Skip to main content

Ahead of the stone-laying ceremony of Statue of Unity, activists, villagers "detained" off Narmada dam

By A Representative
In the wee hours, the powerful Gujarat government administration cracked down on activists and villagers around the Narmada dam who are protesting against the state government’s refusal to give any assurance to 70-odd villages that their land would not be acquired for the sake of the tourism project in the downstream of the dam. The crackdown took place ahead of Gujarat chief minister Narendra Modi’s stone-laying ceremony of the Statue of Unity, envisaged by him as the tallest statue in the world, about three times higher than New York’s Statue of Liberty. The stone laying ceremony is marked with the birthday of Sardar Patel, in whose memory the statue has been proposed.
Calling the crackdown as an attack on “right to freedom of expression”, environmental body Paryavaran Suraksha Samiti, Vadodara, one of the NGOs organizing the villagers’ protest, said in a statement that “activists and villagers detained and put under house arrest in wee hours of October 31”, because the Gujarat government did not want the “tribals and activists do not speak up when the chief minister was around.” If they spoke, they would be sent jail at Kevadia, the officials while detaining activists told them. It has lodged a formal protest to Justice KG Balakrishnan, chairman, National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) about the attitude of the state government curb activists' right to protest.
“The crackdown began on October 30, 2013, when four activists, Rohit Prajapati, Trupti Shah, Amrish Brahmbhatta, Sudhir Biniwale, were put under house arrest by the Rajpipla police even before they reached venue. They were followed by police vehicles right form Devalia Chokadi when they were travelling from Vadodara to Rajpipla. When they reached Rajpila, there were guards standing outside the town to stop the activists, as if they were criminals. No policemen talked with them as to why they were doing so, or what were the charges against them”, the statement said.
Shortly thereafter, the statement said, activists and villagers from several villages began being detained from their homes by the police, again without pressing any formal charges. “At midnight our activist Lakhan Musafir, Dhirendra Soneji, Dipen Desai, Rameshbhai Tadvi from Indravarna village, Shaileshbai Tadvi form Vagadia village, Vikrambhai Tadvi and two others form Kevadia and other villagers were detained illegally to create atmosphere of terror inside villages to prevent planned well-announced peaceful hunger strike in villages”, the statement said.
The statement further said, till 6 a.m. on October 31, “at least 10 activists from five villages were detained and taken to various police stations… We fear further more police action shortly. This statement is to communicate that we activist and villagers had only announced symbolic protest in our own houses by staging day long hunger strike. Note, we were not to assemble at any public place or sit on dharna at any public place”. The protest included beating of steel utensils in 70 villages to protest “wasteful” use of about Rs 2,500 crore for the Statue of Unity and the tourism project by acquiring land near the Narmada dam.
The statement added, “The sit -n protest in our own home was aimed at protecting our land, forest, livelihood and river. Only because Gujarat chief minister Narendra Modi is schedule to preside the programme for his plans for what he called the world’s highest statue, Statue of Unity, we had been denied the fundamental right to express our rights even in our own home. The statue of unity comes at what cost whose cost?”

NAPM condemns detention: 

Meanwhile, the National Alliance of People's Movements (NAPM) has condemned the detention of activists and villagers wanting to protest against the tourism project and the Sardar Statue, which they allege are being promoted to take away their land. NAPM has said, "The CM, by not permitting a peaceful fast by the representatives of adivasi villages, along with senior activists, Rohit Prajapati, Lakhan Musafir, Trupti Shah and others, with the local leaders, the government has, no doubt, expressed its cowardice even in the face of a peaceful protest."
The NAPM, which is the apex body of tens of human rights and environmental NGOs, has said, "The Statue is part of the overall plan to deprive the 70 adivasi villages of their constitutional status as adivasi villages in violation of the Panchayat (Extension of Scheduled Areas) Act obviously to be followed by grabbing of their land and natural resources and diversion of the same for unjustifiable ‘tourism’ purposes. It is absolutely condemnable that the government has arrested activists and villages who have been raising these genuine concerns."

Gujarat activists protest:

As many as 28 activists from Gujarat came together to protest against the “illegal” detention of Paryavaran Suraksha Samiti (PSS) members and villagers who were seeking to protest against the proposed tourism project and the Sardar Statue. “This is one of the clearest admissions by the chief minister and his team fear people’s voices and the entire administration bending over backwards to ‘protect’ the CM. The CM has always operated under fear and thus has clamped down hard on activists and rights defenders. This is one more instance of the CM not wanting to hear the people’s voices from his own state and not allowing them to be heard by the rest of the world”, a statement issued by them said.
It added, “Gujarat is today reeling under a state of “undeclared Emergency”, working much like the Congress dispensation in 1975. Summary detentions without charges, or on trumped up charges, routine denials of permissions for public demonstrations and protests, selected targeting of human rights and civil rights activists, name-calling and myth-making are the order of the day – and all these can be substantiated with evidence by us, unlike the CM who cannot substantiate a single charge that he makes against those he dislikes.”
The activists wants the CM to answer following questions:
1. Why was the police following the activists from Vadodara?
2. Why were Rohit Prajapati, Trupti Shah, Amrish Bhrambhatta and Sudhir Biniwale not allowed to get out of the RSSS campus and prohibited from proceeding to Kevadia?
3. Why are no charges framed against them?
4. Why were people from the villages in the Kevadia area rounded up on 30th evening?
5. What are the charges against them?
The statement was signed by Prasad Chacko, Mahesh Pandya, Persis Ginwalla, Hiren Gandhi, Prakash N. Shah, Sagar Rabari Fr. Cedric Prakash, Lalji Desai and others.

Comments

TRENDING

Grueling summer ahead: Cuttack’s alarming health trends and what they mean for Odisha

By Sudhansu R Das  The preparation to face the summer should begin early in Odisha. People in the state endure long, grueling summer months starting from mid-February and extending until the end of October. This prolonged heat adversely affects productivity, causes deaths and diseases, and impacts agriculture, tourism and the unorganized sector. The social, economic and cultural life of the state remains severely disrupted during the peak heat months.

Stronger India–Russia partnership highlights a missed energy breakthrough

By N.S. Venkataraman*  The recent visit of Russian President Vladimir Putin to India was widely publicized across several countries and has attracted significant global attention. The warmth with which Mr. Putin was received by Prime Minister Narendra Modi was particularly noted, prompting policy planners worldwide to examine the implications of this cordial relationship for the global economy and political climate. India–Russia relations have stood on a strong foundation for decades and have consistently withstood geopolitical shifts. This is in marked contrast to India’s ties with the United States, which have experienced fluctuations under different U.S. administrations.

From natural farming to fair prices: Young entrepreneurs show a new path

By Bharat Dogra   There have been frequent debates on agro-business companies not showing adequate concern for the livelihoods of small farmers. Farmers’ unions have often protested—generally with good reason—that while they do not receive fair returns despite high risks and hard work, corporate interests that merely process the crops produced by farmers earn disproportionately high profits. Hence, there is a growing demand for alternative models of agro-business development that demonstrate genuine commitment to protecting farmer livelihoods.

The Vande Mataram debate and the politics of manufactured controversy

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*  The recent Vande Mataram debate in Parliament was never meant to foster genuine dialogue. Each political party spoke past the other, addressing its own constituency, ensuring that clips went viral rather than contributing to meaningful deliberation. The objective was clear: to construct a Hindutva narrative ahead of the Bengal elections. Predictably, the Lok Sabha will likely expunge the opposition’s “controversial” remarks while retaining blatant inaccuracies voiced by ministers and ruling-party members. The BJP has mastered the art of inserting distortions into parliamentary records to provide them with a veneer of historical legitimacy.

A comrade in culture and controversy: Yao Wenyuan’s revolutionary legacy

By Harsh Thakor*  This year marks two important anniversaries in Chinese revolutionary history—the 20th death anniversary of Yao Wenyuan, and the 50th anniversary of his seminal essay "On the Social Basis of the Lin Biao Anti-Party Clique". These milestones invite reflection on the man whose pen ignited the first sparks of the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution and whose sharp ideological interventions left an indelible imprint on the political and cultural landscape of socialist China.

The cost of being Indian: How inequality and market logic redefine rights

By Vikas Gupta   We, the people of India, are engaged in a daily tryst—read: struggle—for basic human rights. For the seemingly well-to-do, the wish list includes constant water supply, clean air, safe roads, punctual public transportation, and crime-free neighbourhoods. For those further down the ladder, the struggle is starker: food that fills the stomach, water that doesn’t sicken, medicines that don’t kill, houses that don’t flood, habitats at safe distances from polluted streams or garbage piles, and exploitation-free environments in the public institutions they are compelled to navigate.

Why India must urgently strengthen its policies for an ageing population

By Bharat Dogra   A quiet but far-reaching demographic transformation is reshaping much of the world. As life expectancy rises and birth rates fall, societies are witnessing a rapid increase in the proportion of older people. This shift has profound implications for public policy, and the need to strengthen frameworks for healthy and secure ageing has never been more urgent. India is among the countries where these pressures will intensify most sharply in the coming decades.

Thota Sitaramaiah: An internal pillar of an underground organisation

By Harsh Thakor*  Thota Sitaramaiah was regarded within his circles as an example of the many individuals whose work in various underground movements remained largely unknown to the wider public. While some leaders become visible through organisational roles or media attention, many others contribute quietly, without public recognition. Sitaramaiah was considered one such figure. He passed away on December 8, 2025, at the age of 65.

Proposals for Babri Masjid, Ram Temple spark fears of polarisation before West Bengal polls

By A Representative   A political debate has emerged in West Bengal following recent announcements about plans for new religious structures in Murshidabad district, including a proposed mosque to be named Babri Masjid and a separate announcement by a BJP leader regarding the construction of a Ram temple in another location within Behrampur.