Skip to main content

Rupee keeps tumbling, and will keep tumbling, so long as fundamentals remain unchanged

By Prof. Hementkumar Shah* 
The Indian rupee has once again fallen sharply against major foreign currencies, with the exchange rate touching around ₹88.15 to a U.S. dollar and ₹119.25 to a British pound last week. This decline is not unprecedented—the rupee has been losing value against foreign currencies since India gained independence. The question, however, is how fast and why it is falling this time.
In the global foreign exchange market, currencies are bought and sold based on demand and supply. When the demand for the U.S. dollar rises while its supply remains limited, its value naturally increases against the rupee. Economists call such a market-driven decline of the rupee “depreciation,” while a government-enforced reduction in value is termed “devaluation.” The current slide is depreciation, not devaluation, though in practical terms, both mean the rupee buys less and the dollar costs more.
The immediate reasons for this depreciation are twofold. First, the United States under President Trump has imposed a steep 50% tariff on Indian exports, which has only just taken effect. This will likely reduce Indian exports, worsen the trade balance, and increase reliance on foreign borrowing. As a result, India will need more dollars to pay for imports while earning fewer from exports, pushing up demand for the dollar.
Second, foreign portfolio investors have been withdrawing heavily from Indian equity markets. In this financial year alone, they have pulled out around $9.7 billion, converting their holdings back into dollars and repatriating them. In just two days recently, $1 billion worth of shares were sold off. These companies do not invest out of charity; they seek profit, and when they sense that India’s economic growth may slow—partly due to the U.S. tariffs—they exit quickly. With foreign capital fleeing, demand for dollars has shot up, pulling the rupee down.
The Reserve Bank of India has significant foreign exchange reserves—about $691 billion—but there are limits to how much it can intervene by selling dollars. Much of this reserve is borrowed, not earned through trade, and it has already shrunk by $4.39 billion in the past week. Reducing imports would be another way to ease dollar demand, but India’s history shows this is easier said than done. Since independence, there have been only two years—1972–73 and 1976–77—when import spending was less than export earnings. Even after the slogan of “Atmanirbhar Bharat” was raised in 2020, India has consistently imported more than it exports.
External debt adds to the problem. India’s foreign debt now stands at $736 billion, up sharply from $441 billion in March 2014. Repayments must be made in dollars, which only increases dollar demand and weakens the rupee further.
The conclusion is stark: unless imports are curbed and foreign debt reduced, the rupee will continue to weaken. The dollar touching ₹100 no longer seems an impossibility. For decades, wise voices have warned that a nation addicted to borrowing and spending beyond its means will face such currency crises. Today, India finds itself repeating that lesson—the rupee keeps tumbling, and will keep tumbling, so long as the fundamentals remain unchanged.
---
*Senior economist based in Ahmedabad 

Comments

TRENDING

Gujarat Information Commission issues warning against misinterpretation of RTI orders

By A Representative   The Gujarat Information Commission (GIC) has issued a press note clarifying that its orders limiting the number of Right to Information (RTI) applications for certain individuals apply only to those specific applicants. The GIC has warned that it will take disciplinary action against any public officials who misinterpret these orders to deny information to other citizens. The press note, signed by GIC Secretary Jaideep Dwivedi, states that the Right to Information Act, 2005, is a powerful tool for promoting transparency and accountability in public administration. However, the commission has observed that some applicants are misusing the act by filing an excessive number of applications, which disproportionately consumes the time and resources of Public Information Officers (PIOs), First Appellate Authorities (FAAs), and the commission itself. This misuse can cause delays for genuine applicants seeking justice. In response to this issue, and in acc...

A comrade in culture and controversy: Yao Wenyuan’s revolutionary legacy

By Harsh Thakor*  This year marks two important anniversaries in Chinese revolutionary history—the 20th death anniversary of Yao Wenyuan, and the 50th anniversary of his seminal essay "On the Social Basis of the Lin Biao Anti-Party Clique". These milestones invite reflection on the man whose pen ignited the first sparks of the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution and whose sharp ideological interventions left an indelible imprint on the political and cultural landscape of socialist China.

'MGNREGA crisis deepening': NSM demands fair wages and end to digital exclusions

By A Representative   The NREGA Sangharsh Morcha (NSM), a coalition of independent unions of MGNREGA workers, has warned that the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) is facing a “severe crisis” due to persistent neglect and restrictive measures imposed by the Union Government.

Gandhiji quoted as saying his anti-untouchability view has little space for inter-dining with "lower" castes

By A Representative A senior activist close to Narmada Bachao Andolan (NBA) leader Medha Patkar has defended top Booker prize winning novelist Arundhati Roy’s controversial utterance on Gandhiji that “his doctrine of nonviolence was based on an acceptance of the most brutal social hierarchy the world has ever known, the caste system.” Surprised at the police seeking video footage and transcript of Roy’s Mahatma Ayyankali memorial lecture at the Kerala University on July 17, Nandini K Oza in a recent blog quotes from available sources to “prove” that Gandhiji indeed believed in “removal of untouchability within the caste system.”

Targeted eviction of Bengali-speaking Muslims across Assam districts alleged

By A Representative   A delegation led by prominent academic and civil rights leader Sandeep Pandey  visited three districts in Assam—Goalpara, Dhubri, and Lakhimpur—between 2 and 4 September 2025 to meet families affected by recent demolitions and evictions. The delegation reported widespread displacement of Bengali-speaking Muslim communities, many of whom possess valid citizenship documents including Aadhaar, voter ID, ration cards, PAN cards, and NRC certification. 

'Centre criminally negligent': SKM demands national disaster declaration in flood-hit states

By A Representative   The Samyukt Kisan Morcha (SKM) has urged the Centre to immediately declare the recent floods and landslides in Punjab, Himachal Pradesh, Jammu & Kashmir, Uttarakhand, and Haryana as a national disaster, warning that the delay in doing so has deepened the suffering of the affected population.

Saffron Kingdom – a cinematic counter-narrative to The Kashmir Files

By Syed Ali Mujtaba*  “Saffron Kingdom” is a film produced in the United States by members of the Kashmiri diaspora, positioned as a response to the 2022 release “The Kashmir Files.” While the latter focused on the exodus of Kashmiri Pandits and framed Kashmiri Muslims as perpetrators of violence, “Saffron Kingdom” seeks to present an alternate perspective—highlighting the experiences of Kashmiri Muslims facing alleged abuses by Indian security forces.

From lazy to lost? The myths and realities behind generational panic about youth

By Bhabani Shankar Nayak   Older generations in many societies often describe the young with labels such as “lazy, unproductive, lost, anxious, depoliticised, unpatriotic or wayward.” Others see them as “social media, mobile phone and porn addicts.” Such judgments arise from a generational anxiety rooted in fears of losing control and from distorted perceptions about youth, especially in the context of economic crises, conflicts, and wars in which many young lives are lost.

'Govts must walk the talk on gender equality, right to health, human rights to deliver SDGs by 2030'

By A Representative  With just 64 months left to deliver on the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), global health and rights advocates have called upon governments to honour their commitments on gender equality and the human right to health. Speaking ahead of the 80th United Nations General Assembly (UNGA), experts warned that rising anti-rights and anti-gender pushes are threatening hard-won progress on SDG-3 (health and wellbeing) and SDG-5 (gender equality).