Skip to main content

Tariffs, subsidies and double standards: How the US hurts India

By Bharat Dogra 
The tariff policies of the Trump administration have been marked by arbitrariness and unfairness. Nowhere is this more evident than in its treatment of countries such as India and Brazil. The calculations behind the tariffs imposed are devoid of scientific basis or economic logic. In fact, in the case of India and Brazil, the reasoning borders on the bizarre.
India has been singled out for purchasing Russian oil—an unjustified intrusion into the trade sovereignty and economic decision-making of a friendly nation. This move has been further linked, absurdly, to the prolongation of the Ukraine war. Yet, if we look closely at the long history of US involvement in Ukraine—from 2014 to 2025—it is clear that American policies have been among the biggest contributors to the continuation and escalation of the conflict, often at the cost of sacrificing more and more Ukrainian lives in the pursuit of weakening Russia.
The double standards of the US position are exposed by data reported in The Times of India (August 7, 2025). A Finland-based think tank noted: “European Union countries account for 23% of Russia’s revenues from fossil fuel exports against India’s 13% since the beginning of the Ukraine conflict, while G7+ tankers are currently transporting more than half of those barrels.” Clearly, if oil purchases are to be condemned, the US should first look at its own allies.
The distortion in US trade discourse extends beyond energy to food and agriculture. It consistently disregards the vital concerns of Global South nations, which must prioritize food security, sovereignty, and farmers’ livelihoods. Unlike the US, where agriculture sustains only a small share of the population, in India the livelihoods of a majority remain tied to farming and allied activities. For the poor to access food, the government must procure at remunerative prices from farmers and distribute it at affordable rates.
Global agricultural prices are already skewed because rich countries, especially the US and EU, provide massive subsidies to their farmers and agribusinesses. These subsidies allow them to export at artificially low prices, devastating small producers in developing nations. What President Trump demands—breaking open Global South markets and slashing tariffs—is tantamount to asking these countries to jeopardize their food security and rural livelihoods for the sake of US agribusiness interests. To surrender meekly to such demands would be a betrayal of the sacrifices made during national freedom struggles.
Trump portrays the US as the aggrieved party, but in reality it is countries like India that have suffered from the harmful practices of US and Western agribusiness. Companies now facing lawsuits in America for health hazards caused by their technologies are simultaneously pushing to expand aggressively in India.
The unfairness of the global trade system has long been documented. The UNDP’s Human Development Report on international trade highlighted the highly regressive nature of agricultural subsidies in rich nations: “Rich countries spend over $1 billion a year as aid to developing country agriculture and just under $1 billion a day supporting their own agricultural systems.” These subsidies distort markets, destroy livelihoods in the Global South, and disproportionately benefit large agribusinesses in the North.
Examples abound. US cotton farmers once received subsidies equal to the market value of their crop, enabling them to dominate world markets while increasing poverty in African nations like Benin from 37% to 59%. Similarly, American rice grown at $415 per tonne was exported at $274 per tonne, wiping out rice farmers in Ghana and Haiti. In the European Union, sugar was sold at four times the world market price, creating a massive surplus that was dumped—again with subsidies—onto developing country markets, crippling local farmers and small processors.
Oxfam’s study Rigged Rules and Double Standards showed that the US and EU routinely exported farm products at prices over one-third below production costs, devastating farming communities across the Global South. This is the true face of “free trade”—but it is conveniently ignored in Washington’s rhetoric.
The Trump administration seems to believe that by shouting loudly and threatening others, it can turn falsehood into fact. But the reality is starkly different: the global trade system is rigged in favor of the wealthy, and tariff hikes against India are yet another expression of this inequity. India and other developing nations must remain firm in defending their food security, farmers’ livelihoods, and economic sovereignty against these arbitrary demands.
---
Bharat Dogra is Honorary Convener of the Campaign to Save Earth Now. His recent books include A Day in 2071, Planet in Peril, Protecting Earth for Children, and Man Over Machine

Comments

TRENDING

When democracy becomes a performance: The Tibetan exile experience

By Tseten Lhundup*  I was born in Bylakuppe, one of the largest Tibetan settlements in southern India. From childhood, I grew up in simple barracks, along muddy roads, and in fields with limited resources. Over the years, I have watched our democratic system slowly erode. Observing the recent budget session of the 17th Tibetan Parliament-in-Exile, these “democratic procedures” appear grand and orderly on the surface, yet in reality they amount to little more than empty formalities. The parliamentarians seem largely disconnected from the everyday struggles faced by ordinary exiled Tibetans like us.

Study links sanctions to 500,000 deaths annually leading to rise in global backlash

By Bharat Dogra  International opinion is increasingly turning against the expanding burden of sanctions imposed on a growing number of countries. These measures are contributing to humanitarian crises, intensifying domestic discord, and heightening international tensions, thereby increasing the risks of conflicts and wars. 

Dhurandhar: The Revenge — Blurring the line between fiction and political narrative

By Mohd. Ziyaullah Khan*  "Dhurandhar: The Revenge" does not wait to be remembered; it arrives almost on the heels of its predecessor, released on March 19, 2026, just months after the first film’s December 2025 debut. The speed of its arrival feels less like creative urgency and more like calculated timing—cinema responding not to storytelling rhythm but to the emotional climate of its audience. Director Aditya Dhar, along with actor Yami Gautam, appears acutely aware of this moment and how to harness it.

Beyond the island: Top mythologist reorients the geography of the Ramayana

By Jag Jivan   In a compelling new analysis that challenges conventional geographical assumptions about the ancient epic, writer and mythologist Devdutt Pattanaik has traced the roots of the Ramayana to the forests and river systems of Central and Eastern India, rather than the peninsular south or the modern island nation of Sri Lanka.

BJP accounts for 99% of political donations in Gujarat: Corporate giants dominate

By Jag Jivan   An analysis of the official data on donations received by national parties from Gujarat during the Financial Year 2024-25 reveals a staggering concentration of funding, with the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) accounting for nearly the entirety of the contributions. The data, compiled in a document titled "National Parties donations received from Gujarat during FY-2024-25," lists thousands of transactions, painting a detailed picture of the financial backing for political parties from one of India’s most industrially significant states.

Alarming decline in India's repair culture threatens circular economy goals: Study

By Jag Jivan  A comprehensive new study by environmental research and advocacy organisation Toxics Link has painted a worrying picture of India's fading repair culture, warning that the trend towards replacement over repair is accelerating the country's already critical e-waste crisis.

Captains extraordinaire: Ranking cricket’s most influential skippers

By Harsh Thakor*  Ranking the greatest cricket captains is a subjective exercise, often sparking passionate debate among fans. The following list is not merely a tally of wins and losses; it is an assessment of leadership’s deeper impact. My criteria fuse a captain’s playing record with their tactical skill, placing the highest consideration on their ability to reshape a team’s fortunes and inspire those around them. A captain who inherited a dominant empire is judged differently from one who resurrected a nation’s cricket from the doldrums. With that in mind, here is my perspective on the finest leaders the game has ever seen.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

‘No merit’ in Chakraborty’s claims: Personal ethics talk sans details raises questions

By Jag Jivan  A recent opinion piece published in The Quint by Subhash Chandra Garg has raised questions over the circumstances surrounding the resignation of Atanu Chakraborty from HDFC Bank , with Garg stating that the exit “raises doubts about his own ‘ethics’.” Garg, currently Chief Policy Advisor at Subhanjali and former Secretary of the Department of Economic Affairs, Government of India, writes that the Reserve Bank of India ( RBI ) appears to find no substance in Chakraborty’s claims, noting, “It is clear the RBI sees no merit in Atanu Chakraborty’s wild and vague assertions.”