Skip to main content

'Funding bias': ₹2,532 cr for Sanskrit vs ₹34 cr for four Dravidian languages

By A Representative
 
The All India Secondary Education Council (AISEC) has sharply criticized the Union Government’s recent directive mandating a strict three-language formula in schools, calling it a veiled attempt to impose Hindi and Sanskrit on non-Hindi speaking populations.
In a statement, AISEC General Secretary Dr. Tarun Kanti Naskar demanded the immediate withdrawal of the CBSE Circular dated May 15, 2026, which makes the study of three languages compulsory for Class IX effective July 1, 2026.
Under the new rules, at least two of the three languages must be native Indian languages. A foreign language can only be studied as a third language if the first two are Indian, or as an optional fourth language.
Dr. Naskar backed his opposition with a sharp critique of the government’s own spending patterns. Citing a 10-year cumulative expenditure analysis (2014-15 to 2024-25), he highlighted stark disparities in funding for scheduled and classical languages:
- Sanskrit: ₹2,532.59 crore
- Urdu: ₹837.94 crore
- Hindi: ₹426.99 crore
- Tamil: ₹113.48 crore
- Kannada, Telugu, Malayalam & Odia (combined): ₹34.08 crore
“It is palpably clear that much emphasis is given to Sanskrit, which is not a spoken language of common people in any part of the country, followed by Urdu and Hindi,” Dr. Naskar said. He argued that the policy effectively forces either Sanskrit or Hindi—or both—onto non-Hindi speaking communities, while similarly condemning Hindi speakers to imposed Sanskrit or other regional languages.
The statement also took aim at the circular’s silence on English, which Dr. Naskar described as “an essential bridge for higher education and a window to acquire worldwide knowledge.” He stressed that English is equally imperative for the robust development of all Modern Indian Languages, enabling symbiotic enrichment rather than displacement.
AISEC has proposed a two-language framework instead: every student should learn their mother tongue and English. Children of inter-state migrants may choose to learn the language of their new state alongside English. A third language, the organization said, should remain strictly voluntary.
“Pedagogically, this two-language framework is the most practical, scientifically sound, and inclusive approach,” Dr. Naskar asserted, demanding that the Union Government immediately revoke the three-language formula by withdrawing the CBSE circular.

Comments

TRENDING

Small Farm, big success: How an innovative couple built a model of sustainable farming

By Bharat Dogra  In Sema, a remote village in Rajasthan's Rajsamand district, Bhagwati Lal and his wife Rekha share equal credit for creating a remarkable farm that has become an inspiration for villagers and visitors alike. Their achievement demonstrates how even a very small piece of land can provide a strong foundation for sustainable livelihoods while enhancing climate resilience and protecting the environment.

Incarceration of Prof Saibaba 'revives' the question: What is crime, who is criminal?

By Kunal Pant* In 2016, a Supreme Court Judge asked the state of Maharashtra, “Do you want to extract a pound of flesh?” The statement was directed against the state for contesting the bail plea of Delhi University Professor GN Saibaba. Saibaba was arrested in 2014, a justification for which was to prevent him from committing what the police called “anti-national activities.”

Shrinking settlements, fading schools: The Tibetan exile crisis in India

By Tseten Lhundup*  Since the 14th Dalai Lama fled to India in 1959, the Tibetan exile community in Dharamsala has established the Central Tibetan Administration (CTA) as the guardian of Tibetan culture and identity. Once admired for its democratic governance , educational system , and religious vitality , the exile community now faces an alarming demographic and institutional decline.