Skip to main content

Australian greens accuse Adani Group of making "false promises" of economic benefits from coalmining project

A GetUp! poster against Adanis in Australia
By A Representative
In a development which may go a long way adversely the powerful industrial group of Adanis’, currently involved in a legal tangle in a land court in Australia’s Queensland province for obtaining permission to go ahead with one of the world’s biggest coalmining projects, the British daily Guardian has reported the “Indian conglomerate” has admitted it will not be able to “generate” 10,000 jobs it had previously promised.
“Australia’s largest coalmine would deliver only a fraction of the jobs and state government payments promised by the company, Queensland’s land court has heard”, daily says.

It adds, “The Carmichael mine in central Queensland and the related Abbot Point coal port would generate 1,464 jobs and up to $4.8bn in royalties, an expert economic witness for Adanis has told the court”.
The daily quotes Jerome Fahrer, an economic consultant commissioned by Adanis to model the outputs of its proposed 30-year coalmine, as telling the court that state royalties to Queensland would “range from $3.7bn to $4.8bn when discounting for inflation”, adding “His modelling also shows a total of 1,464 jobs, which includes related indirect jobs generated by the mine, over 30 years.”
“The figures are a far cry from the 10,000 jobs and $22bn Adani has used in seeking government approval for the mine and a public relations campaign aimed at negating public opposition over its impact on the Great Barrier Reef through shipping and emissions”, the daily, which is the winner of Pulitzer Prize for 2014, said.
“The company’s projections were endorsed as recently as last week by the new state Labour government in justifying its qualified support of the mine”, the Guardian says, adding, “The new figures were revealed on Monday during a cross-examination of Adani witness Fahrer by barrister Saul Holt for the conservation group Coast and Country.”
Australian conservationists have gone to the land court seeking it recommend refusal of Adanis’ applications for an environmental approval and a mining lease for the $10 billion project. The news that only a “fraction” of the promised jobs would be created has led top environmental group GetUp! to declare that this is yet another proof that that Adanis can't be trusted. It has said, “There was one argument left in favour of it - jobs. Now we know they don't exist.”
Meanwhile, an Adanis’ spokesman went in for a firefighting mode in Australia, saying the company stood by its “commitment to deliver $22bn in taxes and royalties for Queensland”, adding, the “full context of Dr Fahrer’s modelling and its assumptions have not been disclosed”.
“The land court process relates to the economic benefits of the mine at Carmichael – it does not envisage the combined tax and royalty, direct and indirect, construction and operational job benefits of Adani’s mine, rail and port projects,” he said.
“It’s highly problematic that we don’t have government agencies that undertake and scrutinise this work and it’s really reliant on organisations or landholders or companies impacted by the proposed development to have to undertake this themselves”, he added.
Another Australian daily, the Sydney Morning Herald, meanwhile, has said that the Adani Group is facing a strong challenge from “a conservation group in the land court of Queensland to stop it proceeding with its $10 billion Galilee Basin thermal coal mine and infrastructure project.” It adds, “Taking the stand on Friday was Adani Mining's financial controller Rajesh Gupta whose performance when cross-examined ranged from unconvincing to embarrassingly vague and forgetful.”
“Among the key things to emerge so far: Adani had previously announced the conditional sale of T1, its terminal at Abbot Point, to the Bombay Stock Exchange. Now, as revealed earlier this year by Fairfax Media, Adani has confirmed the sale has not happened”, the daily reports.

Comments

TRENDING

How strategic is India's commercial expansion in the Mediterranean?

By Vijay Prashad  On 26 October 2026, Greece’s foreign minister George Gerapetritis stood at the United Nations headquarters and rejected the maritime agreement between Turkey and Libya. Gerapetritis spoke on behalf of Greece of course, but also Bahrain, Cyprus, Egypt, the European Union, and the United Arab Emirates. Five days later, the Indian frigate INS Trishul entered Souda Bay in Crete as part of activities with the US Navy installation (Naval Support Activity) and with the NATO Maritime Interdiction Operational Training Centre. The sequence illuminates a developing strategic geography: India’s naval reach, its confrontation with Pakistan’s new Turkish partner, and its ambition to connect Indian capital to European markets increasingly converge in the eastern Mediterranean.

India among targets as China-linked hackers 'exploit' VPNs, firewalls

Counterview News   Cyberattackers grew faster and harder to detect in 2025, increasingly slipping through trusted systems rather than breaking in with obvious malware, claims U.S.-based  cybersecurity technology company CrowdStrike's 2026 Global Threat Report . The report says adversaries "grew more evasive than ever before," exploiting trust in supply chain partners, legitimate software, internal systems and employees. CrowdStrike now tracks 281 adversaries after naming 24 new ones in 2025, plus 150 activity clusters and emerging threat groups.

The Modi-Adani relationship: Corporate power, political proximity and accountability

By Mohd. Ziyaullah Khan   India's economic transformation over the past decade has been marked by ambitious infrastructure projects, increased global investment and the emergence of powerful corporate conglomerates. Alongside this growth, however, concerns about crony capitalism, the concentration of economic power and the influence of political connections on business opportunities have become increasingly prominent.