Skip to main content

Adivasi rights group slams Supreme Court ruling on post-facto clearances

By A Representative
 
The Adivasi Adhikar Rashtriya Manch (AARM) has criticised a Supreme Court judgment that permits post-facto environmental clearances for projects begun without prior approval, calling the decision a major setback for environmental safeguards and Adivasi rights.
The ruling reverses the earlier Vanashakti judgment, which had struck down a central government notification allowing such post-facto clearances. AARM described the latest decision as “regressive” and said it effectively rewards violators while undermining the precautionary principle central to environmental regulation. The organisation argued that the judgment aligns with what it called the Centre’s pro-corporate approach to diluting rigorous environmental impact assessments.
AARM noted that the verdict came on a review petition filed by real estate developers, despite the absence of a review plea from the concerned ministry. The group endorsed the dissenting opinion of Justice Ujjal Bhuiyan, who, along with Justice Abhay Oka in the earlier bench, had held that the right to a safe environment is part of the fundamental right to life under Article 21. The dissent warned that treating environmental compliance as an obstruction to development would overturn decades of established jurisprudence.
According to AARM, the judgment poses serious implications for Adivasi communities, especially those in mineral-rich regions. It said the ruling could embolden mining and power companies to begin work without conducting environmental impact assessments or complying with laws that mandate prior consent from Gram Sabhas. The organisation cited a recent case in Chhattisgarh where a mining company felled trees without required permissions, and the court allowed the project to continue on the grounds that the violations were already committed.
AARM has demanded that the decision be reviewed again and that the Vanashakti judgment authored by Justice Abhay Oka be reinstated.
The statement was issued by AARM chairperson Jitendra Chaudhury and national coordinator Pulin Bihari Baske. The release was circulated from the organisation’s New Delhi office.

Comments

TRENDING

Small Farm, big success: How an innovative couple built a model of sustainable farming

By Bharat Dogra  In Sema, a remote village in Rajasthan's Rajsamand district, Bhagwati Lal and his wife Rekha share equal credit for creating a remarkable farm that has become an inspiration for villagers and visitors alike. Their achievement demonstrates how even a very small piece of land can provide a strong foundation for sustainable livelihoods while enhancing climate resilience and protecting the environment.

Incarceration of Prof Saibaba 'revives' the question: What is crime, who is criminal?

By Kunal Pant* In 2016, a Supreme Court Judge asked the state of Maharashtra, “Do you want to extract a pound of flesh?” The statement was directed against the state for contesting the bail plea of Delhi University Professor GN Saibaba. Saibaba was arrested in 2014, a justification for which was to prevent him from committing what the police called “anti-national activities.”

Shrinking settlements, fading schools: The Tibetan exile crisis in India

By Tseten Lhundup*  Since the 14th Dalai Lama fled to India in 1959, the Tibetan exile community in Dharamsala has established the Central Tibetan Administration (CTA) as the guardian of Tibetan culture and identity. Once admired for its democratic governance , educational system , and religious vitality , the exile community now faces an alarming demographic and institutional decline.