Skip to main content

Left organisations pay tribute to public health professional and activist Suresh

By Harsh Thakor* 
The death of Suresh, a leader associated with New Socialist Praxis (NSP), has been described by colleagues, activists and associates as a significant loss to left and Marxist political circles.
Suresh was known as a public health professional, teacher and activist who combined his medical work with political engagement. Associated with campaigns around public health and student issues, he was active in organising medical students and participated in discussions on socialism, Marxism and social transformation. He was also involved in the formation and organisational work of New Socialist Praxis.
According to those associated with him, Suresh’s political development was influenced by student activism, science movements and left-oriented organisations. Supporters recalled his interest in studying Marxist theory and his efforts to relate political ideas to contemporary social and economic conditions. Colleagues said he remained engaged with labour struggles, inequality and questions surrounding public healthcare and education.
His last rites were held on April 15 in his hometown of Tiruvuru, where family members, students, friends and representatives of several left organisations paid their respects. Students from Nimra Medical College, where he taught Public Health Dentistry, also attended to mourn his passing. Meetings were subsequently organised in Vijayawada and other places to remember his contributions to political activism, public health and education.
At a memorial meeting held on May 3 in Vijayawada, speakers from various left organisations, labour groups, student organisations and cultural platforms reflected on Suresh’s political and professional life. Several speakers described him as a committed activist and educator who sought to combine theoretical study with practical social engagement. Participants also discussed the wider political and economic context in which he worked, including labour unrest, unemployment, inequality and debates within the Indian left movement.
During the meeting, NSP representatives announced the formation of a Suresh Memorial Trust to continue activities associated with his work and ideas. The trust is also expected to oversee the functioning of Shaheed Bhagat Singh libraries in Tadepalli and Visakhapatnam, initiatives in which Suresh had reportedly played an active role. Supporters said the libraries were intended to promote access to free and equitable education.
Speakers at the memorial included representatives from various left organisations, labour unions, writers’ groups, student bodies and public health initiatives. Many recalled Suresh’s role in political discussions, his commitment to public health issues, and his engagement with questions of social change and Marxist theory. Family members, colleagues and former students also shared personal memories of his life and work.
---
*Freelance journalist 

Comments

TRENDING

Swaminarayan, untouchability and the 'we are not Hindu' argument

By Rajiv Shah   Following my blog on why the Eiffel Tower authorities should take all the blame for giving in to the Swaminarayan sadhus ’ bizarre demand to “invisibilise” women, including its female staff, during their visit to the internationally renowned Paris tourist centre on September 5, an interesting comment by one of the top academics drew my attention to something I vaguely knew about one of India’s most powerful and richest religious sects.

From margins to microphones: The rise of Dalit hip-hop in India

By Tersina Maria Toppo*  A protest does not always arrive as a slogan shouted from a street corner. Sometimes, it arrives on a beat. A microphone replaces the megaphone, a music video becomes a public square, and the smartphone becomes the space where a history once pushed to the margins is narrated, debated, and shared.

Xi Jinping’s visit to USA: Recognition that China can't be contained?

By Vijay Prashad   President Xi Jinping’s forthcoming visit to the United States must be understood as more than an encounter between two heads of state, but it must be seen as an encounter between two possible futures. In one future, the United States imposes a spiral of confrontation against China. Trade disputes harden into economic warfare, then economic warfare intensifies into technological blockades, technological blockades produce military encirclement, and finally military encirclement creates incidents, and incidents the danger of becoming an unimaginable war.