Skip to main content

Gujarat farm leaders join hands and decide to fight the bill meant to legitimize genetically modified seeds

By A Representative
Farmer leaders of Gujarat have come together in solidarity to express in one voice that they oppose the Biotechnology Regulatory Authority of India (BRAI) Bill. They have asserted that under no circumstances they can afford to lose their freedom and sovereignty and risk the takeover of their food, farms and livelihood by multinational companies like Monsanto. The meeting was attended by farmer leaders such as Badribhai Joshi of Gujarat Khedut Samaj, Prafulbhai Senjaliya of the Organic Farming Cell of Bharatiya Kisan Sangh, and Sarvadaman Patel, president, Organic Farming Association of India and Kapil Shah of the Jatan Trust.
The leaders were unanimous in their condemnation of the action of the Government of India of tabling this controversial Bill in the Lok Sabha on April 22, 2013, despite vociferous opposition to it inside and outside Parliament. The controversy didn’t end with the introduction of the Bill. Apparently the Minister for Science and Technology wanted the Bill to be sent to a Joint Committee, considering the impact of the Bill on food, farms, livelihoods, health, trade and environment. But the Bill was referred to the Standing Committee on Science and Technology.
"As the nation has grown the farmers have been weakened, slowly losing control over lives livelihoods. At the last count over 2,84,694 farmers have killed themselves in the last decade and a half due to acute distress, many of them cotton farmers. Now this Bill is further facilitating the takeover of farms and food by genetically modified (GM) crops/foods, propagated by large companies", a statement issued at the end of the meeting said.
"The Bill will result in a single window fast track approval mechanism for GM crops, which are a threat to human health, biodiversity and farm livelihoods. The Bill works in the interest of biotech seed companies by avoiding liability mechanisms or public scrutiny", the statement added,
“Is this government concerned about the farmers in the country? If so, why is this Bill being pushed with such haste without due consultations? There is not even an effort to translate the text of the Bill in local languages and making it accessible to farming communities around the country. How can a Bill that will affect farming seriously not be made available in local languages for farmers and groups like us to analyse and study its impacts on their livelihoods?", the statement worndered.
"How are we supposed to give feedback on this in 30 days during peak farming season? This very thoughtlessness and callousness of the government demonstrates that farmers don’t matter to the government,” said Bhogibhai Patel of the Gujarat Khedut Samaj.
“The Bill should be available in the public domain for feedback for at least 90 days, the text of the Bill should be made available in the local language and public consultations should be held in various locations so that farmers can express their views on GM technology and the Bill. We would like to point out that during Bt brinjal consultations in Ahmadabad farmers had attended in large numbers and expressed their views against GM crops. They have a right to do so again,” said Kapil Shah of Jatan Trust.
He added, “Biotechnology, particularly environmental release of GMOs, which comes under purview of BRAI is problematic with bans, moratoriums and other restrictions in many countries around the world. Serious problems have emerged in countries that have adopted it including negative trade impact, serious environmental problems (super-weeds and super-bugs), and massive losses for farmers due to contamination incidents. A compilation of over 400 studies which point to the problems with GMOs in agriculture has been put together by the Coalition for a GM-Free India.”
“We had enough bad experience with Bt cotton, there is no more choice left and all non-Bt cotton has been contaminated. We do not want anymore GM crops, the one GM crop that has been cultivated has already destroyed choice for organic cotton farmers. We can’t allow this technology to take over our livelihoods. With the advent of BRAI we will lose all control over our seeds. Already we are struggling to save seed, to preserve the purity of our seeds. With this there will be no choice left and we can’t allow it to happen,” said Sarvadaman Patel, President of the Organic Farming Association of India.
Badribhai Joshi of Gujarat Khedut Samaj said, “If this Bill is passed the biggest beneficiary is going to be Monsanto. With a single GM crop the company has already reaped over 1500 crores in royalty fees alone. With this Bill the money from rural India, from the pockets of farmers will flow into this company. This Bill is a Monsanto Protection Law. Therefore, we ask the government to drop the Bill.”
“The Bill has such draconian provisions. It puts biosafety data about GM crops outside the purview of right to information (RTI) law. Why should companies hide research data, do they have something to hide? Why is the govt making a regulatory body which facilitates this? Transparency is very important with technologies like GM, which are irreversible and have far reaching impact. Public interest is of utmost importance, particularly with regard to a technology which affects each and every one of us through our food, business confidentiality can’t be a reason for hiding vital data,” the joint statement said.
The gathering of leaders has decided on their course of action. They propose to have Sammelans, in Vadodara, Ahmedabad, Sabakantha and Bharuch. A signature campaign will be launched to collect signatures of MPs from the state. A Dharna is being planned for the last week of July in Gujarat which will culminate in “Chalo Delhi”, if government doesn’t respond by then.

Comments

TRENDING

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Walk for peace: Buddhist monks and America’s search for healing

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*  The #BuddhistMonks in the United States have completed their #WalkForPeace after covering nearly 3,700 kilometers in an arduous journey. They reached Washington, DC yesterday. The journey began at the Huong Đạo Vipassana Bhavana Center in Fort Worth, Texas, on October 26, 2025, and concluded in Washington, DC after a 108-day walk. The monks, mainly from Vietnam and Thailand, undertook this journey for peace and mindfulness. Their number ranged between 19 and 24. Led by Venerable Bhikkhu Pannakara (also known as Sư Tuệ Nhân), a Vietnamese-born monk based in the United States, this “Walk for Peace” reflected deeply on the crisis within American society and the search for inner strength among its people.

Four women lead the way among Tamil Nadu’s Muslim change-makers

By Syed Ali Mujtaba*  A report published by Awaz–The Voice (ATV), a news platform, highlights 10 Muslim change-makers in Tamil Nadu, among whom four are women. These individuals are driving social change through education, the arts, conservation, and activism. Representing diverse fields ranging from environmental protection and literature to political engagement and education, they are working to improve society across the state.

From water scarcity to sustainable livelihoods: The turnaround of Salaiya Maaf

By Bharat Dogra   We were sitting at a central place in Salaiya Maaf village, located in Mahoba district of Uttar Pradesh, for a group discussion when an elderly woman said in an emotional voice, “It is so good that you people came. Land on which nothing grew can now produce good crops.”

When free trade meets unequal fields: The India–US agriculture question

By Vikas Meshram   The proposed trade agreement between India and the United States has triggered intense debate across the country. This agreement is not merely an attempt to expand bilateral trade; it is directly linked to Indian agriculture, the rural economy, democratic processes, and global geopolitics. Free trade agreements (FTAs) may appear attractive on the surface, but the political economy and social consequences behind them are often unequal and controversial. Once again, a fundamental question has surfaced: who will benefit from this agreement, and who will pay its price?

Why Russian oil has emerged as the flashpoint in India–US trade talks

By N.S. Venkataraman*  In recent years, India has entered into trade agreements with several countries, the latest being agreements with the European Union and the United States. While the India–EU trade agreement has been widely viewed in India as mutually beneficial and balanced, the trade agreement with the United States has generated comparatively greater debate and scrutiny.

Trade pacts with EU, US raise alarms over farmers, MSMEs and policy space

By A Representative   A broad coalition of farmers’ organisations, trade unions, traders, public health advocates and environmental groups has raised serious concerns over India’s recently concluded trade agreements with the European Union and the United States, warning that the deals could have far-reaching implications for livelihoods, policy autonomy and the country’s long-term development trajectory. In a public statement issued, the Forum for Trade Justice described the two agreements as marking a “tectonic shift” in India’s trade policy and cautioned that the projected gains in exports may come at a significant social and economic cost.

Samyukt Kisan Morcha raises concerns over ‘corporate bias’ in seed Bill

By A Representative   The Samyukt Kisan Morcha (SKM) has released a statement raising ten questions to Union Agriculture and Farmers’ Welfare Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan regarding the proposed Seed Bill 2025, alleging that the legislation is biased in favour of large multinational and domestic seed corporations and does not adequately safeguard farmers’ interests. 

Why Venezuela govt granting amnesty to political prisoners isn't a sign of weakness

By Guillermo Barreto   On 20 May 2017, during a violent protest planned by sectors of the Venezuelan opposition, 21-year-old Orlando Figuera was attacked by a mob that accused him of being a Chavista. After being stabbed, he was doused with gasoline and set on fire in front of everyone present. Young Orlando was admitted to a hospital with multiple wounds and burns covering 80 percent of his body and died 15 days later, on 4 June.