Skip to main content

Why denying statehood to Palestine cannot herald peace in Middle-East

By Dr. Manoj Kumar Mishra* 
Israel’s large-scale military campaign in response to the October 7, 2023, Hamas attacks—widely condemned for their brutality and violation of Israeli sovereignty—has since resulted in significant destruction and displacement in Gaza, accompanied by expanded settlements and increased violence in the West Bank. The long-pursued two-state solution to the Israel-Palestine conflict now appears more elusive than ever.
In the lead-up to a proposed United Nations conference on Palestinian statehood—an initiative led by France and scheduled for June—Israel launched missile strikes on Iran. This escalated into a 12-day military confrontation, which also had the effect of derailing momentum toward international dialogue on Palestinian recognition. While these strikes were presented as targeting Iranian nuclear capabilities, they also served to delay, if not derail, diplomatic attention to the Palestinian cause.
Despite global debates over statehood, the U.S. under the Trump administration showed little support for Palestinian aspirations. The administration sanctioned International Criminal Court (ICC) judges following the issuance of an arrest warrant against Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and the investigation of alleged Israeli human rights violations. President Trump even suggested the evacuation of Gaza’s population without addressing the practicalities of relocation, aligning with his vision of a “Riviera of the Middle East.”
Since the establishment of Israel in 1948, the U.S.—the first country to recognize Israel—has consistently backed its territorial claims and military campaigns, often at the expense of addressing Palestinian sovereignty. Israeli leadership has repeatedly dismissed the possibility of Palestinian statehood in public statements. When momentum has built internationally around recognizing Palestine, the U.S. and some European allies have frequently provided diplomatic support to Israeli efforts to counter it.
Prime Minister Netanyahu, since returning to power, has actively weakened the Oslo Accord framework of a two-state solution by promoting settlement expansion in the West Bank and undermining the Palestinian Authority. These measures have contributed to the erosion of moderate Palestinian political structures while emboldening radical factions. Israel, designated a “major non-NATO ally” of the U.S., benefits from preferential access to American military platforms and technologies. U.S. military aid reached unprecedented levels during Israel’s recent campaigns in Gaza, which according to UN reports, resulted in the deaths of approximately 1,200 Israelis and over 40,000 Palestinians. U.S. support has also been crucial in Israeli operations targeting Hezbollah in Lebanon and engagements with Iranian-backed militias.
Peace in the Middle East Remains Elusive
The current ceasefire in Gaza reflects a tactical pause rather than a comprehensive solution. It has not curtailed Israeli resettlement activities in Gaza and the West Bank, nor has it resolved the broader conflict. Efforts to eliminate Hamas and other militant groups have not addressed the root causes of resistance stemming from occupation and disenfranchisement.
Israel’s push toward a de facto one-state solution—through territorial expansion—seeks to erase the basis for Palestinian claims to sovereignty. Violence by settlers, often supported or ignored by security forces, contributes to an atmosphere of intimidation and displacement. While the 2002 Arab Peace Initiative advocated a two-state resolution to bring stability and peace to the region, Israel has engaged in hostilities not only with Hamas in Gaza but also with Hezbollah in Lebanon, Iran, and its proxies in Syria and Iraq—further undermining that vision.
The peace processes Israel has engaged in with Arab countries have notably excluded Palestinian concerns, raising questions about their long-term viability. Recent developments, including Israel’s Gaza operations, have triggered widespread anger across the Gulf region. The U.S. has been deeply involved in supporting Israel’s military efforts, including direct engagements with groups like the Houthis in Yemen, who disrupted Red Sea trade routes in protest. The challenges faced by the U.S. in responding to these disruptions ultimately led to a ceasefire agreement with the Houthis—negotiated without Israeli involvement.
Even Israel’s possession of nuclear weapons has not deterred missile attacks from Iran and its allied militias. Conventional conflicts in the region are likely to continue unless the core issue of Palestinian statehood is addressed. Without confronting this reality, neither U.S. nor European visions of peace can materialize. Sustainable peace in the Middle East demands acknowledging Palestinian aspirations and engaging with them as part of any long-term solution.
---
*Senior Lecturer, SVM Autonomous College, Jagatsinghpur, Odisha

Comments

TRENDING

When democracy becomes a performance: The Tibetan exile experience

By Tseten Lhundup*  I was born in Bylakuppe, one of the largest Tibetan settlements in southern India. From childhood, I grew up in simple barracks, along muddy roads, and in fields with limited resources. Over the years, I have watched our democratic system slowly erode. Observing the recent budget session of the 17th Tibetan Parliament-in-Exile, these “democratic procedures” appear grand and orderly on the surface, yet in reality they amount to little more than empty formalities. The parliamentarians seem largely disconnected from the everyday struggles faced by ordinary exiled Tibetans like us.

Study links sanctions to 500,000 deaths annually leading to rise in global backlash

By Bharat Dogra  International opinion is increasingly turning against the expanding burden of sanctions imposed on a growing number of countries. These measures are contributing to humanitarian crises, intensifying domestic discord, and heightening international tensions, thereby increasing the risks of conflicts and wars. 

Dhurandhar: The Revenge — Blurring the line between fiction and political narrative

By Mohd. Ziyaullah Khan*  "Dhurandhar: The Revenge" does not wait to be remembered; it arrives almost on the heels of its predecessor, released on March 19, 2026, just months after the first film’s December 2025 debut. The speed of its arrival feels less like creative urgency and more like calculated timing—cinema responding not to storytelling rhythm but to the emotional climate of its audience. Director Aditya Dhar, along with actor Yami Gautam, appears acutely aware of this moment and how to harness it.

Beyond the island: Top mythologist reorients the geography of the Ramayana

By Jag Jivan   In a compelling new analysis that challenges conventional geographical assumptions about the ancient epic, writer and mythologist Devdutt Pattanaik has traced the roots of the Ramayana to the forests and river systems of Central and Eastern India, rather than the peninsular south or the modern island nation of Sri Lanka.

BJP accounts for 99% of political donations in Gujarat: Corporate giants dominate

By Jag Jivan   An analysis of the official data on donations received by national parties from Gujarat during the Financial Year 2024-25 reveals a staggering concentration of funding, with the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) accounting for nearly the entirety of the contributions. The data, compiled in a document titled "National Parties donations received from Gujarat during FY-2024-25," lists thousands of transactions, painting a detailed picture of the financial backing for political parties from one of India’s most industrially significant states.

Alarming decline in India's repair culture threatens circular economy goals: Study

By Jag Jivan  A comprehensive new study by environmental research and advocacy organisation Toxics Link has painted a worrying picture of India's fading repair culture, warning that the trend towards replacement over repair is accelerating the country's already critical e-waste crisis.

Captains extraordinaire: Ranking cricket’s most influential skippers

By Harsh Thakor*  Ranking the greatest cricket captains is a subjective exercise, often sparking passionate debate among fans. The following list is not merely a tally of wins and losses; it is an assessment of leadership’s deeper impact. My criteria fuse a captain’s playing record with their tactical skill, placing the highest consideration on their ability to reshape a team’s fortunes and inspire those around them. A captain who inherited a dominant empire is judged differently from one who resurrected a nation’s cricket from the doldrums. With that in mind, here is my perspective on the finest leaders the game has ever seen.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

‘No merit’ in Chakraborty’s claims: Personal ethics talk sans details raises questions

By Jag Jivan  A recent opinion piece published in The Quint by Subhash Chandra Garg has raised questions over the circumstances surrounding the resignation of Atanu Chakraborty from HDFC Bank , with Garg stating that the exit “raises doubts about his own ‘ethics’.” Garg, currently Chief Policy Advisor at Subhanjali and former Secretary of the Department of Economic Affairs, Government of India, writes that the Reserve Bank of India ( RBI ) appears to find no substance in Chakraborty’s claims, noting, “It is clear the RBI sees no merit in Atanu Chakraborty’s wild and vague assertions.”