Skip to main content

The business of war: Of profits, power, deepening arms spiral and global insecurity

By Vikas Meshram*  
Today, the reality is that the entire world stands atop a heap of gunpowder created by the proliferation of weapons. An intense global arms race is underway. The United States, which often prides itself on being a champion of democracy, is the world’s largest exporter of arms, followed by Russia. Countries such as France, China, Germany, Italy, the United Kingdom, Spain, South Korea, and Israel are also among the leading arms exporters.
The global arms trade is a massive industry that has existed for centuries. Every year, weapons worth billions of dollars are bought and sold across the world. Statistics indicate that in 2021 alone, the global arms trade was valued at approximately $127 billion. Arms-exporting countries continue to earn enormous revenues annually from this trade.
According to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI), India was the world’s largest arms importer during 2019–2023, marking an increase compared to 2014–2018. Data also shows that among the top ten arms importers, nine countries—including India, Saudi Arabia, and Qatar—are from Asia and the Middle East. Following large-scale arms transfers from over 30 countries during 2022–2023, Ukraine has emerged as the fourth-largest arms importer globally.
It is also noteworthy that European countries nearly doubled their arms imports between 2014–2018 and 2019–2023. During the same period, the United States increased its arms exports by 17%, while Russia’s exports declined by nearly half, placing it behind France. The growing rivalry among major powers such as the United States, Russia, and China continues to drive the expansion of the global arms trade.
Today, the arms industry is expanding rapidly across the world. India, too, is now among the top 25 arms-producing countries. Between 2015 and 2019, India was the second-largest arms importer. In the financial year 2023–24, India produced defence equipment worth ₹1.27 lakh crore, nearly 2.7 times higher than in 2014–15. The central government aims to increase defence exports to ₹50,000 crore by 2029.
However, this relentless arms race has brought the world dangerously close to destruction. In the Russia–Ukraine war, Ukraine has reportedly lost around 18% of its territory over three years. The conflict has led to thousands of deaths, the displacement of millions, and massive destruction. Estimates suggest that the war has caused economic losses worth tens of trillions of rupees.
War pushes nations backward, making recovery extremely difficult. It results not only in economic and human losses but also in severe environmental damage and ecological disruption. Similarly, the conflict in Israel has reportedly caused losses of approximately $67.57 billion, diverting resources from essential sectors such as health and education. In Gaza and the West Bank, investments worth around $50 billion have been destroyed.
Disarmament refers to the reduction, limitation, or elimination of weapons, often in relation to a country’s military capabilities or specific weapon systems. It is fair to argue that disarmament can help curb the arms race and reduce threats to humanity. Only through sustained disarmament efforts can the suffering of civilians be minimized, the risk of nuclear war reduced, and global peace and security strengthened.
The International Day for Disarmament and Non-Proliferation Awareness, observed annually on March 5, serves as a reminder of the persistent dangers posed by weapons of mass destruction. It underscores the urgent need to promote disarmament and prevent the spread of nuclear weapons. This observance is not merely symbolic; it is a call to action for governments, international organisations, and civil society to work collectively towards a world free from the shadow of nuclear conflict.
Since its establishment, the United Nations has placed multilateral disarmament and arms control at the core of its mission to maintain international peace and security. Weapons of mass destruction, particularly nuclear weapons, remain a major concern due to their catastrophic potential.
The excessive accumulation of conventional weapons, along with the illicit trade in small arms and light weapons, continues to threaten global peace, security, and sustainable development. The use of explosive weapons in populated areas poses grave risks to civilians, while emerging technologies such as autonomous weapons systems further complicate global security challenges.
In 1946, shortly after the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki—which killed over 200,000 people—the United Nations General Assembly established a commission to address issues arising from nuclear energy. This marked the beginning of the UN’s long-standing commitment to disarmament, embedded in its charter to protect future generations from the horrors of war.
The threat of nuclear war remains one of the gravest dangers facing humanity. The use of nuclear weapons would result in unimaginable destruction and massive loss of life. A single nuclear explosion in a densely populated area could kill millions instantly and expose many more to radiation-related illnesses. The environmental consequences would be equally catastrophic, including widespread fires, contamination of water sources, and the destruction of ecosystems.
Over the decades, the international community has taken several steps to promote disarmament and non-proliferation through treaties and agreements. The Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (1968) remains a cornerstone of global efforts. The Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (1996) seeks to prohibit all nuclear explosions, while the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (2017) aims at the complete elimination of nuclear arms. Bilateral agreements such as the New START Treaty between the United States and Russia have also attempted to limit deployed strategic nuclear weapons.
Despite these efforts, progress has been slow, and much remains to be done to achieve meaningful disarmament. According to the United Nations, approximately 12,400 nuclear weapons still exist worldwide.
The horrors of chemical warfare were starkly revealed during World War I, when over 124,000 tonnes of chemical agents were used, resulting in nearly 100,000 deaths and millions of injuries.
The United Nations has noted that the cost of a single warship could provide malaria treatment for 26,000 people, highlighting the urgent need to redirect global resources towards human development rather than warfare.
Ultimately, this global observance provides a platform for collective action, encouraging international cooperation on disarmament and non-proliferation. By raising awareness and fostering dialogue, it contributes to building a safer and more peaceful world.
---
*Freelance journalist 

Comments

TRENDING

When democracy becomes a performance: The Tibetan exile experience

By Tseten Lhundup*  I was born in Bylakuppe, one of the largest Tibetan settlements in southern India. From childhood, I grew up in simple barracks, along muddy roads, and in fields with limited resources. Over the years, I have watched our democratic system slowly erode. Observing the recent budget session of the 17th Tibetan Parliament-in-Exile, these “democratic procedures” appear grand and orderly on the surface, yet in reality they amount to little more than empty formalities. The parliamentarians seem largely disconnected from the everyday struggles faced by ordinary exiled Tibetans like us.

Study links sanctions to 500,000 deaths annually leading to rise in global backlash

By Bharat Dogra  International opinion is increasingly turning against the expanding burden of sanctions imposed on a growing number of countries. These measures are contributing to humanitarian crises, intensifying domestic discord, and heightening international tensions, thereby increasing the risks of conflicts and wars. 

Dhurandhar: The Revenge — Blurring the line between fiction and political narrative

By Mohd. Ziyaullah Khan*  "Dhurandhar: The Revenge" does not wait to be remembered; it arrives almost on the heels of its predecessor, released on March 19, 2026, just months after the first film’s December 2025 debut. The speed of its arrival feels less like creative urgency and more like calculated timing—cinema responding not to storytelling rhythm but to the emotional climate of its audience. Director Aditya Dhar, along with actor Yami Gautam, appears acutely aware of this moment and how to harness it.

BJP accounts for 99% of political donations in Gujarat: Corporate giants dominate

By Jag Jivan   An analysis of the official data on donations received by national parties from Gujarat during the Financial Year 2024-25 reveals a staggering concentration of funding, with the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) accounting for nearly the entirety of the contributions. The data, compiled in a document titled "National Parties donations received from Gujarat during FY-2024-25," lists thousands of transactions, painting a detailed picture of the financial backing for political parties from one of India’s most industrially significant states.

Alarming decline in India's repair culture threatens circular economy goals: Study

By Jag Jivan  A comprehensive new study by environmental research and advocacy organisation Toxics Link has painted a worrying picture of India's fading repair culture, warning that the trend towards replacement over repair is accelerating the country's already critical e-waste crisis.

Beyond the island: Top mythologist reorients the geography of the Ramayana

By Jag Jivan   In a compelling new analysis that challenges conventional geographical assumptions about the ancient epic, writer and mythologist Devdutt Pattanaik has traced the roots of the Ramayana to the forests and river systems of Central and Eastern India, rather than the peninsular south or the modern island nation of Sri Lanka.

Captains extraordinaire: Ranking cricket’s most influential skippers

By Harsh Thakor*  Ranking the greatest cricket captains is a subjective exercise, often sparking passionate debate among fans. The following list is not merely a tally of wins and losses; it is an assessment of leadership’s deeper impact. My criteria fuse a captain’s playing record with their tactical skill, placing the highest consideration on their ability to reshape a team’s fortunes and inspire those around them. A captain who inherited a dominant empire is judged differently from one who resurrected a nation’s cricket from the doldrums. With that in mind, here is my perspective on the finest leaders the game has ever seen.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

‘No merit’ in Chakraborty’s claims: Personal ethics talk sans details raises questions

By Jag Jivan  A recent opinion piece published in The Quint by Subhash Chandra Garg has raised questions over the circumstances surrounding the resignation of Atanu Chakraborty from HDFC Bank , with Garg stating that the exit “raises doubts about his own ‘ethics’.” Garg, currently Chief Policy Advisor at Subhanjali and former Secretary of the Department of Economic Affairs, Government of India, writes that the Reserve Bank of India ( RBI ) appears to find no substance in Chakraborty’s claims, noting, “It is clear the RBI sees no merit in Atanu Chakraborty’s wild and vague assertions.”