Skip to main content

Turning a blind eye to discrimination towards impoverished people in schools

By Venkatesh Nayak*
The print media has been reporting serious lapses in the implementation of the Right to Education Act, 2009 (RTE Act) over the last few months. A major problem is the reluctance of some State Governments and elite schools to fulfill the obligations towards students belonging to economically weaker sections (EWS) of society. Pls see detailed articles on this subject published in “Outlook” and The Economic and Political Weekly (EPW):
1) http://www.outlookindia.com/article/Colour-Coded-Discrimination/291806. A copy of this article was attached to my RTI application as proof of information available in the public domain about discrimination against economically weaker sections (EWS) children.
2) http://www.epw.in/system/files/pdf/2014_49/38/Quotas_under_the_Right_to_Education.pdf.
After reading these articles I filed a right to information (RTI) application with the Ministry of Human Resources Development (MoHRD). Initially the MoHRD transferred my RTI application internally and then fell silent. So I filed a first appeal. The First Appellate Authority ordered disclosure of all information. Now the public information officer (PIO) has replied with some information.
The main findings in the RTI reply are:
It looks like the MoHRD simply does not monitor the implementation of the RTE Act regarding EWS entitlements. They do not have any complaints in their files about discrimination against EWS children. They have passed the buck to the National Commission for the Protection of Child Rights (NCPCR) and SCPCRs (State Commissions) / RTE Protection Authority (REPAs) and do not even bother to collect data about how they are addressing complaints about discrimination.
After all under the Allocation of Business Rules, the RTE Act falls under the MoHRD’s charge. They cannot simply send money for implementing the Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan (SSA) and mid-day meal scheme and then not monitor how schools and States are implementing the RTE Act. Interestingly, the MoHRD gave a similar reply to a query raised in Parliament last month.
The reply to my second query in the RTI application shows that MoHRD does not even bother to take action suo motu when they read reports of the kind published in EPW and Outlook about discrimination against EWS children. They have simply transferred the responsibility to the monitoring bodies.
I can understand they may not be able to handle every complaint, but when investigative reporting is showing that an entire state like Uttar Pradesh is violating EWS clauses, is it not reasonable to expect that they should take some action on this issue? Instead the MoHRD seem to be busy trying to organise events to mark good governance day on December 25, 2014.
Without getting into the politics of it, I must say good governance is not only to be commemorated, but also practiced. The MoHRD must do this by properly monitoring the implementation of the RTE Act. The National Democratic Alliance (NDA) promised “Sabka Saath, Sabka Vikas”. Today, the educational sector is one of the major arenas where inclusion needs to be ensured. Inclusion is not merely permitting children from EWS sections of society to attend classes, but also participate in all activities to which other children from well off families have access.
By turning a blind eye to discriminatory practices in schools, the MoHRD will only create entire generations of people who will learn to treat the impoverished with contempt. It is important to ensure that all State Governments and schools act in a manner that will ensure the realisation of the constitutional vision of equality, justice and fraternity contained in the Preamble of our Constitution.
—
*Programme Coordinator, Access to Information Programme, Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative, New Delhi

Comments

TRENDING

Civil society at a crossroads: Service delivery vs. rights in the fight for social change

Counterview News   In the latest episode of the podcast Unmute , hosts Gagan Sethi and Minar Pimple convened a profound conversation with two veteran development practitioners to dissect a persistent tension within civil society: the perceived divide between service delivery and the struggle for rights. The episode, titled "Beyond Service Delivery: Civil Society, Rights, and the Politics of Social Change," featured Apoorva Oza , a development practitioner with decades of experience in rural development and institution-building, and Professor Dipa Sinha , a development economist known for her work on food, nutrition, gender, and social policy.

Bangkok IMF-World Bank meetings: New reports put India's debt, climate, accountability crisis in focus

Counterview News   As the World Bank and International Monetary Fund (IMF) concluded their Annual Meetings in Bangkok this week, civil society groups and policy experts outside the official proceedings released two critical documents challenging the institutions' legacy and prescriptions for Asia, calling for a fundamental overhaul of the global financial architecture.

European banks accused of coal double standard after shunning Adani’s Galilee mine in Australia

By Rajiv Shah    European banks that helped shut down Adani ’s Galilee Basin coal frontier in Australia a decade ago are now bankrolling a far larger coal expansion just 150 kilometres away, according to a new report from Reclaim Finance and partner NGOs. The study , "Coal Hypocrisy: European Banks’ Double Standard on Thermal and Metallurgical Coal in Australia", finds that 19 European banks provided US$30.3 billion to companies planning metallurgical coal expansion in Queensland’s Bowen Basin between 2021 and 2025, out of a total of US$105.9 billion from international banks.