Skip to main content

Submission Guidelines

​Counterview is an independent, voluntary initiative unaffiliated with any organization. We welcome original articles, news reports, analyses, and commentary on current affairs, public policy, human rights, and socio-economic developments.
​Our readership consists of civil society members, academics, professional experts, policymakers, journalists, and grassroots activists.
​1. Content & Editorial Standards
​- Fact-Driven & Timely: Submissions must be grounded in verified facts, data, and credible sources. Commentaries and op-eds should be anchored to recent events or ongoing policy debates; abstract essays lacking concrete evidence will not be accepted.
​- Tone & Objectivity: While we encourage incisive critique and analytical rigor, we do not publish partisan propaganda, promotional content, derogatory remarks, or hate speech targeting any community, individual, or political group.
​- Editorial Discretion: Counterview is an independent platform, not an activist or campaign vehicle. We reserve the right to edit, trim, or rewrite text and headlines to maintain editorial neutrality and clarity.
​- Originality: Plagiarized submissions will be rejected immediately. While original work is prioritized, we occasionally accept cross-posts if you hold the republishing rights and clearly disclose the original publisher.
​- Press Releases & Statements: Organizational statements, campaign releases, and communiqués will be adapted and processed as reported news items, not published as unedited viewpoint statements.
​2. Formatting & Style
​- Word Count: Submissions should ideally be under 1,000 words. Longer pieces may be edited for length or split into a series.
​Citations & References:
​- Hyperlink all digital secondary sources directly within the text.
​- Offline sources (print books, court orders, physical archives) should be cited in parentheses within the body text.
​Bylines & Author Bios:
​- Articles and blogs should include a brief one-line biography (name, profession, and affiliation). If you decline to provide a bio, an email address will be appended for reader feedback.
​- News reports submitted without an author byline will carry the credit “By A Representative.”
- ​Images: Authors are welcome to suggest images (original or Creative Commons-licensed). Send images as separate file attachments accompanied by relevant captions and photo credits.
​3. Rights & Remuneration
- ​Licensing: Published pieces are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) license, permitting republication for non-commercial purposes with appropriate credit, unless an alternate arrangement is explicitly requested in advance.
​- Voluntary Platform: Counterview operates as a non-funded, non-profit volunteer platform; we do not offer monetary compensation for accepted contributions.
​4. How to Submit
​Send your submission as an editable document (simple text, .docx or Google Doc) to: counterview.net@gmail.com
​Submitting a piece signifies your acceptance of these editorial policies and licensing terms.
Follow Us
X (Twitter): @CounterviewNet

TRENDING

Swaminarayan, untouchability and the 'we are not Hindu' argument

By Rajiv Shah   Following my blog on why the Eiffel Tower authorities should take all the blame for giving in to the Swaminarayan sadhus ’ bizarre demand to “invisibilise” women, including its female staff, during their visit to the internationally renowned Paris tourist centre on September 5, an interesting comment by one of the top academics drew my attention to something I vaguely knew about one of India’s most powerful and richest religious sects.
Post a Comment
»

From margins to microphones: The rise of Dalit hip-hop in India

By Tersina Maria Toppo*  A protest does not always arrive as a slogan shouted from a street corner. Sometimes, it arrives on a beat. A microphone replaces the megaphone, a music video becomes a public square, and the smartphone becomes the space where a history once pushed to the margins is narrated, debated, and shared.
Post a Comment
»

Xi Jinping’s visit to USA: Recognition that China can't be contained?

By Vijay Prashad   President Xi Jinping’s forthcoming visit to the United States must be understood as more than an encounter between two heads of state, but it must be seen as an encounter between two possible futures. In one future, the United States imposes a spiral of confrontation against China. Trade disputes harden into economic warfare, then economic warfare intensifies into technological blockades, technological blockades produce military encirclement, and finally military encirclement creates incidents, and incidents the danger of becoming an unimaginable war.
Post a Comment
»