Skip to main content

Overriding India's constitutional sovereignty? Citizens urge PM to reject WHO IHR amendments

By A Representative 
A group of concerned Indian citizens, including medical professionals and activists, has sent an urgent appeal to Prime Minister Narendra Modi, urging him to reject proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHR) before the ratification deadline of July 19, 2025. 
The signatories express deep concern that the amendments would grant the World Health Organization (WHO) "unduly increased authority over national health decisions" and could potentially override India's constitutional sovereignty. They highlight that these amendments are being pursued in parallel with the World Pandemic Treaty, with both documents reinforcing each other to strengthen clauses that would give the WHO the power to direct sovereign national governments.
The letter, dated July 14, 2025, emphasizes that India has a strong legacy of managing public health challenges and should not surrender its sovereign health decisions to an unelected external body without full safeguards and democratic accountability. 
Key concerns raised include the erosion of sovereignty by binding India to WHO-declared health emergencies without parliamentary or state involvement, the absence of public and parliamentary debate on such far-reaching changes, and the potential threat to constitutional rights, as public health falls under the State List. 
The signatories also point out that a uniform, top-down health mechanism may not suit India's diverse socio-economic realities and could disproportionately burden vulnerable communities. They are requesting the Prime Minister to publicly state India's rejection of the amendments, organize a comprehensive parliamentary debate and vote, and ensure India does not endorse the amendments by the deadline unless changes are made that respect India's Constitution and sovereignty. Some signatories also suggest that India should be willing to exit the WHO.
An attached document outlines ten reasons for rejection, including concerns over the new definition of "relevant health products" which excludes natural solutions, the WHO Director-General's unchecked power to declare a "pandemic emergency," the financial implications for member states, and the improper addition of Article 44bis concerning a "Coordinating Financial Mechanism". 
Other reasons include the Director-General's failure to properly submit the final version of the amendments with adequate notice, the unacceptable prospect of quarantining healthy people, the forced application of "health measures" on conveyance operators, the obligation for nations to enact domestic legislation to implement the amendments, the WHO's "money-making racket" concerning access to health products, and the violation of human rights by authorizing nations to compel travelers to undergo vaccination or other prophylaxis. 
The letter is copied to the Union Minister for Health and Family Welfare and all Members of Parliament.

Comments

TRENDING

Xi Jinping’s visit to USA: Recognition that China can't be contained?

By Vijay Prashad   President Xi Jinping’s forthcoming visit to the United States must be understood as more than an encounter between two heads of state, but it must be seen as an encounter between two possible futures. In one future, the United States imposes a spiral of confrontation against China. Trade disputes harden into economic warfare, then economic warfare intensifies into technological blockades, technological blockades produce military encirclement, and finally military encirclement creates incidents, and incidents the danger of becoming an unimaginable war.

Swaminarayan, untouchability and the 'we are not Hindu' argument

By Rajiv Shah   Following my blog on why the Eiffel Tower authorities should take all the blame for giving in to the Swaminarayan sadhus ’ bizarre demand to “invisibilise” women, including its female staff, during their visit to the internationally renowned Paris tourist centre on September 5, an interesting comment by one of the top academics drew my attention to something I vaguely knew about one of India’s most powerful and richest religious sects.

From margins to microphones: The rise of Dalit hip-hop in India

By Tersina Maria Toppo*  A protest does not always arrive as a slogan shouted from a street corner. Sometimes, it arrives on a beat. A microphone replaces the megaphone, a music video becomes a public square, and the smartphone becomes the space where a history once pushed to the margins is narrated, debated, and shared.