Skip to main content

Suspense around who organized Dalits' April 2 Bharat bandh, which led to 9 deaths; "outsider" hand suspected

The "unidentified" Gwalior man
By A Representative
While the violence during the Bharat bandh against the recent Supreme Court ruling of the Prevention of Atrocities (POA) Act led to the death of nine persons, seven of them Dalits, ironically, top Dalit leader, Prakash Ambedkar, who happens to be the grandson of India’s Dalit icon BR Ambedkar, has asserted that suspense remains as to how the all-India protest was organized.
Ambedkar’s suspicion comes amidst a video going viral on social media showing an unidentified man holding a pistol, hiding behind a wall, and firing in Gwalior even as the Dalits were protesting in the city for their rights. There is no clarity on who shot the video.
Among others, senior journalist Rajdeep Sardesai seemed to agree with the theory that there was “outsider” hand behind the violence. He said, the Gwalior man with the gun in the photograph which went into circulation was an upper caste. “So my question is: Who fuelled the violence during today's bandh and to whose benefit?”, he asked.
Insisting that there was a need to probe on how the deaths in during the Bharat bandh took place, Ambedkar said, he was in talks with several Dalit organisations for a bandh which he proposed for April 9. Even when the talks were on, a message for a bandh call began being circulated for April 2.
According to Ambedkar, in no time the call for bandh on April 2 “went viral” with at least 15-20,000 Dalit organisations all over north India endorsed it. He added, no one owned the message, and despite effort he was unable trace it to an original source.
Pointing out that this only goes to suggest how spontaneous Dalit anger was, Ambedkar said, protests took place without any coordination committee, or discussion, or even a resolution of demands. Dalits came out on the roads in a spontaneous’ outburst. The anger was real and palpable.
Even as insisting that the role of ‘outsiders’ involvement should be probed, Ambedkar said, the anger became widespread because the government remained silent on what it proposed to do with regard to POA Act at a time when there was a hike in the atrocities against the Dalits.
Ambedkar further said, this anger was further stoked by the active participation of Hindutva organisations in anti-Dalit violence in several states which has been taking place, adding this anger was more evident in north Indian states, which bore the brunt of the violence on April 2.
Ambedkar believed, the Dalits were merely responding to the government’s silence on the atrocities committed against them, with the courts dilution of the POA Act coming as the proverbial last straw.
Meanwhile, reports are pouring in to suggest that Central agencies are in the dark as to whether it was Bhim Army, National Confederation for Dalit Organisations (NACDOR) or an unidentified Dalit youth, who may have given the call through a WhatsApp message for Bharat Bandh around a week ago.
India’s top security brass went into huddle as millions of demonstrators from Dalit organisations, carrying signs with slogans like "Country will be govern by Constitution and not fascism", descended on the streets across the country on Monday, opposing Supreme Court ruling on the POA Act.
However, said keen observers, one thing that clearly emerged all through was, India’s law enforcement machinery, including its local intelligence units, failed to assess the situation on the ground.

Comments

TRENDING

Civil society at a crossroads: Service delivery vs. rights in the fight for social change

Counterview News   In the latest episode of the podcast Unmute , hosts Gagan Sethi and Minar Pimple convened a profound conversation with two veteran development practitioners to dissect a persistent tension within civil society: the perceived divide between service delivery and the struggle for rights. The episode, titled "Beyond Service Delivery: Civil Society, Rights, and the Politics of Social Change," featured Apoorva Oza , a development practitioner with decades of experience in rural development and institution-building, and Professor Dipa Sinha , a development economist known for her work on food, nutrition, gender, and social policy.

Grain vs. gasoline: How the global biofuel boom threatens India’s food and water security

By Rajiv Shah  A new report published by the international research and advocacy organization GRAIN has warned that the global resurgence of biofuels is triggering a dangerous dynamic of “more fuel, less food, more land grabs.” Driven by intersecting energy security concerns, geopolitical tensions, and aggressive decarbonization mandates, the expanding agrofuel industry is increasingly pitting corporate energy interests against global food security and indigenous land rights. 

Sikkim governor row: ALIFA asks centre to explain hurried appointment in Ankita Bhandari case

By A Representative   The All-India Feminist Alliance (ALIFA) on Saturday expressed “immense pain and outrage” that even after four years and a national uproar, justice has not been fully delivered in the Ankita Bhandari murder case and that a ruling party politician facing allegations has been “gifted a high-ranking constitutional office.” In a statement, ALIFA extended “unflinching solidarity” to Ankita’s parents, who it said are “fighting for justice on the streets of Delhi,” and demanded that pending the CBI inquiry and judicial decision, the appointment of BJP leader Dushyant Kumar Gautam as Sikkim’s Governor be subject to “immediate presidential review.”