Skip to main content

Domestic political considerations? War between Cambodia and Thailand around an ancient temple

By Kay Young 

The long-simmering border dispute between Cambodia and Thailand has escalated into open violence, with both sides exchanging artillery and air fire near the ancient Preah Vihear temple complex. At the time of writing, reports of what is happening on the ground are still unclear. In Surin province a petrol station and 7-11 were hit, supposedly by a missile, killing two civilians; a Thai F-16 fighter jet has also reportedly been downed. This latest flare-up seems to be the most serious military clash between the neighbouring nations since the Cold War, reviving historical tensions that date back to colonial-era border disputes.
The conflict's origins trace to 1962 when the International Court of Justice awarded sovereignty of the 11th century Khmer temple to Cambodia, though the surrounding territory remained contested. Periodic flare-ups occurred over subsequent decades, most notably in 2008 when Cambodia’s successful UNESCO World Heritage listing for the temple sparked nationalist protests in Thailand. The situation turned deadly in 2011 when sustained fighting killed dozens and displaced thousands before international intervention temporarily calmed tensions.
Recent months saw renewed friction as Cambodia expanded infrastructure near the border while Thailand increased military patrols in the area. In late May, a Cambodian soldier was killed by Royal Thai Army soldiers, sparking huge nationalist protests across Cambodia.
The immediate trigger for this week's violence remains unclear, with each side claiming that the other fired first. Domestic political considerations in both nations seem to be playing a significant role, particularly in Thailand where the Royal Thai Military establishment has historically operated with almost complete autonomy from civilian leadership.
A leaked phone conversation between Cambodian de facto leader Hun Sen (father of current Prime Minister Hun Manet) and then Thai Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra last month revealed attempts at private diplomacy amid the public crisis. Paetongtarn sought to calm tensions, urging restraint, while Hun Sen expressed frustration over Thai military movements near the border.
In the call Paetongtarn expresses her dismay at her lack of control over the Royal Thai Military at the border. She said, regarding a Royal Thai Military General, “He is on the opposite side (to her)”. This was a clear reference to an open secret in the region: that the Royal Thai Army—responsible for more coups than any other military in modern history—does not answer to a civilian parliament.
The leaking of the phone call led to Paetongtarns dismissal as Prime Minister by the Constitutional Court a few weeks later, severely weakening the Phue Thai party’s already fragile coalition. The pro-peasant Phue Thai party has repeatedly been ousted from government via military coup d'état in the past two decades. As such, the recent tension on the border, and outbreak of all out war, cannot be viewed in isolation as a simple State-on-State or Thailand vs Cambodia battle.
Hun Sen had ruled Cambodia for 38 years (1985–2023) before transferring power to his son, Hun Manet, in August 2023. In an oddly similar circumstance, Paetongtarn Shinawatra is the daughter of former Thai Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra. Both fathers are considered the real powers behind the office and historically enjoyed close family ties; it was revealed by Wikileaks that Thaksin even backed Hun Sen on Cambodia’s claim to the Preah Vihear Temple around 2009. Indeed, in the leaked phone call between Paetongtarn and Hun Sen, she refers to him as "uncle".
However, since the leaked call—which, by all accounts, came intentionally from Hun Sen’s side—the relationship has rapidly deteriorated. Since Pheu Thai retook office in 2023 after nearly a decade of military rule, it has faced immense pressure from both ultra-nationalist military loyalists and the newly formed liberal People’s Party. Many in the military would like nothing more than to see Pheu Thai and the Shinawatra family completely expelled from Thai politics due to their pro-peasant populist policies. The recent military escalation on the border—almost confirmed by Paetongtarn as politically motivated—appears to be an attempt to destabilise Pheu Thai’s fragile coalition majority in parliament.
Similarly, it seems Hun Sen has switched sides, so to speak, abandoning any loyalty to the Shinawatras. In return, nationalist sentiment in Cambodia can be used to assuage mounting issues like currency depreciation, wage stagnation, and growing youth unemployment—while also helping legitimise the leadership transition to his son, Hun Manet.
The current clashes present concerns because of changed military capabilities on both sides. Cambodia has recently acquired new drones and artillery systems, while Thailand has invested in advanced fighter jets and missile technology – notably Saab fighter jets from Sweden. This arms build-up increases the risk that any confrontation could rapidly escalate. Several thousand civilians have reportedly already fled villages near the fighting, with border crossings closed and trade cancelled.
ASEAN has called for restraint but faces challenges mediating between member states with competing territorial claims. The regional body's consensus-based approach makes decisive intervention unlikely unless fighting spreads to other disputed areas along the border.
Historical patterns suggest that the current fighting could follow one of two paths: either a rapid de-escalation as both sides pull back from further confrontation, or a prolonged stalemate that draws in international mediators. With nationalist sentiment running high in both capitals and military establishments wary of appearing weak, the coming days will prove crucial.
At its core, the conflict over Preah Vihear dispute represents more than just a border quarrel - it encapsulates the enduring challenges of post-colonial boundaries, the difficulty of reconciling historical claims with modern realities and the sometimes invisible domestic power struggles that take place in the capitals.
The conflict has already devastated rural communities on both sides. During the 2011 clashes over Preah Vihear temple, over 30,000 Cambodian villagers were forced to flee, many losing crops and livestock that sustained their families. On the Thai side, provinces like Surin saw cross-border trade—normally worth billions annually—plummet by 60% during tensions, starving markets that thousands depend on.
Landmines remain a grim legacy, with uncleared fields, and reportedly new mines, still claiming limbs and lives. Both countries have militarised border zones, forcing rural families into instability, with children’s education and healthcare access often compromised. The politicisation of the dispute has further marginalised these communities, as nationalist rhetoric drowns out their own day-to-day economic and humanitarian struggles. As artillery shells once again fall around the ancient temple, the human and political costs of this conflict continue to mount.
---
This article was produced by Globetrotter. Kay Young is a writer and editor at DinDeng journal (Thailand). He has a forthcoming book on Thai revolutionary history with LeftWord Books (India)

Comments

TRENDING

When democracy becomes a performance: The Tibetan exile experience

By Tseten Lhundup*  I was born in Bylakuppe, one of the largest Tibetan settlements in southern India. From childhood, I grew up in simple barracks, along muddy roads, and in fields with limited resources. Over the years, I have watched our democratic system slowly erode. Observing the recent budget session of the 17th Tibetan Parliament-in-Exile, these “democratic procedures” appear grand and orderly on the surface, yet in reality they amount to little more than empty formalities. The parliamentarians seem largely disconnected from the everyday struggles faced by ordinary exiled Tibetans like us.

Study links sanctions to 500,000 deaths annually leading to rise in global backlash

By Bharat Dogra  International opinion is increasingly turning against the expanding burden of sanctions imposed on a growing number of countries. These measures are contributing to humanitarian crises, intensifying domestic discord, and heightening international tensions, thereby increasing the risks of conflicts and wars. 

Dhurandhar: The Revenge — Blurring the line between fiction and political narrative

By Mohd. Ziyaullah Khan*  "Dhurandhar: The Revenge" does not wait to be remembered; it arrives almost on the heels of its predecessor, released on March 19, 2026, just months after the first film’s December 2025 debut. The speed of its arrival feels less like creative urgency and more like calculated timing—cinema responding not to storytelling rhythm but to the emotional climate of its audience. Director Aditya Dhar, along with actor Yami Gautam, appears acutely aware of this moment and how to harness it.

Beyond the island: Top mythologist reorients the geography of the Ramayana

By Jag Jivan   In a compelling new analysis that challenges conventional geographical assumptions about the ancient epic, writer and mythologist Devdutt Pattanaik has traced the roots of the Ramayana to the forests and river systems of Central and Eastern India, rather than the peninsular south or the modern island nation of Sri Lanka.

BJP accounts for 99% of political donations in Gujarat: Corporate giants dominate

By Jag Jivan   An analysis of the official data on donations received by national parties from Gujarat during the Financial Year 2024-25 reveals a staggering concentration of funding, with the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) accounting for nearly the entirety of the contributions. The data, compiled in a document titled "National Parties donations received from Gujarat during FY-2024-25," lists thousands of transactions, painting a detailed picture of the financial backing for political parties from one of India’s most industrially significant states.

Alarming decline in India's repair culture threatens circular economy goals: Study

By Jag Jivan  A comprehensive new study by environmental research and advocacy organisation Toxics Link has painted a worrying picture of India's fading repair culture, warning that the trend towards replacement over repair is accelerating the country's already critical e-waste crisis.

Captains extraordinaire: Ranking cricket’s most influential skippers

By Harsh Thakor*  Ranking the greatest cricket captains is a subjective exercise, often sparking passionate debate among fans. The following list is not merely a tally of wins and losses; it is an assessment of leadership’s deeper impact. My criteria fuse a captain’s playing record with their tactical skill, placing the highest consideration on their ability to reshape a team’s fortunes and inspire those around them. A captain who inherited a dominant empire is judged differently from one who resurrected a nation’s cricket from the doldrums. With that in mind, here is my perspective on the finest leaders the game has ever seen.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

‘No merit’ in Chakraborty’s claims: Personal ethics talk sans details raises questions

By Jag Jivan  A recent opinion piece published in The Quint by Subhash Chandra Garg has raised questions over the circumstances surrounding the resignation of Atanu Chakraborty from HDFC Bank , with Garg stating that the exit “raises doubts about his own ‘ethics’.” Garg, currently Chief Policy Advisor at Subhanjali and former Secretary of the Department of Economic Affairs, Government of India, writes that the Reserve Bank of India ( RBI ) appears to find no substance in Chakraborty’s claims, noting, “It is clear the RBI sees no merit in Atanu Chakraborty’s wild and vague assertions.”