Skip to main content

Telangana ban on 16 civil rights groups: Govt has 'little regard' for dissent, civil rights

Telangana CM K Chandrashekhar Rao with Narendra Modi 
By A Representative 
The Telangana Praja Assembly (TPA), a coalition of rights organizations and people’s collectives and concerned citizens, have expressed “alarm” at what it has called “arbitrary and sweeping” decision of the Telangana government to declare 16 civil rights organizations as ‘unlawful’ at a time when the entire country is reeling under an “extra-ordinary pandemic” situation.
Signed by Jeevan Kumar of the Human Rights Forum; Meera Sanghamitra of the National Alliance of People’s Movements; Kanneganti Ravi of the Rythu Swarajya Vedika; P Shankar of the Dalit Bahujan Front; S Ashalatha of the Mahila Kisan Adhikar Manch; Ambati Nagayya of the Telangana Vidyavanthula Vedika; K Sajaya of the Caring Citizens’ Collective; M Raghavachary of the Palamuru Adhyayana Vedika; and R Venkat Reddy, a social activist, a TPA statement demanded that the state government “must withdraw GO-73 declaring 16 organizations as ‘unlawful’.”
The Telangana government issued the government order (GO) No 73 on March 30, 2021 under the Telangana Public Security Act, 1992. The GO No 73 immediately came into effect.
The statement said, as per Article 19(1)(c) of the Constitution of India, the freedom of association is available to every Indian citizen. “Thus, the declaration as ‘unlawful’ of entire organizations without any specific charge against specific individuals for violating law of the land is unacceptable and undemocratic”, it added.
It continued, “To support the contention of the state that all these groups are ‘front organizations’ of the outlawed Communist Party of India (Maoist), some of the many questionable ‘actions’ mentioned in the GO are that they have been ‘encouraging or aiding persons to commit acts of violence’, ‘activists of these front affiliates are moving in urban areas, adopting urban guerrilla tactics’, and they have ‘staged protests for repealing the UAPA, farm laws and CAA/NRC’.
Other accusations include their ‘demand to release of Vara Vara Rao, Prof GN Sai Baba, Rona Wilson etc’, and ‘joining hands with several organisations and alluring the members into their folds inciting inflammatory statements, meetings, and rallies highlighting various issues against the Central and State governments’ etc., the statement said.
Calling these accusations “vague and sweeping without any onus on the government to prove commission of unlawful actions”, the statement said, “Many of the reasons listed clearly indicate that the government does not want public-spirited organizations to raise awareness on people’s rights and the responsibility of the state.”
It asked, “How and why is it a crime to seek the release of political prisoners like Varavara Rao or Rona Wilson or Prof. Saibaba or protest against draconian laws like UAPA? When the entire country has been protesting the anti-farmer farm laws and even the Telangana government initially took this stand, how is protesting against these destructive laws a crime? When the Telangana assembly itself passed a resolution against the unconstitutional CAA-NRC-NPR, how does opposing this become a reason for declaring these organizations as ‘unlawful’?”
“Ever since the formation of Telangana in 2014, the attacks on the right to organize and dissent have been incessant”, the statement asserted, adding, “From the shameless closure of Dharna Chowk to the recent NIA raids on activists in the Telugu states, the democratic space to question the failures and excesses of the state in the past seven years have shrunk completely.”
Telangana govt issued GO No 73 on March 30 under the Telangana Public Security Act, 1992. The GO immediately came into effect
It demanded, instead of such acts, at a time when Telangana, like the rest of India “is also facing the most severe pandemic crisis and can ill-afford to divert its resources or focus elsewhere”, the government “must invest all its energies and attention in ensuring maximum vaccination, increasing beds, pharma and medicare support, blood, plasma, oxygen supply etc to the Covid affected.”

PFI, NCHRO protest move

In a statement, Popular Front of India (PFI) general secretary Anis Ahmed, taking “strong exception” to the Telengana government decision of banning 16 organizations, said, “The reasons set out in the controversial order are vague and strengthen the suspicion that it is a mere vindictive action by the state government against political dissent.”
It believed, “Denying space to function democratically in the society pushes people to loose faith in our cherished democratic values. If the government has evidence against an individual or an organization for committing anything illegal, it should have brought its case before a court of law and proved. Instead, such repressive action is a disturbing trend and is detrimental to a democratic society.”
Another civil rights group, the National Confederation of Human Rights Organisations (NCHRO), calling the state government move “authoritarian”, said, the 16 organisations including the well-known Revolutionary Writers’ Association, have been banned on account of their alleged connection with the banned Communist Party of India (Maoist) and with the government also claiming that these have been “involved” in inciting people against the government, and in adopting “urban guerrilla tactics”.
Insisting that “there is no evidence that has been presented to back these claims”, the NCHRO statement, signed by Prof P Koya, its general secretary, said, “The government has also egregiously claimed that the organisations have been banned because their members have been associated with the effort to release Professor GN Saibaba, who is 90% handicapped and has been in jail continuously since 2016.”
“Additionally”, it said, “The Telangana government cited the case of Elgar Parishad, also known as the Bhima Koregaon case, in which 15 activists, writers, academicians, etc. are currently in jail. The government said that the now banned organisations were involved in the effort to release Rona Wilson and Varavara Rao, who have been locked up in the said Bhima Koregaon case.”
NCHRO said, “The Elgar Parishad case that the government has cited as part of the justification for banning the said organisations, have been exposed as a patent fabrication. In an investigation by the ‘Washington Post’, it was revealed that the files were planted in the laptop of Rona Wilson, the same files that have been presented as key evidence for the guilt of the accused in the case.”

Comments

TRENDING

Grueling summer ahead: Cuttack’s alarming health trends and what they mean for Odisha

By Sudhansu R Das  The preparation to face the summer should begin early in Odisha. People in the state endure long, grueling summer months starting from mid-February and extending until the end of October. This prolonged heat adversely affects productivity, causes deaths and diseases, and impacts agriculture, tourism and the unorganized sector. The social, economic and cultural life of the state remains severely disrupted during the peak heat months.

Stronger India–Russia partnership highlights a missed energy breakthrough

By N.S. Venkataraman*  The recent visit of Russian President Vladimir Putin to India was widely publicized across several countries and has attracted significant global attention. The warmth with which Mr. Putin was received by Prime Minister Narendra Modi was particularly noted, prompting policy planners worldwide to examine the implications of this cordial relationship for the global economy and political climate. India–Russia relations have stood on a strong foundation for decades and have consistently withstood geopolitical shifts. This is in marked contrast to India’s ties with the United States, which have experienced fluctuations under different U.S. administrations.

From natural farming to fair prices: Young entrepreneurs show a new path

By Bharat Dogra   There have been frequent debates on agro-business companies not showing adequate concern for the livelihoods of small farmers. Farmers’ unions have often protested—generally with good reason—that while they do not receive fair returns despite high risks and hard work, corporate interests that merely process the crops produced by farmers earn disproportionately high profits. Hence, there is a growing demand for alternative models of agro-business development that demonstrate genuine commitment to protecting farmer livelihoods.

The Vande Mataram debate and the politics of manufactured controversy

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*  The recent Vande Mataram debate in Parliament was never meant to foster genuine dialogue. Each political party spoke past the other, addressing its own constituency, ensuring that clips went viral rather than contributing to meaningful deliberation. The objective was clear: to construct a Hindutva narrative ahead of the Bengal elections. Predictably, the Lok Sabha will likely expunge the opposition’s “controversial” remarks while retaining blatant inaccuracies voiced by ministers and ruling-party members. The BJP has mastered the art of inserting distortions into parliamentary records to provide them with a veneer of historical legitimacy.

A comrade in culture and controversy: Yao Wenyuan’s revolutionary legacy

By Harsh Thakor*  This year marks two important anniversaries in Chinese revolutionary history—the 20th death anniversary of Yao Wenyuan, and the 50th anniversary of his seminal essay "On the Social Basis of the Lin Biao Anti-Party Clique". These milestones invite reflection on the man whose pen ignited the first sparks of the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution and whose sharp ideological interventions left an indelible imprint on the political and cultural landscape of socialist China.

The cost of being Indian: How inequality and market logic redefine rights

By Vikas Gupta   We, the people of India, are engaged in a daily tryst—read: struggle—for basic human rights. For the seemingly well-to-do, the wish list includes constant water supply, clean air, safe roads, punctual public transportation, and crime-free neighbourhoods. For those further down the ladder, the struggle is starker: food that fills the stomach, water that doesn’t sicken, medicines that don’t kill, houses that don’t flood, habitats at safe distances from polluted streams or garbage piles, and exploitation-free environments in the public institutions they are compelled to navigate.

Why India must urgently strengthen its policies for an ageing population

By Bharat Dogra   A quiet but far-reaching demographic transformation is reshaping much of the world. As life expectancy rises and birth rates fall, societies are witnessing a rapid increase in the proportion of older people. This shift has profound implications for public policy, and the need to strengthen frameworks for healthy and secure ageing has never been more urgent. India is among the countries where these pressures will intensify most sharply in the coming decades.

Thota Sitaramaiah: An internal pillar of an underground organisation

By Harsh Thakor*  Thota Sitaramaiah was regarded within his circles as an example of the many individuals whose work in various underground movements remained largely unknown to the wider public. While some leaders become visible through organisational roles or media attention, many others contribute quietly, without public recognition. Sitaramaiah was considered one such figure. He passed away on December 8, 2025, at the age of 65.

New RTI draft rules inspired by citizen-unfriendly, overtly bureaucratic approach

By Venkatesh Nayak* The Department of Personnel and Training , Government of India has invited comments on a new set of Draft Rules (available in English only) to implement The Right to Information Act, 2005 . The RTI Rules were last amended in 2012 after a long period of consultation with various stakeholders. The Government’s move to put the draft RTI Rules out for people’s comments and suggestions for change is a welcome continuation of the tradition of public consultation. Positive aspects of the Draft RTI Rules While 60-65% of the Draft RTI Rules repeat the content of the 2012 RTI Rules, some new aspects deserve appreciation as they clarify the manner of implementation of key provisions of the RTI Act. These are: Provisions for dealing with non-compliance of the orders and directives of the Central Information Commission (CIC) by public authorities- this was missing in the 2012 RTI Rules. Non-compliance is increasingly becoming a major problem- two of my non-compliance cases are...