A landmark verdict: The Supreme Court puts conservation over commerce in Saranda forest

By Raj Kumar Sinha*

In a powerful demonstration of , the has issued a landmark order protecting the in , a region rightly described as one of the country's most beautiful and dense . This ruling, delivered by a bench of and , is not just a victory for a specific forest; it is a critical step in affirming the legal and moral duty of the State to safeguard our ecological treasures.

The apex court has directed the Jharkhand government to officially notify the Saranda area as a within three months, upholding the spirit of a 1968 notification that had already declared 31,468.25 hectares (approximately 314 sq. km) a "."

The Ban on Mining: A Conservation Imperative

Crucially, the Court has reinforced the nationwide ban on all within , , and within a one-kilometre radius of their boundaries. This absolute prohibition is vital, as mining is unequivocally one of the most destructive human activities in a protected zone.

The Saranda case highlights the devastating conflict between resource extraction and ecology. For years, the region, which is a biodiversity "hotspot" and a critical wildlife corridor connecting the forests of and , has suffered immense environmental and wildlife loss due to rampant mining. It is home to endangered species like the , , , , and .

The State's shifting stance—initially proposing a larger sanctuary, then retreating to a smaller area citing concerns over livelihoods and —drew sharp disapproval from the Court, leading to a direct order for the Chief Secretary's personal appearance. This judicial firmness was necessary to counter the delay and dithering that often plague conservation efforts. The Court rightly pointed out that since the State's own affidavits admitted to no active mining in the originally notified 31,468.25 hectares, there was no valid reason to withhold its declaration as a Wildlife Sanctuary.

Protecting People and the Planet

One of the most significant aspects of the judgment is the Court's explicit direction to the State government to widely publicise that this decision will not adversely affect the individual and community rights of the tribals and forest dwellers under Sections 3 and 4(1) of the .

This is a crucial balance. Conservation efforts must not come at the cost of dispossessing the communities who have been the traditional guardians of the forest. By securing their rights under the FRA, the Court has paved the way for a holistic, community-based conservation model.

The necessity of the ban is underscored by the tragic impact of mining on the region's flagship species: the Asian Elephant. These magnificent animals require vast traditional corridors, which mining leases have repeatedly intersected. The result is increasing , crop destruction, and loss of life—a crisis particularly acute in Saranda. Furthermore, mining has severely impacted water quality in rivers like the , jeopardising the entire ecosystem.

The Court's decision rests on strong constitutional and legal foundations, referencing Articles 48A and 51A(g) which mandate the protection of forests and wildlife, alongside the clear directives of the , the National Forest Policy (1988), and the National Wildlife Action Plan (2017–31). The judgment echoes the concerns of the Justice M.B. Shah Commission (2013), which had warned against and its destruction of elephant habitats in Saranda.

This verdict is a historic milestone in India's environmental jurisprudence. It emphatically clarifies that State governments bear a legal and moral responsibility to formally notify and protect their environmentally sensitive areas. The Saranda decision is a momentous step not only for Jharkhand but for the entire nation, offering a beacon of hope for balancing crucial wildlife conservation with the constitutional rights of our tribal populations.

---

*Bargi Dam Displaced and Affected Association

Neville Cardus: The man who turned cricket writing into poetry

By Harsh Thakor* Neville Cardus was one of the most remarkable literary figures of the twentieth century. A prolific English writer and critic, he achieved distinction in two vastly different fields: cricket and classical music. Entirely self-taught, Cardus rose from humble beginnings to become both the cricket correspondent and chief music critic of The Manchester Guardian . His achievements in these contrasting disciplines earned him widespread acclaim and established him as one of the foremost critics of his generation. In February 2025, the cricketing and literary world marked the fiftieth anniversary of his death, which occurred in February 1975.

Counterview

Search This Blog