Skip to main content

India’s reluctance to ratify UN torture convention undermines democratic commitments, says MASUM

By A Representative
 
On the 38th anniversary of the UN Convention Against Torture (UN CAT), Banglar Manabadhikar Suraksha Mancha (MASUM) issued a powerful statement condemning the continued use of torture in India and the state's failure to ratify the treaty. The organization observed the International Day in Support of Victims of Torture by standing in solidarity with survivors and demanding systemic reforms to end impunity and state-sponsored violence.
Despite having signed the Convention in 1997, India has yet to ratify it, and according to MASUM, this delay perpetuates a "facade of commitment" while torture is increasingly normalized. The group cites increasing reports of arbitrary arrests under laws like the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act (UAPA), the construction of informal detention centers, and illegal pushbacks of Indian citizens across borders.
Kirity Roy, Secretary of MASUM and National Convenor of PACTI (Programme Against Custodial Torture & Impunity), asserted,  
"Without the abolition of torture, over half the citizenry—comprising, but not limited to, women and religious and caste minorities—risk being subjected to abuse with impunity in India."
Roy also criticized the failure of key institutions such as the National Human Rights Commission and over 175 Human Rights Institutions (HRIs), calling them "unresponsive and dysfunctional." He noted India’s non-implementation of the Istanbul Protocol, which lays out international standards for investigating and documenting torture.
MASUM outlined its core demands:
- Immediate ratification of the UN CAT and enactment of domestic anti-torture legislation.  
- Implementation of the Istanbul Protocol across all custodial institutions.  
- Release of arbitrarily detained individuals.  
- Restructuring of national and state human rights bodies for true accountability.  
- Establishment of Human Rights Courts in each Subdivision/Taluk as per the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993.
Roy concluded by reaffirming MASUM’s position:  
"We call for an end to torture and all forms of state violence, and for accountability at every step to uphold peace in the literal sense."

Comments

TRENDING

Xi Jinping’s visit to USA: Recognition that China can't be contained?

By Vijay Prashad   President Xi Jinping’s forthcoming visit to the United States must be understood as more than an encounter between two heads of state, but it must be seen as an encounter between two possible futures. In one future, the United States imposes a spiral of confrontation against China. Trade disputes harden into economic warfare, then economic warfare intensifies into technological blockades, technological blockades produce military encirclement, and finally military encirclement creates incidents, and incidents the danger of becoming an unimaginable war.

Swaminarayan, untouchability and the 'we are not Hindu' argument

By Rajiv Shah   Following my blog on why the Eiffel Tower authorities should take all the blame for giving in to the Swaminarayan sadhus ’ bizarre demand to “invisibilise” women, including its female staff, during their visit to the internationally renowned Paris tourist centre on September 5, an interesting comment by one of the top academics drew my attention to something I vaguely knew about one of India’s most powerful and richest religious sects.

From margins to microphones: The rise of Dalit hip-hop in India

By Tersina Maria Toppo*  A protest does not always arrive as a slogan shouted from a street corner. Sometimes, it arrives on a beat. A microphone replaces the megaphone, a music video becomes a public square, and the smartphone becomes the space where a history once pushed to the margins is narrated, debated, and shared.