Skip to main content

Hindu diaspora group joins multifaith lawsuit, challenges the Trump-Vance religious panel

By A Representative 
Diaspora group Hindus For Human Rights (HfHR) has joined a multifaith coalition in filing a federal lawsuit challenging the Trump-Vance administration’s so-called “Religious Liberty Commission,” alleging that the commission was created and administered unlawfully and in violation of federal requirements intended to prevent secretive, unbalanced advisory bodies from shaping public policy.
HfHR filed the legal challenge alongside Interfaith Alliance, Muslims For Progressive Values, and the Sikh American Legal Defense and Education Fund (SALDEF). The coalition is represented by Democracy Forward and Americans United for Separation of Church and State. The case, Interfaith Alliance et al. v. Trump et al., is filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.
The Religious Liberty Commission was established by Executive Order 14291 on May 1, 2025. According to the lawsuit, it has been structured and operated in a manner that elevates a narrow and exclusionary understanding of religious liberty. The commission’s membership reportedly consists exclusively of Christians, with the exception of one Orthodox Jewish rabbi, and does not include representatives from Islam, Hinduism, Buddhism, Sikhism, or nonreligious Americans.
Commission members have repeatedly framed the United States as a “Judeo-Christian” or Christian nation guided by Biblical principles — a viewpoint the coalition argues contradicts the constitutional promise of equal religious freedom and equal civic belonging for all Americans.
The lawsuit challenges the commission’s formation and operation under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), a federal law designed to ensure that advisory committees influencing national policy operate with transparency, serve the public interest, and reflect a fair balance of viewpoints rather than the priorities of a narrow set of special interests.
The legal action asks the court to:
1.Declare that the commission was created and administered in violation of federal law.
2.Require disclosure of records that should already be available to the public.
3.Ensure that any recommendations produced by the commission are clearly identified as coming from an unlawfully constituted body.
“Religious liberty means religious liberty for everyone, not just one faith community. By stacking this Religious Liberty Commission with a narrow set of voices and hiding the commission’s work from the public eye, the Trump administration is evading the transparency and balance that federal law requires. Hindus for Human Rights is proud to stand with our multifaith partners to defend a pluralistic democracy where Hindus, Muslims, Sikhs, Jews, Christians, Buddhists, and nonreligious people all belong as equals", said Ria Chakrabarty, Senior Policy Director, HfHR.
HfHR emphasized that religious freedom cannot be reduced to government endorsement of one tradition’s worldview. For Hindu Americans and other minority faith communities, the consequences of religious favoritism are not abstract: they shape whether communities are treated as fully American, fully protected, and fully equal under the law.

Comments

TRENDING

Neville Cardus: The man who turned cricket writing into poetry

By Harsh Thakor*  Neville Cardus was one of the most remarkable literary figures of the twentieth century. A prolific English writer and critic, he achieved distinction in two vastly different fields: cricket and classical music. Entirely self-taught, Cardus rose from humble beginnings to become both the cricket correspondent and chief music critic of The Manchester Guardian . His achievements in these contrasting disciplines earned him widespread acclaim and established him as one of the foremost critics of his generation. In February 2025, the cricketing and literary world marked the fiftieth anniversary of his death, which occurred in February 1975.

​Ideological shifts and structural realities within India's left-wing insurgency

​By Harsh Thakor*  The Maoist insurgency in India is arguably at its weakest point since the formation of the Communist Party of India (Maoist) in 2004. Years of sustained counterinsurgency operations, leadership losses, shrinking territorial influence, declining recruitment, and growing technological advantages enjoyed by the state have significantly eroded the movement's operational capabilities. 

The Dalit body on screen: Stereotypes, sacrifice, and subjugation in Hindi films

By Dr. Prem Singh*  Despite centuries of reformist efforts, from Gandhi and Ambedkar to contemporary activists, the caste system remains deeply embedded in the Indian psyche. One of the primary reasons for this persistence is the religious sanction provided by Brahminical scriptures, which have shaped not only social structures but also cultural and artistic expressions.