Skip to main content

Dharmendra and the unspoken realities of Bollywood’s political forays

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat* 
Film star Dharmendra lived a remarkably full life. Unapologetically himself, he was known as a man with a generous heart who cherished people and often spoke of love as a guiding principle. His career began in the black-and-white era, where some of his earliest and most memorable performances captured the imagination of audiences across India. He openly idolised Dilip Kumar, whom he regarded as family, and never missed an opportunity to express his admiration for the legendary actor.
Dharmendra’s cinematic journey began with "Dil Bhi Tera Hum Bhi Tere" and went on to include a long list of celebrated films: "Shola Aur Shabnam", "Anpadh", "Ayi Milan Ki Bela", "Haqeeqat", "Purnima", "Kajal", "Mamta", "Devar", "Baharen Phir Ayengi", "Aye Din Bahar Ke", "Mere Humdum Mere Dost"—all of which gifted audiences unforgettable songs and stories. He later delivered critically appreciated performances in films such as "Satyakam", "Anupama", "Chupke Chupke", "Phool Aur Patthar", "Guddi", and many others. He was, in many ways, the quintessential people’s hero, particularly beloved by rural audiences.
Despite his immense popularity, Dharmendra was not always recognised as a “great actor” in the conventional critical sense. Yet his star appeal consistently transcended such labels. Alongside Hema Malini, he formed one of Indian cinema’s most adored on-screen and off-screen partnerships. Still, he wore his fame lightly and lived life on his own terms.
Though never politically inclined, Dharmendra joined the BJP and served as MP from Bikaner. His parliamentary performance was widely criticised, and he rarely participated in proceedings. Unlike some of his children, however, he never gravitated toward ideological extremism. At heart, he remained a romantic who loved Urdu poetry, ghazals, and shayari—an unfiltered man who enjoyed his evening whisky and never pretended otherwise.
Dharmendra leaves behind a vast and cherished legacy. He gave Indian cinema some of its most beloved films, and will be remembered as a star who embraced life fully and connected deeply with people.
As I have often said, we must avoid depending on film stars for political positions. Admire them for their craft—acting, singing, performing. Our celebrities often rely heavily on state patronage; their public stances shift with political winds. It is better for them to focus on their work rather than preach about national greatness. Dharmendra, after dabbling in politics, recognised that it was not for him and returned to what he truly cared about. In an industry filled with façades, he stood apart for his authenticity. Rooted in Punjab, he carried his pride in his heritage throughout his life. And yes, there is another man who left politics yet remains a larger political force than any active politician today—but I need not name him.
Dharmendra entertained generations and gifted us unforgettable cinema. A heartfelt salute to his memory.
---
*Human rights defender 

Comments

TRENDING

Xi Jinping’s visit to USA: Recognition that China can't be contained?

By Vijay Prashad   President Xi Jinping’s forthcoming visit to the United States must be understood as more than an encounter between two heads of state, but it must be seen as an encounter between two possible futures. In one future, the United States imposes a spiral of confrontation against China. Trade disputes harden into economic warfare, then economic warfare intensifies into technological blockades, technological blockades produce military encirclement, and finally military encirclement creates incidents, and incidents the danger of becoming an unimaginable war.

From margins to microphones: The rise of Dalit hip-hop in India

By Tersina Maria Toppo*  A protest does not always arrive as a slogan shouted from a street corner. Sometimes, it arrives on a beat. A microphone replaces the megaphone, a music video becomes a public square, and the smartphone becomes the space where a history once pushed to the margins is narrated, debated, and shared.

Swaminarayan, untouchability and the 'we are not Hindu' argument

By Rajiv Shah   Following my blog on why the Eiffel Tower authorities should take all the blame for giving in to the Swaminarayan sadhus ’ bizarre demand to “invisibilise” women, including its female staff, during their visit to the internationally renowned Paris tourist centre on September 5, an interesting comment by one of the top academics drew my attention to something I vaguely knew about one of India’s most powerful and richest religious sects.