Skip to main content

How a village woman's courage gave rise to Gulabi Gang, a movement that spread across states

By Bharat Dogra 
When, as a young woman, Sampat Pal first resisted an act of violence against women in her home district of Banda, Uttar Pradesh, she could hardly have imagined that she was embarking on a journey that would lead to her work being highlighted not only in India's media but even in Western media. She would go on to receive prestigious awards and repeated requests to appear on prime-time TV shows. Sampat did not ask for this fame; it simply came her way as a result of her courageous interventions against various acts of injustice.
Before I went to meet her recently, I read several writings about her and found that she has often been portrayed as an instinctively violent personality. However, my impression of her during our long conversation was that of a highly dignified, polite, and gentle woman who may quickly become angry when confronted with acts of injustice, but who at heart is concerned primarily with creating a world free from such injustices. The most important lesson of her life is not the endlessly told stories of how she taught a lesson or two to those trying to trouble innocent women or indulging in corrupt activities. Instead, the main learning is how a big movement could start with a simple village woman, based on her sincerity and courage.
While Sampat's courage in taking up cases of violence against women initially attracted several women as well as others, she also showed wisdom in consolidating these gains by forming savings groups for women. These grew in strength, and soon there were about three hundred women as firm supporters. At this stage, they contributed small savings to purchase a pink saree for each one of them, giving them a pink identity that eventually led to the name "Gulabi (Pink) Gang"—a name that somehow stuck.
The Gulabi Gang soon expanded beyond tackling cases relating to violence against women. They also played a significant role in fighting corruption in the public distribution system and in checking irregularities in development work. This social movement also raised a strong voice against the increasing consumption of alcohol and smokeless tobacco/gutkha, and fought for the removal of some liquor vends. Sampat told me that she could persuade many men to give up alcohol.
Some aspects of this journey appear to have attracted women greatly, as the number of her supporters grew by leaps and bounds, despite several obstacles being placed in her path from time to time. Some accounts mention well over two hundred thousand members in Uttar Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh, with a support base in some other states as well. Several of these women have established a reputation for significant work in their own right, gaining a good reputation in their respective districts or work areas. Sampat Pal particularly mentioned the names of Pushpa Singh from Rae Bareilly, Uma Verma from Chhindwara, and Farida Begum from Mahoba.
After a journey of about two decades, Sampat Pal is also thinking of starting some service-based activities, although her main identity remains that of a fighter for justice and for just causes.
While most of the time she has been fighting for justice for women victims, she has not hesitated to come to the help of those men who have been wrongly accused or implicated by women in some cases. Her sense of fairness and justice is the deciding factor. Recently, in her home district of Banda, when one of the most sincere and courageous activists, Raja Bhaiya, was implicated in some cases and accusations, she was at the forefront of many distinguished persons as well as common villagers who came forward to support him in difficult times. Pointing to Raja Bhaiya's wife—a very soft-hearted village woman—and their three daughters, she asked loudly, with a flash of her famous anger showing at last: "Should we not be concerned about these women, who as family members of a badly victimized person—a sincere and good person—have suffered a lot?" Later, she was present at a public meeting that unanimously passed a resolution for ending the victimization of Raja Bhaiya, as well as the women and Dalit colleagues who have worked with him.
It is interesting and useful to note that while Sampat Pal may have lacked formal higher education, her learnings from the course of struggles, as well as her strong sense of fairness and justice, have led her to select issues and cases for support or resistance in a very thoughtful manner. This has played an important role in the fast, largely spontaneous spread of this social movement, without the availability of either organized or institutional funding or any formal support structure.
---
The writer is Honorary Convener of the Campaign to Save Earth Now. His recent books include Man over Machine and When the Two Streams Met. His website is bharatdogra.in

Comments

TRENDING

Sardar made up his mind on Pakistan in Dec 1946 "before" Mountbatten's Partition Plan

By Hari Desai* One has to be extra cautious while dealing with the history of towering personalities of the Indian freedom struggle, especially that of Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel (October 31, 1875 - December 15, 1950). Present-day politicians prefer to "pronounce” on his life and quote him according to their convenience like a blind person describing an elephant.

Beyond the Ayodhya theft: A tainted system, a crisis of trust

By Martin Macwan*   Recently, the issue of "theft of offerings at the Ayodhya Ram temple" has taken centre stage on social media. Whether "no theft occurred," or "this is the first such incident," or "the theft was limited only to cash" are now secondary questions, because the evidence has come not from the opposition, from people of other faiths, or from foreigners, but from ordinary devout believers, from saints and monks, and from sincere workers of the ruling party itself.

The Guardian controversy and the moral question of 12 years of Modi's leadership

By Mohd Ziyauallah Khan    A recent opinion article published in The Guardian , titled "Can Narendra Modi Accept Any Medal?", reignited a fierce debate about Prime Minister Narendra Modi's international recognition and the moral legacy of his leadership. The article argued that while Modi has received numerous state honours and awards from foreign governments, a more fundamental question remains unanswered: Can a leader be celebrated internationally while presiding over growing concerns about democratic decline, social polarization , and civil liberties at home? The controversy quickly spread across political and media circles. Supporters dismissed the article as biased, while critics argued that it reflected concerns already expressed by international democracy watchdogs , human rights organizations, and sections of the global press. Yet beyond political loyalties lies a deeper question: How should the success of a government be measured, especially when it...