Skip to main content

Crucial environmental clearance steps removed from Govt of India agenda for "developmental" projects

Javdekar
Counterview Desk
In yet another move to “remove” alleged hurdles in the way of coming with “developmental” projects, the Government of India is all set to undermine Cumulative Impact Assessment (CIA) and Carrying Capacity Studies (CSS), which have been an important part of the environment impact assessment process of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986.
A recent letter written by a group of senior environmentalists a Delhi-based advocacy group to Union environment minister Prakash Javadekar has taken strong exception to not including CIA and CSS in the agenda of environmental clearance (EC) meetings held recently for projects proposed for several of the river basis projects.
Worse, the letter, signed by led by Himansh Thakker of the South Asia Network on Dams, Rivers & People (SANDRP), in alliance with 18 people’s organizations across India, says none of the draft CIA and CCS were made available in the public domain on the EC website of the Ministry of Environment and Forests and Climate Change (MoEF&CC).
Pointing out that this is clear from the agenda of the meetings declared for Environmental Clearance January 21 as also on February 8-9, the letter reveals, this is in pursuance of a “recent decision” of the Ministry not to put make public these documents, insisting, “This is a clear departure from the past practice” and “against the basic principles of transparent.”
The letter says, “Availability of these documents in public domain at least two weeks before the scheduled meeting of the Environmental Assessment Committee (EAC) is crucial for all concerned to be able to study these document and share their views about the adequacy or otherwise of the studies with the EAC”, adding, refusal to do so is nothing but an effort to “informed participation” of all concerned stakeholders in this process.
The letter goes on, this is also a violation of the order of Central Information Commission (CIC) dated January 18, 2012, which “specifically directed that all documents related to the EAC agenda must be in pubic domain, also required under Section 4 of RTI Act 2015.”
Insisting that “CIA and CCS are very important part of the decision making about the river basins and projects in river basins”, the letter says, “In the past the studies have left a lot to be desired and following inputs from many of us and others, the EAC has asked further work and studies in the CIA and CCS.”
The letter further tells the minister, “Conditions of environment clearance also stipulate that the clearance is subject to the final CIA/CCS. It is hence also imperative that public participation in the approval of CIA and CCS is ensured.” It adds, “The MoEF&CC Office Memorandum of May 28, 2013 about need for CIA and CCS also is crucial in this process.”
The refusal to make public CIA and CSS crucially comes at a time when, says a SANDRP source, when MoEF&CC “has been sanctioning cascades of hydropower projects on here-to free flowing rivers in the Himalaya and the North East.”
“Over 70 dams are planned for the rivers of the Upper Ganga Basin, 44 dams across the Siang Basin in Arunachal Pradesh famed for its pristine forests and biodiversity, 12 dams across the Lohit Basin, 19 for Subansiri basin. These are bumper to bumper projects, one starting where the other ends”, says SANDRP, adding, “The cumulative impacts of these projects on the hydrology, downstream flow, sudden water releases, deforestation, muck disposal, influx of migrant workers, seismicity of the region, etc., is huge.”

Comments

TRENDING

Civil society at a crossroads: Service delivery vs. rights in the fight for social change

Counterview News   In the latest episode of the podcast Unmute , hosts Gagan Sethi and Minar Pimple convened a profound conversation with two veteran development practitioners to dissect a persistent tension within civil society: the perceived divide between service delivery and the struggle for rights. The episode, titled "Beyond Service Delivery: Civil Society, Rights, and the Politics of Social Change," featured Apoorva Oza , a development practitioner with decades of experience in rural development and institution-building, and Professor Dipa Sinha , a development economist known for her work on food, nutrition, gender, and social policy.

Bangkok IMF-World Bank meetings: New reports put India's debt, climate, accountability crisis in focus

Counterview News   As the World Bank and International Monetary Fund (IMF) concluded their Annual Meetings in Bangkok this week, civil society groups and policy experts outside the official proceedings released two critical documents challenging the institutions' legacy and prescriptions for Asia, calling for a fundamental overhaul of the global financial architecture.

European banks accused of coal double standard after shunning Adani’s Galilee mine in Australia

By Rajiv Shah    European banks that helped shut down Adani ’s Galilee Basin coal frontier in Australia a decade ago are now bankrolling a far larger coal expansion just 150 kilometres away, according to a new report from Reclaim Finance and partner NGOs. The study , "Coal Hypocrisy: European Banks’ Double Standard on Thermal and Metallurgical Coal in Australia", finds that 19 European banks provided US$30.3 billion to companies planning metallurgical coal expansion in Queensland’s Bowen Basin between 2021 and 2025, out of a total of US$105.9 billion from international banks.