Skip to main content

Gujarat's developmental expenditure to grow 2% in 2018-19, non-developmental by 20%

By Jag Jivan  
Gujarat budget papers released by the state government in the assembly on Tuesday suggest that while the “developmental” expenditure for the forthcoming financial year, 2018-19, would rise by just about 2.46% over the previous year, 2017-18, the “non-developmental” expenditure, on the other hand, would grow by a whopping 20.2%.
If the budget papers are any guide, while making allocation for the developmental sector, the government has to set aside funds for such sectors like education, health, water supply and sanitation, welfare of scheduled castes and tribes, labour welfare, nutrition, agriculture and rural development, irrigation and flood control, energy, industry and mines and science and technology.
On the other hand, the funds allocated for non-developmental sector go towards the payment of mainly interest on loans taken by the government, payment of public debts, pension and other retirement benefits, and so on.
Interestingly, developmental expenditure is shown to have grown by a whopping 21.79% in the outgoing financial year, 2017-18 (as against 2.46% in the new financial year). However, even here, in 2017-18, the non-developmental expenditure is expected to rise by an even proportion – 26.69%.
The budget papers further show that the percentage growth in the funds available for developmental expenditure is the lowest in 2018-19 in four years. Thus, while it is estimated to grow by 21.79% in 2017-18, it rose by 4.32% in 2016-17, and 4.84% in 2015-16. This is against 26.69% rise in non-developmental expenditure in 2017-18, 13.38% in 2016-17 and 17.95% in 2015-16.
The sharp deceleration in the growth of developmental expenditure comes amidst the Gujarat government’s budgetary papers claiming that they account for 61.06% of the total budget size – Rs 1,11,564.97 crore out of Rs 1,82,728.16 crore.
Ironically, previous budgetary papers show that the deceleration in the proportion of allocation towards developmental expenditure began with the budget for 2017-18, which was presented in the state assembly a year ago. Thus, the developmental expenditure in 2017-18 is 60.50% of the total budget, almost equal to the budget for 2018-19, but it was 67.60% in 2016-17, 70.42%, 70.42% in 2015-16, and 70.90% in 2014-15.
Notably, the Gujarat government, while calculating the developmental expenditure, does not just include allocation for making the socio-economic sector life of the people more robust than what it has been in Gujarat, considering the state’s poor rating in the social sector.
It seeks to divide developmental expenditure under two heads – revenue and capital. As one financial analyst put it, an expenditure which neither creates assets nor reduces liability is called revenue expenditure”, and includes payment of salaries of employees and subsidies. These expenditures are financed out of revenue receipts, and are considered the first priority.
As for capital expenditure it either creates an asset (e.g., school building) and purchase of land, buildings, machinery, investment in shares, loans by Central government to state government, and so on.
In the state budget for 2018-19, while the revenue expenditure for the developmental sector is put at Rs 82,443.37 crore, on the capital side it is just 29,121.60 crore. Capital expenditure, which would show infrastructure development, physical or social, and is considered necessary for growth, forms only 26.01% of the total Rs 1,11,564.97 crore developmental expenditure.

Comments

Uma said…
All BJP does is criticise and blame Congress. What about their own governance, or lack of it, notably in Gujarat? I am sure the same thing is going to happen in all the states they rule--just give them a couple of years more.

TRENDING

Countrywide protest by gig workers puts spotlight on algorithmic exploitation

By A Representative   A nationwide protest led largely by women gig and platform workers was held across several states on February 3, with the Gig & Platform Service Workers Union (GIPSWU) claiming the mobilisation as a success and a strong assertion of workers’ rights against what it described as widespread exploitation by digital platform companies. Demonstrations took place in Delhi, Rajasthan, Karnataka, Maharashtra and other states, covering major cities including New Delhi, Jaipur, Bengaluru and Mumbai, along with multiple districts across the country.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

CFA flags ‘welfare retreat’ in Union Budget 2026–27, alleges corporate bias

By Jag Jivan  The advocacy group Centre for Financial Accountability (CFA) has sharply criticised the Union Budget 2026–27 , calling it a “budget sans kartavya” that weakens public welfare while favouring private corporations, even as inequality, climate risks and social distress deepen across the country.

From water scarcity to sustainable livelihoods: The turnaround of Salaiya Maaf

By Bharat Dogra   We were sitting at a central place in Salaiya Maaf village, located in Mahoba district of Uttar Pradesh, for a group discussion when an elderly woman said in an emotional voice, “It is so good that you people came. Land on which nothing grew can now produce good crops.”

When free trade meets unequal fields: The India–US agriculture question

By Vikas Meshram   The proposed trade agreement between India and the United States has triggered intense debate across the country. This agreement is not merely an attempt to expand bilateral trade; it is directly linked to Indian agriculture, the rural economy, democratic processes, and global geopolitics. Free trade agreements (FTAs) may appear attractive on the surface, but the political economy and social consequences behind them are often unequal and controversial. Once again, a fundamental question has surfaced: who will benefit from this agreement, and who will pay its price?

Paper guarantees, real hardship: How budget 2026–27 abandons rural India

By Vikas Meshram   In the history of Indian democracy, the Union government’s annual budget has always carried great significance. However, the 2026–27 budget raises several alarming concerns for rural India. In particular, the vague provisions of the VBG–Ram Ji scheme and major changes to the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGA) have put the future of rural workers at risk. A deeper reading of the budget reveals that these changes are not merely administrative but are closely tied to political and economic priorities that will have far-reaching consequences for millions of rural households.

Penpa Tsering’s leadership and record under scrutiny amidst Tibetan exile elections

By Tseten Lhundup*  Within the Tibetan exile community, Penpa Tsering is often described as having risen through grassroots engagement. Born in 1967, he comes from an ordinary Tibetan family, pursued higher education at Delhi University in India, and went on to serve as Speaker of the Tibetan Parliament-in-Exile from 2008 to 2016. In 2021, he was elected Sikyong of the Central Tibetan Administration (CTA), becoming the second democratically elected political leader of the administration after Lobsang Sangay. 

'Gandhi Talks': Cinema that dares to be quiet, where music, image and silence speak

By Vikas Meshram   In today’s digital age, where reels and short videos dominate attention spans, watching a silent film for over two hours feels almost like an act of resistance. Directed by Kishor Pandurang Belekar, “Gandhi Talks” is a bold cinematic experiment that turns silence into language and wordlessness into a powerful storytelling device. The film is not mere entertainment; it is an experience that pushes the viewer inward, compelling reflection on life, values, and society.

Frugal funds, fading promises: Budget 2026 exposes shrinking space for minority welfare

By Syed Ali Mujtaba*  The Ministry of Minority Affairs was established in 2006 during the tenure of Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, following the findings of the Sachar Committee, which documented that Muslims were among the most educationally and economically disadvantaged communities in India. The ministry was conceived as a corrective institutional response to deep structural inequalities faced by religious minorities, particularly Muslims, through focused policy interventions.