criminality, and dynastic politics, and called for Tamil Nadu to be “freed from DMK’s chains.” PM Modi alleged that the DMK had turned Tamil Nadu into a drug-ridden state and betrayed public trust by governing through what he described as “Corruption, Mafia and Crime,” derisively terming it “CMC rule.” He claimed that despite making numerous promises, the DMK had failed to deliver meaningful development. He also targeted what he described as the party’s dynastic character, arguing that the government functioned primarily for the benefit of a single family a...