Skip to main content

Rivers and cities: Examining the social costs of waterfront development in Asia

By Alejandra Amor, Mansee Bal Bhargava 
"Rivers, Cities and People" emerges from over two decades of collaborative work between the editors and their sustained engagement with Asian cities. Maartje van Eerd, a senior expert in housing, gender, and social development at IHS, Institute for Housing and Urban Development Studies of Erasmus University, has been conducting research in Chennai since 1998, focusing on governance and livelihood aspects of resettlement. Banashree Banerjee, a senior architect and urban planner with over four decades of experience, has long worked on inclusive approaches in urban planning and management, particularly concerning marginalised communities. Both have collaborated extensively in research and education.
The impetus for the book crystallised after the 2015 Chennai floods, which triggered large-scale resettlement of slum dwellers from riverbanks to peripheral areas. This was recognised as part of a broader pattern across Asian river cities. In 2017, a refresher course for IHS alumni from South Asia on the social aspects of riverfront development led, during the COVID-19 pandemic, to a webinar series in collaboration with INHAF Habitat Forum India. Expanding to include multiple South Asian cities, these discussions among practitioners, researchers, and activists laid the foundation for the book. Published by Routledge India in May 2025, it is available on major online bookselling platforms.
The book was discussed in a Friday Waters Book Reading online session organised by the WforW Foundation, part of the International Association for the Study of the Commons (IASC) Asia Series. The editors, Dr Maartje van Eerd and Banashree Banerjee, were joined by chapter authors Rabia Ezdi, Bhuvaneswari Raman, Tarek Alahwal, and Sunitha Donbosco. 
The discussion highlighted a critical gap in existing literature: the limited attention to social dimensions in riverfront development across Asian cities. At a time when numerous river restoration and waterfront projects are underway, growing evidence indicates that many fail to adequately address complex social challenges. Rivers, as social-ecological systems, require approaches that engage with the interplay between urban development, environmental restoration, and social justice.
Framework, Themes and Case Studies
A defining feature of the book is its focus on social challenges, an area often underexplored in literature dominated by technical, ecological, and recreational perspectives. Issues such as displacement, land and water conflicts, the right to adequate housing, and interconnected concerns of livelihood, health, and food security receive sustained attention. The book is relevant for students, researchers, and practitioners across urban studies, planning, geography, ecology, sociology, and governance.
Organised into two parts with ten chapters, the book examines riverfront development through a “social lens.” The first part, covering cities such as Dhaka, Lahore, Manila, Bangkok, Ahmedabad, and towns in Tamil Nadu, identifies common patterns across diverse contexts, including the pressures of globalisation, climate change impacts, and the privatisation of public space. The second part focuses on Chennai as a “laboratory,” analysing displacement, resettlement, and the political ecology of river restoration.
A recurring theme is the depoliticisation of riverfront development, often framed as a technical exercise despite its implications for land, resources, and rights. Case studies illustrate these dynamics. In Tamil Nadu, unplanned urbanisation transformed river systems into waste sinks, disproportionately affecting smaller industries and women workers. In Chennai, spatial and political analyses show how river boundaries are socially constructed, shaping unequal outcomes in eviction and resettlement.
Studies on forced evictions highlight gaps in rehabilitation processes, while research on communication practices reveals systemic failures in informing affected communities. In several cases, consultation remains limited or tokenistic, contributing to uncertainty and distress during displacement.
Comparative perspectives further underscore shared challenges. The Ravi River project in Lahore demonstrates how land valorisation can disrupt local socio-economic networks. In Manila, relocation efforts involving over 11,000 families reveal shortcomings in housing, infrastructure, and access to livelihoods. Bangkok’s canal revitalisation presents mixed outcomes, with some communities benefiting while others are excluded. Ahmedabad’s Sabarmati Riverfront raises questions about social costs within widely celebrated development models, while Dhaka’s experience highlights class-based disparities in planning and enforcement.
Reflections and Conclusion
Methodologically, the book brings together spatial analysis, political ecology, and participatory approaches, emphasising the need to understand rivers as interconnected systems rather than isolated urban features. It also demonstrates the value of integrating research, education, and practice through collaborative initiatives such as the Chennai research atelier.
A key argument emerging from the book is the need for a decolonised perspective on riverfront development. Many contemporary approaches draw from Western models without sufficient attention to the distinct social, cultural, and ecological contexts of Asian cities. The framing of rivers as habitats—dynamic systems shaped by interactions among people, ecology, and infrastructure—challenges development paradigms that prioritise aesthetics or land value over lived realities.
Across case studies, recurring concerns include the displacement of vulnerable communities, exclusion of local knowledge, unequal treatment based on class, and weak processes of consultation and participation. These patterns point to the need for more inclusive and equitable approaches to riverfront development.
The book’s relevance is underscored by the scale of ongoing projects, particularly in India, where nearly 150 riverfront developments are being pursued, often drawing from the Ahmedabad model. Such initiatives call for closer examination of their social implications, especially for communities whose livelihoods are closely tied to rivers.
Efforts such as the Riverscape Series by the WforW Foundation continue to foster dialogue between research, policy, and practice. These conversations highlight that contemporary water challenges are as much about equity and justice as they are about resources or technology.
Rivers, Cities and People makes a significant contribution by foregrounding the social dimensions of riverfront development. It underscores the importance of ensuring that the restoration of urban rivers does not come at the cost of the rights, livelihoods, and dignity of riverine communities.
---
Alejandra Amor works with the Greater Cambridge City Council as a Policy Strategy and Economy Intern and is also a part-time Senior Research Fellow at the WforW Foundation. Dr Mansee Bal Bhargava is an entrepreneur, researcher, educator, speaker, and mentor; More about her is available at: https://uol.de/en/icbm/geoecology/mitarbeiter, http://www.mansee.in, http://www.edc.org.in, http://www.wforw.in, http://www.woder.org.
Wednesdays.for.Water is an initiative of the WforW Foundation, a think tank built as a citizens’ collective. It seeks to connect water-related concerns and knowledge through dialogue among policymakers, practitioners, researchers, academicians, and youth, promoting water conservation through collective engagement.

Comments

Anonymous said…
You have clearly brought out the complexities of river conservation and regeneration.However a warning not to adopt the western model is oversimplification of the issue which is intertwined with people,politics,social,legal,religious and other aspects.At the same your central point is very critical and crucial.

TRENDING

When democracy becomes a performance: The Tibetan exile experience

By Tseten Lhundup*  I was born in Bylakuppe, one of the largest Tibetan settlements in southern India. From childhood, I grew up in simple barracks, along muddy roads, and in fields with limited resources. Over the years, I have watched our democratic system slowly erode. Observing the recent budget session of the 17th Tibetan Parliament-in-Exile, these “democratic procedures” appear grand and orderly on the surface, yet in reality they amount to little more than empty formalities. The parliamentarians seem largely disconnected from the everyday struggles faced by ordinary exiled Tibetans like us.

Study links sanctions to 500,000 deaths annually leading to rise in global backlash

By Bharat Dogra  International opinion is increasingly turning against the expanding burden of sanctions imposed on a growing number of countries. These measures are contributing to humanitarian crises, intensifying domestic discord, and heightening international tensions, thereby increasing the risks of conflicts and wars. 

Dhurandhar: The Revenge — Blurring the line between fiction and political narrative

By Mohd. Ziyaullah Khan*  "Dhurandhar: The Revenge" does not wait to be remembered; it arrives almost on the heels of its predecessor, released on March 19, 2026, just months after the first film’s December 2025 debut. The speed of its arrival feels less like creative urgency and more like calculated timing—cinema responding not to storytelling rhythm but to the emotional climate of its audience. Director Aditya Dhar, along with actor Yami Gautam, appears acutely aware of this moment and how to harness it.

BJP accounts for 99% of political donations in Gujarat: Corporate giants dominate

By Jag Jivan   An analysis of the official data on donations received by national parties from Gujarat during the Financial Year 2024-25 reveals a staggering concentration of funding, with the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) accounting for nearly the entirety of the contributions. The data, compiled in a document titled "National Parties donations received from Gujarat during FY-2024-25," lists thousands of transactions, painting a detailed picture of the financial backing for political parties from one of India’s most industrially significant states.

Beyond the island: Top mythologist reorients the geography of the Ramayana

By Jag Jivan   In a compelling new analysis that challenges conventional geographical assumptions about the ancient epic, writer and mythologist Devdutt Pattanaik has traced the roots of the Ramayana to the forests and river systems of Central and Eastern India, rather than the peninsular south or the modern island nation of Sri Lanka.

Alarming decline in India's repair culture threatens circular economy goals: Study

By Jag Jivan  A comprehensive new study by environmental research and advocacy organisation Toxics Link has painted a worrying picture of India's fading repair culture, warning that the trend towards replacement over repair is accelerating the country's already critical e-waste crisis.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Captains extraordinaire: Ranking cricket’s most influential skippers

By Harsh Thakor*  Ranking the greatest cricket captains is a subjective exercise, often sparking passionate debate among fans. The following list is not merely a tally of wins and losses; it is an assessment of leadership’s deeper impact. My criteria fuse a captain’s playing record with their tactical skill, placing the highest consideration on their ability to reshape a team’s fortunes and inspire those around them. A captain who inherited a dominant empire is judged differently from one who resurrected a nation’s cricket from the doldrums. With that in mind, here is my perspective on the finest leaders the game has ever seen.

‘No merit’ in Chakraborty’s claims: Personal ethics talk sans details raises questions

By Jag Jivan  A recent opinion piece published in The Quint by Subhash Chandra Garg has raised questions over the circumstances surrounding the resignation of Atanu Chakraborty from HDFC Bank , with Garg stating that the exit “raises doubts about his own ‘ethics’.” Garg, currently Chief Policy Advisor at Subhanjali and former Secretary of the Department of Economic Affairs, Government of India, writes that the Reserve Bank of India ( RBI ) appears to find no substance in Chakraborty’s claims, noting, “It is clear the RBI sees no merit in Atanu Chakraborty’s wild and vague assertions.”