Skip to main content

Remembering Sumit: A gentle, radical journalist, who tried to continue his father's legacy

By Rajiv Shah 
This is about Sumit Chakravartty, who passed away in Kolkata last Saturday. One of the most unassuming colleagues during my Patriot-Link days in Delhi, which lasted from 1979 to 1993, Sumit, as we would address him, was perhaps the most polite and soft-spoken among all others.
Upon his return from Moscow, where he served as Patriot-Link's foreign correspondent around the time I joined Link as a sub-editor on January 1, 1979—my first day as a journalist—Sumit took on the role of special correspondent, covering foreign affairs and the Left parties.
I remember Sumit as a deeply ideologically driven person, emotionally discussing workers' struggles on one hand and condemning "American imperialism" on the other, while unwaveringly defending the Soviet Union. So emotionally charged was he that, I recall, during a protest by Patriot-Link workers against the paper's transition to computers in the early 1980s—perhaps the first to do it in Delhi—Sumit was one of the few journalists who joined workers in shouting slogans against management. It's worth noting that a compromise was eventually reached, allowing linotype workers to be retrained for computers and move to a spacious, air-conditioned room.
After Sumit returned from Moscow, Vinod Taksal took his place, and after Vinod’s tenure ended, I was sent to Moscow. Before my departure in early 1986, Sumit (if I remember correctly, he had already left Patriot-Link to join The Daily by then) gave me valuable advice about Moscow. He invited me to his home and, as I was about to leave, handed me a sky-blue windcheater, saying it would be useful for the mild Moscow winter. "I don't have any use for it," he said, wishing me the best of luck with my new assignment.
A die-hard pro-Soviet and often quite vocal in criticizing the Left, too, Sumit knew most Communist leaders personally. Strongly critical of the BJP, his political reports were filled with emotionally charged terms like "imperialism," "fascism," "Left adventurism," and so on. However, in personal conversations, he was extremely polite and unusually eager to befriend everyone he met.
I had no interaction with him between 1986 and 1993, while I was working as a foreign correspondent in Moscow. On my return to India in April 1993, I was looking for opportunities, as Patriot-Link was financially struggling after veteran freedom fighter Aruna Asaf Ali, who controlled the papers, turned down an offer from the Ambanis to take over. As part of my search, I met Sumit.
By then, Sumit seemed to have taken over Mainstream weekly, a Left-of-center periodical that had been running for decades under the leadership of his father, Nikhil Chakravartty (1913–1998). After Nikhil's passing, the responsibility of running the weekly appeared to fall on Sumit.
In 1993, I met Sumit at the Mainstream office in Gole Market, Delhi. I asked if he could connect me with someone in Delhi’s media who could offer me a reasonable opportunity. He politely replied, "Sure! They need someone who understands foreign affairs, which you do, given your Moscow experience. I'll get back to you..."
Soon after, I met Dilip Padgaonkar, the editor-in-chief of The Times of India. Dilip had approached me in Moscow, but since I was already working full-time with Patriot-Link and the Times wanted a stringer, nothing worked out. "If not Moscow, why not Ahmedabad?" he asked me, and I agreed. I then moved to Ahmedabad, and, to my regret, I never reached out to Sumit again.
Searching for information about Sumit online was difficult. I found only two media obituaries—one by veteran journalist Anand Sahay in The Wire and another by VK Cherian in a Facebook post. Anand’s obituary offers a personal, impressionistic account of Sumit, while Cherian’s suggests that Sumit’s professional career was overshadowed by his father.
To quote Cherian, Sumit took over Mainstream after his father’s death in 1998 and transitioned it into a digital journal "as old funders, mostly his father's friends, dried up." Cherian went on to explain that under Nikhil’s leadership, Mainstream had been like the Seminar magazine of Romesh Thapar—intellectual, cerebral, and in-depth. Nikhil was a person who "used to have breakfast" with Indira Gandhi and PV Narasimha Rao when they were Prime Ministers. 
Cherian also mentioned that Nikhil had close ties with the Soviet establishment and was instrumental in sending CPI leaders on a submarine to meet Stalin in the 1950s. Sumit, too, had witnessed that secret entry as a boy. Cherian noted that while Nikhil had no shortage of funding, Sumit had the significant burden of maintaining his father’s legacy and securing funding, which is why the weekly transitioned to a digital edition.
Sumit’s mother, Renu Chakravartty (1917–1994), was also a prominent figure in the Left movement. A women’s leader and a member of Parliament from the Communist Party of India in the 1950s and 1960s, she played a crucial role in the movement.
So who will edit Mainstream now? It was a one-person army under Sumit. I don't know  about the future of a journal originally founded by Nikhil Chakravartty, a doyen of Indian journalism. I tried searching the site to find out if a detailed obituary of Sumit exists on it, but to no avail. 

Comments

TRENDING

When democracy becomes a performance: The Tibetan exile experience

By Tseten Lhundup*  I was born in Bylakuppe, one of the largest Tibetan settlements in southern India. From childhood, I grew up in simple barracks, along muddy roads, and in fields with limited resources. Over the years, I have watched our democratic system slowly erode. Observing the recent budget session of the 17th Tibetan Parliament-in-Exile, these “democratic procedures” appear grand and orderly on the surface, yet in reality they amount to little more than empty formalities. The parliamentarians seem largely disconnected from the everyday struggles faced by ordinary exiled Tibetans like us.

Study links sanctions to 500,000 deaths annually leading to rise in global backlash

By Bharat Dogra  International opinion is increasingly turning against the expanding burden of sanctions imposed on a growing number of countries. These measures are contributing to humanitarian crises, intensifying domestic discord, and heightening international tensions, thereby increasing the risks of conflicts and wars. 

Dhurandhar: The Revenge — Blurring the line between fiction and political narrative

By Mohd. Ziyaullah Khan*  "Dhurandhar: The Revenge" does not wait to be remembered; it arrives almost on the heels of its predecessor, released on March 19, 2026, just months after the first film’s December 2025 debut. The speed of its arrival feels less like creative urgency and more like calculated timing—cinema responding not to storytelling rhythm but to the emotional climate of its audience. Director Aditya Dhar, along with actor Yami Gautam, appears acutely aware of this moment and how to harness it.

BJP accounts for 99% of political donations in Gujarat: Corporate giants dominate

By Jag Jivan   An analysis of the official data on donations received by national parties from Gujarat during the Financial Year 2024-25 reveals a staggering concentration of funding, with the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) accounting for nearly the entirety of the contributions. The data, compiled in a document titled "National Parties donations received from Gujarat during FY-2024-25," lists thousands of transactions, painting a detailed picture of the financial backing for political parties from one of India’s most industrially significant states.

Alarming decline in India's repair culture threatens circular economy goals: Study

By Jag Jivan  A comprehensive new study by environmental research and advocacy organisation Toxics Link has painted a worrying picture of India's fading repair culture, warning that the trend towards replacement over repair is accelerating the country's already critical e-waste crisis.

Beyond the island: Top mythologist reorients the geography of the Ramayana

By Jag Jivan   In a compelling new analysis that challenges conventional geographical assumptions about the ancient epic, writer and mythologist Devdutt Pattanaik has traced the roots of the Ramayana to the forests and river systems of Central and Eastern India, rather than the peninsular south or the modern island nation of Sri Lanka.

Captains extraordinaire: Ranking cricket’s most influential skippers

By Harsh Thakor*  Ranking the greatest cricket captains is a subjective exercise, often sparking passionate debate among fans. The following list is not merely a tally of wins and losses; it is an assessment of leadership’s deeper impact. My criteria fuse a captain’s playing record with their tactical skill, placing the highest consideration on their ability to reshape a team’s fortunes and inspire those around them. A captain who inherited a dominant empire is judged differently from one who resurrected a nation’s cricket from the doldrums. With that in mind, here is my perspective on the finest leaders the game has ever seen.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

‘No merit’ in Chakraborty’s claims: Personal ethics talk sans details raises questions

By Jag Jivan  A recent opinion piece published in The Quint by Subhash Chandra Garg has raised questions over the circumstances surrounding the resignation of Atanu Chakraborty from HDFC Bank , with Garg stating that the exit “raises doubts about his own ‘ethics’.” Garg, currently Chief Policy Advisor at Subhanjali and former Secretary of the Department of Economic Affairs, Government of India, writes that the Reserve Bank of India ( RBI ) appears to find no substance in Chakraborty’s claims, noting, “It is clear the RBI sees no merit in Atanu Chakraborty’s wild and vague assertions.”