Commission rebukes officers for arbitrary denial of RTI information

By A Representative

The Gujarat Information Commission (GIC) has imposed a penalty of ₹5,000 on the () of in for denying information to an RTI applicant by misinterpreting an earlier order of the Commission.

The Commission has also recommended disciplinary action against the , who acted as the , for negligence of duty.

The case pertains to a petition filed by applicant Pankaj Kamalashankar Rai regarding RTI queries submitted on documents related to house number allotment and construction permits involving . The PIO rejected the request, claiming that the petitioner had submitted more than , allegedly exceeding a permissible limit. The First Appellate Authority upheld the denial on the same grounds.

However, at a hearing held on 14 November 2025, the Commission clarified that its earlier February 2025 order—issued in Appeal Nos. A-2178-2024 and A-2739-2024—restricting specific applicants from filing more than 12 applications was applicable only to those particular applicants and not to the general public.

The Commission observed that officers across the state had begun demanding “confirmation forms” from RTI applicants and rejecting requests on the grounds of exceeding 12 applications, leading to widespread harassment and unnecessary appeals.

While penalising the PIO, the Commission noted that both the PIO and First Appellate Authority denied information without proper examination and by deliberately misinterpreting the order. It called the conduct a failure of duty and recommended action under the .

However, the Commission ultimately rejected the applicant’s requested information since it pertained to third-party records protected under , which covers personal details such as name, address, property transfer and construction permissions. The Commission found no demonstrated larger public interest to justify disclosure.

Social activists hope that the ruling will put an end to incorrect interpretation of the “12 RTI applications” order and provide relief to citizens facing arbitrary rejection of information requests.

Xi Jinping’s visit to USA: Recognition that China can't be contained?

By Vijay Prashad President Xi Jinping’s forthcoming visit to the United States must be understood as more than an encounter between two heads of state, but it must be seen as an encounter between two possible futures. In one future, the United States imposes a spiral of confrontation against China. Trade disputes harden into economic warfare, then economic warfare intensifies into technological blockades, technological blockades produce military encirclement, and finally military encirclement creates incidents, and incidents the danger of becoming an unimaginable war.

Swaminarayan, untouchability and the 'we are not Hindu' argument

By Rajiv Shah Following my blog on why the Eiffel Tower authorities should take all the blame for giving in to the Swaminarayan sadhus ’ bizarre demand to “invisibilise” women, including its female staff, during their visit to the internationally renowned Paris tourist centre on September 5, an interesting comment by one of the top academics drew my attention to something I vaguely knew about one of India’s most powerful and richest religious sects.

From margins to microphones: The rise of Dalit hip-hop in India

By Tersina Maria Toppo* A protest does not always arrive as a slogan shouted from a street corner. Sometimes, it arrives on a beat. A microphone replaces the megaphone, a music video becomes a public square, and the smartphone becomes the space where a history once pushed to the margins is narrated, debated, and shared.

Counterview

Search This Blog