Skip to main content

Why was Hardik Patel's plea to suspend his conviction in a 2015 rioting case rejected?

Hardik Patel with Rahul Gandhi
By RK Misra*
While the Apex Court gave relief to a Gujarat Congress MLA regarding his disqualification, it denied urgent hearing of a plea from Hardik Patel of the same party, bringing into question his ability to contest the polls. In the space of just 24 hours, two leaders from Gujarat who looked for succour from the Supreme Court were left with different expectations.
In the first case, the court on April 1 stayed the Central Election Commission's (CEC) decision notifying the Talala assembly constituency seat in Gujarat as vacant and declaring by-polls there along with the Lok Sabha polls.
There was hurry in the process of law at all levels in disqualifying Congress legislator Bhagabhai Barad of Talala. In the second case, the Apex Court denied urgent hearing of a plea by Congress leader Hardik Patel to suspend his conviction in a 2015 rioting case and thereby put paid to his ambitions of contesting the Lok Sabha polls.
It all began in 1995 when an FIR was lodged against Barad which accused him of illegal mining of limestone worth Rs 2.83 crore in Sutrapada area. Almost 24 years later, on March 1, 2019, he was convicted by a court under Section 379 of the IPC to two years and nine months imprisonment. He was disqualified as an MLA by Gujarat assembly Speaker Rajendra Trivedi on March 5.
Barad challenged his conviction, and the principal district judge of Veraval town in Gir Somnath district, MM Babi, stayed it on March 9 and even allowed his plea seeking suspension of the sentence as well as bail until the pendency of the appeal. Soon after, the leader of the Congress Opposition in the Vidhan Sabha, Paresh Dhanani, met the Speaker and presented the Court order suspending his conviction alongside a memorandum seeking his reinstatement.
Apparently in a tearing hurry to get the Congress MLA out of the way, the BJP government moved the High Court on March 11, challenging the stay. On March 15, a single judge bench of Justice Sonia Gokani set aside the stay and asked the sessions court to once again apply its mind, noting that lower courts should stay convictions in only rare cases. However, the hearing in the sessions court could not take place as scheduled on March 25 as the judge went on leave till April 1.
Barad then approached a division bench of the High Court on March 11 but failed to get any relief. The bench ruled that conviction automatically leads to disqualification, so the seat stood vacated. Post this order, the by-election was to be held on April 23 along with the Lok Sabha elections to 26 seats in Gujarat. 
On March 28, Barad moved the Supreme Court, where a bench led by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi along with Justices Deepak Gupta and Sanjiv Khanna stayed the by-poll and issued a notice to the Election Commission.
The court took exception to the unusual hurry by the poll body in notifying the election and without taking notice of the stay then in existence. “How can you declare the seat to be vacant on March 10 when his conviction was stayed on March 7?” the bench asked.
While the Vijay Rupani-led BJP government in Gujarat showed great speed in the case of the Congress legislator, the same alacrity was not witnessed in the case of its own ministers. In June 2013, Union water resources minister Babubhai Bokhiria, who was sentenced to three years imprisonment by a Porbandar court in a Rs 54-crore illegal limestone mining case along with others did not face any disqualification. His conviction was also stayed by the sessions court. But the state government did not challenge it.
After the complaint against Bokhiria in 2006, he had left the country and was declared a proclaimed offender. The Porbandar police arrested him in 2007. The High Court later released him on bail. He contested the Vidhan Sabha elections in December 2012, defeated Gujarat Congress president Arjun Modhwadia and was made a cabinet minister in the Modi government.
Bhaga Barad, Dilip Sanghani, Parsottam Solanki, Babu Bokhiria
In November 2014, Bokhiria was acquitted in the case. At one point, he faced numerous criminal charges but the taint did not prevent him from rising in the ranks.
Then, there is the 2008 case of the Rs 400-crore fisheries scam when Dilip Sanghani and Parsottam Solanki were ministers in the Modi cabinet in Gujarat. Solanki, then minister of state for fisheries, and currently state minister for animal husbandry and cow protection, had granted fishing contracts for 58 reservoirs to his favourites. Sanghani was then agriculture minister.
There were allegations of corruption by both of them and an aggrieved contractor, Maradia, knocked the doors of the High Court, which then scrapped the Rs 2.4 crore contract granted by the minister. A repeat tender fetched Rs 45 crore. Maradia claimed that the loss to the exchequer over ten years was Rs 400 crore.
Maradia again approached the High Court seeking prosecution of Solanki. The matter turned controversial in 2012 when governor Kamla Beniwal granted sanction to prosecute Solanki. Wonder of all wonders, the government of anti-corruption crusader Narendra Modi, challenged her decision in the High Court but lost.
The case continues to be in litigation limping along at a snail’s pace. In December 2018, the High Court refused to quash lower court proceedings against the two and ordered them to appear before the Gandhinagar court in two weeks. Solanki, ailing with kidney complications, has not done so till date.
Solanki, incidentally, also figured in the Srikrishna Commission report on the 1993 Mumbai riots where he allegedly led the mobs. He is also a former TADA detainee but Modi had no qualms keeping him as a minister in his government. A warrant of arrest for non-appearance before a court is out for a sitting minister of the BJP government in Gujarat, yet not a fly stirs among the ruling elite crusading against corruption!
In the second case, the Supreme Court denied urgent hearing of a plea of Hardik Patel to suspend his conviction in a 2015 rioting case so that he could contest the Lok Sabha elections. A bench headed by Justice Arun Mishra and also comprising of Justices MM Shantanagoudar and Navin Sinha said there was no urgency in hearing the matter as the High Court order was passed in August last year. “The order was passed in August 2018. What is the urgency now?”, the bench said while refusing to give urgent hearing on the petition.
Hardik had moved the court after his plea for stay was rejected by Gujarat High Court last week. He was awarded a two-year jail term by a Visnagar court in July 2018 in connection with mob violence at BJP MLA Rishikesh Patel’s office in July 2015.
According to Hardik’s lawyer, he was not even present at the site of the violence but was held guilty under an Apex Court order that said that those individuals or organisations spearheading movements will be held accountable in cases of violence.
It is obvious that there are different strokes for different people under the BJP rule!
---
*Senior Gujarat-based journalist. Blog: http://wordsmithsandnewsplumbers.blogspot.com/

Comments

Post a Comment

TRENDING

Gram sabha as reformer: Mandla’s quiet challenge to the liquor economy

By Raj Kumar Sinha*  This year, the Union Ministry of Panchayati Raj is organising a two-day PESA Mahotsav in Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, on 23–24 December 2025. The event marks the passage of the Panchayats (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act, 1996 (PESA), enacted by Parliament on 24 December 1996 to establish self-governance in Fifth Schedule areas. Scheduled Areas are those notified by the President of India under Article 244(1) read with the Fifth Schedule of the Constitution, which provides for a distinct framework of governance recognising the autonomy of tribal regions. At present, Fifth Schedule areas exist in ten states: Andhra Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Gujarat, Himachal Pradesh, Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Odisha, Rajasthan and Telangana. The PESA Act, 1996 empowers Gram Sabhas—the village assemblies—as the foundation of self-rule in these areas. Among the many powers devolved to them is the authority to take decisions on local matters, including the regulation...
Post a Comment
»

MG-NREGA: A global model still waiting to be fully implemented

By Bharat Dogra  When the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MG-NREGA) was introduced in India nearly two decades ago, it drew worldwide attention. The reason was evident. At a time when states across much of the world were retreating from responsibility for livelihoods and welfare, the world’s second most populous country—with nearly two-thirds of its people living in rural or semi-rural areas—committed itself to guaranteeing 100 days of employment a year to its rural population.
Post a Comment
»

Policy changes in rural employment scheme and the politics of nomenclature

By N.S. Venkataraman*  The Government of India has introduced a revised rural employment programme by fine-tuning the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA), which has been in operation for nearly two decades. The MGNREGA scheme guarantees 100 days of employment annually to rural households and has primarily benefited populations in rural areas. The revised programme has been named VB-G RAM–G (Viksit Bharat Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission – Gramin). The government has stated that the revised scheme incorporates several structural changes, including an increase in guaranteed employment from 100 to 125 days, modifications in the financing pattern, provisions to strengthen unemployment allowances, and penalties for delays in wage payments. Given the extent of these changes, the government has argued that a new name is required to distinguish the revised programme from the existing MGNREGA framework. As has been witnessed in recent years, the introdu...
Post a Comment
»

Rollback of right to work? VB–GRAM G Bill 'dilutes' statutory employment guarantee

By A Representative   The Right to Food Campaign has strongly condemned the passage of the Viksit Bharat – Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission (Gramin) (VB–GRAM G) Bill, 2025, describing it as a major rollback of workers’ rights and a fundamental dilution of the statutory Right to Work guaranteed under the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA). In a statement, the Campaign termed the repeal of MGNREGA a “dark day for workers’ rights” and accused the government of converting a legally enforceable, demand-based employment guarantee into a centralised, discretionary welfare scheme.
Post a Comment
»

A comrade in culture and controversy: Yao Wenyuan’s revolutionary legacy

By Harsh Thakor*  This year marks two important anniversaries in Chinese revolutionary history—the 20th death anniversary of Yao Wenyuan, and the 50th anniversary of his seminal essay "On the Social Basis of the Lin Biao Anti-Party Clique". These milestones invite reflection on the man whose pen ignited the first sparks of the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution and whose sharp ideological interventions left an indelible imprint on the political and cultural landscape of socialist China.
Post a Comment
»

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.
59 comments
»

Making rigid distinctions between Indian and foreign 'historically untenable'

By A Representative   Oral historian, filmmaker and cultural conservationist Sohail Hashmi has said that everyday practices related to attire, food and architecture in India reflect long histories of interaction and adaptation rather than rigid or exclusionary ideas of identity. He was speaking at a webinar organised by the Indian History Forum (IHF).
Post a Comment
»

India’s Halal economy 'faces an uncertain future' under the new food Bill

By Syed Ali Mujtaba*  The proposed Food Safety and Standards (Amendment) Bill, 2025 marks a decisive shift in India’s food regulation landscape by seeking to place Halal certification exclusively under government control while criminalising all private Halal certification bodies. Although the Bill claims to promote “transparency” and “standardisation,” its structure and implications raise serious concerns about religious freedom, economic marginalisation, and the systematic dismantling of a long-established, Muslim-led Halal ecosystem in India.
Post a Comment
»

From jobless to ‘job-loss’ growth: Experts critique gig economy and fintech risks

By A Representative   Leading economists and social activists gathered in the capital on Friday to launch the third edition of the State of Finance in India Report 2024-25 , issuing a stark warning that the rapid digitalization of the Indian economy is eroding welfare systems and entrenching "digital dystopia." 
Post a Comment
»