Complaint filed against Amul for alleged violation of IMS Act in infant formula promotion

By A Representative

The Breastfeeding Promotion Network of India (BPNI) has filed a formal complaint against dairy giant Amul, alleging violations of the Infant Milk Substitutes, Feeding Bottles, and Infant Foods (Regulation of Production, Supply and Distribution) Act, 1992 (IMS Act). The complaint has been addressed to the Ministry of Women and Child Development, the National Commission for Protection of Child Rights (NCPCR), the Food Safety Standards Authority of India (FSSAI), and the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare.

Dr. Arun Gupta, Chief Coordinator of BPNI, has raised concerns regarding Amul’s recent launch of its liquid ready-to-feed infant formula, branded as Amulspray. BPNI argues that this constitutes a direct violation of the IMS Act, which prohibits the promotion of infant milk substitutes. The organization cites Section 2(g) and Section 2(i) of the Act, which define infant milk substitutes and restrict promotional activities. Reports from media outlets such as The Tribune and Agrimoon.com indicate that Amul’s press release emphasized the product’s convenience for working mothers and its nutritional benefits, which BPNI claims amounts to unlawful marketing.

Further concerns have been raised regarding Amul’s use of a teddy bear graphic on the product packaging. BPNI asserts that this violates Section 6(2) of the IMS Act, which prohibits the use of imagery designed to enhance product saleability. In response, the organization has urged authorities to take action, including directing Amul to cease all promotional activities related to infant milk substitutes, removing the teddy bear graphic from the product label, establishing a monitoring mechanism to ensure compliance with the IMS Act, and issuing advisories to media outlets to vet press releases for legal compliance before publication.

BPNI, which has been actively monitoring compliance with the IMS Act since its notification by the Government of India in 1994, claims to remain committed to safeguarding infant feeding practices from commercial influence. As the complaint gains attention, stakeholders await the response from government agencies regarding potential regulatory action against Amul.

Xi Jinping’s visit to USA: Recognition that China can't be contained?

By Vijay Prashad President Xi Jinping’s forthcoming visit to the United States must be understood as more than an encounter between two heads of state, but it must be seen as an encounter between two possible futures. In one future, the United States imposes a spiral of confrontation against China. Trade disputes harden into economic warfare, then economic warfare intensifies into technological blockades, technological blockades produce military encirclement, and finally military encirclement creates incidents, and incidents the danger of becoming an unimaginable war.

Swaminarayan, untouchability and the 'we are not Hindu' argument

By Rajiv Shah Following my blog on why the Eiffel Tower authorities should take all the blame for giving in to the Swaminarayan sadhus ’ bizarre demand to “invisibilise” women, including its female staff, during their visit to the internationally renowned Paris tourist centre on September 5, an interesting comment by one of the top academics drew my attention to something I vaguely knew about one of India’s most powerful and richest religious sects.

From margins to microphones: The rise of Dalit hip-hop in India

By Tersina Maria Toppo* A protest does not always arrive as a slogan shouted from a street corner. Sometimes, it arrives on a beat. A microphone replaces the megaphone, a music video becomes a public square, and the smartphone becomes the space where a history once pushed to the margins is narrated, debated, and shared.

Counterview

Search This Blog