Pressure from Gujarat powerdom forces JAAG to hold consultations on anti-SIR stir

By A Representative
Two senior leader of of Jameen Adhikar Aandolan Gujarat (JAAG), which is behind the campaign against the Mandal-Bhechraji special investment region (SIR), Lalji Desai and Sagar Rabari, have finally admitted that the movement they were leading today stands divided in the face of the powerful offensive launched by the Gandhinagar rulers. In a statement, they have explained how this happened starting with July 9.
The statement says, on July 9, some “selected individuals” started receiving phone calls from the Chief Minister’s Office (CMO) in Gandhinagar, as also some present and past members of legislative assembly (MLAs). The MLAs particularly began showing signs of activity. It was made known that selected individuals involved in the movement were being called to meet the chief minister. Apparently, these individuals had specific interests in keeping the SIR, where hundreds of hectares of land are proposed to be acquired from farmers.
Even then, the farmers collectively decided, though only a few selected leaders were invited to meet the chief minister, the issue was a collective one. Therefore, all sections of the leadership would go to Gandhinagar and meet him. In case the chief minister refused to meet all of them, no one would meet the CM. A meeting with the chief minister took place on July 10, where farmers’ leaders participated.
At the meeting, the chief minister tried to “satisfy” the leaders by saying that no area of the Narmada command would be disturbed, but refused to give any assurance of taking back the SIR Act, 2009, which was their main demand. He also promised he would announce something major on August 15.
On July 12, at a meeting in village Vasna, a few enthusiastic individuals wanted to write a letter to the chief minister expressing their displeasure, but they were advised by others to wait for some time. This was followed two days later with local TV channels flashing news that the JAAG had called off the agitation. Though the news channels were contacted and the headlines were discontinued, the divisions had already become obvious.
On July 15, a section of those who claimed to represent the region went to Gandhinagar demanding that the SIR plan should not be dropped at any cost. It is suspected, this was done at the instance of the Gandhinagar rulers. When those who are part of the Azad Vikas Sangathan, one of the organizations which is part of JAAG, came to this, they, together with Lalji Desai, went to Gandhinagar. With two sides opposing each other, the number of policemen posted in the state Capital suddenly shot up. Thankfully, there was no showdown, because of the presence of a section of some intellectuals. Both the he sides later went their own way.
“At present the women and the youth are continuing their mobilization efforts”, the JAAG statement says, adding, “The women especially have shown tremendous resolve in fighting to the finish and not parting with their land.”
Meanwhile, JAAG has decided to hold consultations on July 20 at Gujarat Vidyapeeth on what should they do in order to go ahead its proposed programme of action against the SIR for the August 9, 2013, which was announced earlier. Its statement said, “We have two options before us: (1) To go ahead with our plans for August 9, and (2) to wait for the CM’s assurance of result till August 15, the date when he has promised to announce something major on the SIR.

Comments

Countrywide protest by gig workers puts spotlight on algorithmic exploitation

By A Representative A nationwide protest led largely by women gig and platform workers was held across several states on February 3, with the Gig & Platform Service Workers Union (GIPSWU) claiming the mobilisation as a success and a strong assertion of workers’ rights against what it described as widespread exploitation by digital platform companies. Demonstrations took place in Delhi, Rajasthan, Karnataka, Maharashtra and other states, covering major cities including New Delhi, Jaipur, Bengaluru and Mumbai, along with multiple districts across the country.

CFA flags ‘welfare retreat’ in Union Budget 2026–27, alleges corporate bias

By Jag Jivan The advocacy group Centre for Financial Accountability (CFA) has sharply criticised the Union Budget 2026–27 , calling it a “budget sans kartavya” that weakens public welfare while favouring private corporations, even as inequality, climate risks and social distress deepen across the country.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

'Gandhi Talks': Cinema that dares to be quiet, where music, image and silence speak

By Vikas Meshram In today’s digital age, where reels and short videos dominate attention spans, watching a silent film for over two hours feels almost like an act of resistance. Directed by Kishor Pandurang Belekar, “Gandhi Talks” is a bold cinematic experiment that turns silence into language and wordlessness into a powerful storytelling device. The film is not mere entertainment; it is an experience that pushes the viewer inward, compelling reflection on life, values, and society.

From water scarcity to sustainable livelihoods: The turnaround of Salaiya Maaf

By Bharat Dogra We were sitting at a central place in Salaiya Maaf village, located in Mahoba district of Uttar Pradesh, for a group discussion when an elderly woman said in an emotional voice, “It is so good that you people came. Land on which nothing grew can now produce good crops.”

The Epstein shock, global power games and India’s foreign policy dilemma

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat* The “Epstein” tsunami has jolted establishments everywhere. Politicians, bureaucrats, billionaires, celebrities, intellectuals, academics, religious gurus, and preachers—all appear to be under scrutiny, even dismantled. At first glance, it may seem like a story cutting across left, right, centre, Democrats, Republicans, socialists, capitalists—every label one can think of. Much of it, of course, is gossip, as people seek solace in the possible inclusion of names they personally dislike.

Michael Parenti: Scholar known for critiques of capitalism and U.S. foreign policy

By Harsh Thakor* Michael Parenti, an American political scientist, historian, and author known for his Marxist and anti-imperialist perspectives, died on January 24 at the age of 92. Over several decades, Parenti wrote and lectured extensively on issues of capitalism, imperialism, democracy, media, and U.S. foreign policy. His work consistently challenged dominant political and economic narratives, particularly those associated with Western liberal democracies and global capitalism.

Paper guarantees, real hardship: How budget 2026–27 abandons rural India

By Vikas Meshram In the history of Indian democracy, the Union government’s annual budget has always carried great significance. However, the 2026–27 budget raises several alarming concerns for rural India. In particular, the vague provisions of the VBG–Ram Ji scheme and major changes to the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGA) have put the future of rural workers at risk. A deeper reading of the budget reveals that these changes are not merely administrative but are closely tied to political and economic priorities that will have far-reaching consequences for millions of rural households.

Penpa Tsering’s leadership and record under scrutiny amidst Tibetan exile elections

By Tseten Lhundup* Within the Tibetan exile community, Penpa Tsering is often described as having risen through grassroots engagement. Born in 1967, he comes from an ordinary Tibetan family, pursued higher education at Delhi University in India, and went on to serve as Speaker of the Tibetan Parliament-in-Exile from 2008 to 2016. In 2021, he was elected Sikyong of the Central Tibetan Administration (CTA), becoming the second democratically elected political leader of the administration after Lobsang Sangay.

Search This Blog