Skip to main content

Adivasi rights group slams Supreme Court ruling on post-facto clearances

By A Representative
 
The Adivasi Adhikar Rashtriya Manch (AARM) has criticised a Supreme Court judgment that permits post-facto environmental clearances for projects begun without prior approval, calling the decision a major setback for environmental safeguards and Adivasi rights.
The ruling reverses the earlier Vanashakti judgment, which had struck down a central government notification allowing such post-facto clearances. AARM described the latest decision as “regressive” and said it effectively rewards violators while undermining the precautionary principle central to environmental regulation. The organisation argued that the judgment aligns with what it called the Centre’s pro-corporate approach to diluting rigorous environmental impact assessments.
AARM noted that the verdict came on a review petition filed by real estate developers, despite the absence of a review plea from the concerned ministry. The group endorsed the dissenting opinion of Justice Ujjal Bhuiyan, who, along with Justice Abhay Oka in the earlier bench, had held that the right to a safe environment is part of the fundamental right to life under Article 21. The dissent warned that treating environmental compliance as an obstruction to development would overturn decades of established jurisprudence.
According to AARM, the judgment poses serious implications for Adivasi communities, especially those in mineral-rich regions. It said the ruling could embolden mining and power companies to begin work without conducting environmental impact assessments or complying with laws that mandate prior consent from Gram Sabhas. The organisation cited a recent case in Chhattisgarh where a mining company felled trees without required permissions, and the court allowed the project to continue on the grounds that the violations were already committed.
AARM has demanded that the decision be reviewed again and that the Vanashakti judgment authored by Justice Abhay Oka be reinstated.
The statement was issued by AARM chairperson Jitendra Chaudhury and national coordinator Pulin Bihari Baske. The release was circulated from the organisation’s New Delhi office.

Comments

TRENDING

Xi Jinping’s visit to USA: Recognition that China can't be contained?

By Vijay Prashad   President Xi Jinping’s forthcoming visit to the United States must be understood as more than an encounter between two heads of state, but it must be seen as an encounter between two possible futures. In one future, the United States imposes a spiral of confrontation against China. Trade disputes harden into economic warfare, then economic warfare intensifies into technological blockades, technological blockades produce military encirclement, and finally military encirclement creates incidents, and incidents the danger of becoming an unimaginable war.

Swaminarayan, untouchability and the 'we are not Hindu' argument

By Rajiv Shah   Following my blog on why the Eiffel Tower authorities should take all the blame for giving in to the Swaminarayan sadhus ’ bizarre demand to “invisibilise” women, including its female staff, during their visit to the internationally renowned Paris tourist centre on September 5, an interesting comment by one of the top academics drew my attention to something I vaguely knew about one of India’s most powerful and richest religious sects.

From margins to microphones: The rise of Dalit hip-hop in India

By Tersina Maria Toppo*  A protest does not always arrive as a slogan shouted from a street corner. Sometimes, it arrives on a beat. A microphone replaces the megaphone, a music video becomes a public square, and the smartphone becomes the space where a history once pushed to the margins is narrated, debated, and shared.