Skip to main content

AISEC calls for rollback of privatization, communalization in Indian education system

By A Representative 
On the birth anniversary of social reformer Raja Rammohan Roy, the All India Save Education Committee (AISEC) unveiled the Draft People’s Education Policy 2025 (PEP 2025), presenting it as a comprehensive and democratic alternative to the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020. Framed after extensive consultations with educators, students, parents, and civil society groups, the draft aims to revive the vision of India’s freedom fighters for an education system that is truly universal, secular, scientific, democratic, and inclusive.
The release of the draft policy comes after years of nationwide opposition to NEP 2020, which AISEC criticizes as a centralized and top-down imposition that bypassed parliamentary debate and ignored the voices of key stakeholders. AISEC points out that the NEP was finalized during the COVID-19 lockdown and was never placed before Parliament, despite education being a subject on the Concurrent List requiring both central and state collaboration.
According to AISEC, NEP 2020 undermines the constitutional promise of equality in education by promoting privatization, commercialization, and online models of learning that exclude large sections of the population. It notes that the NEP's vision is heavily skewed toward central control and market-oriented goals, and it dangerously opens the door to religious and ideological indoctrination under the guise of “decolonizing” Indian education.
In contrast, the People’s Education Policy 2025 is rooted in the values of social justice, pluralism, and federalism. The document traces the historical evolution of education in India—from its exclusionary nature in ancient and medieval times to the role played by modern social reformers and freedom fighters in advocating for mass education. The policy acknowledges past efforts post-independence to universalize education but highlights persistent disparities in access, quality, and infrastructure, especially for rural, marginalized, and economically disadvantaged communities.
PEP 2025 outlines a vision for a robust public education system that is fully state-funded and democratically governed. It opposes the NEP’s 5+3+3+4 structural shift and instead reaffirms the 10+2 framework, integrating pre-primary, primary, and middle schooling into a cohesive system. The draft calls for free and compulsory education up to Class 12, with state responsibility for funding infrastructure, hiring qualified teachers, and ensuring uniform standards across rural and urban areas.
The draft policy pays detailed attention to addressing educational disparities. It proposes specific strategies for improving access and quality in rural schools, increasing girls’ enrollment through gender-sensitive curriculum reforms, ensuring educational support for socially disadvantaged groups like Scheduled Castes and Tribes, and expanding facilities for children with physical and mental disabilities. It also recognizes the challenges faced by children of migrant workers, street children, and others on the social margins, demanding inclusive measures to integrate them into mainstream education.
The People’s Education Policy places strong emphasis on keeping school curricula secular, scientific, and rational. It argues for eliminating content that reinforces caste, gender, and religious stereotypes and calls for a curriculum that fosters critical thinking, mutual respect, and constitutional values. It opposes any interference by political authorities in syllabus-making and urges that curriculum decisions be left to independent academic bodies composed of educators and experts.
At the higher education level, PEP 2025 strongly opposes centralized entrance tests like CUET and NEET, advocating instead for admissions based on local and institutional processes. It criticizes the NEP's “entry and exit” system for degrees as disruptive and misleading, and calls for stable three-year and four-year structures based on disciplinary requirements. The policy also raises concerns over the unchecked growth of private universities and insists that the government must not allow self-financing models in public institutions.
In the domain of research, the draft insists on academic freedom, ethical standards, and adequate public funding. It supports the reinstatement of M.Phil programmes and demands stipends and fellowships for all research scholars, while rejecting government interference in topic selection or research direction.
On professional education, including engineering, medicine, law, and agriculture, the draft policy calls for periodic curriculum updates, government funding, and a scientific approach. It rejects practices such as capitation fees and management/NRI quotas in professional institutions and emphasizes that all professional courses must also include humanities subjects to nurture socially conscious graduates.
AISEC has called for wide-ranging discussions on the draft across the country. “This is only a draft,” said a representative of the Committee, “and we will continue to hold consultations with all stakeholders before finalizing the policy. Our aim is to present a truly people-centric education framework, one that fulfills the constitutional promise and the dreams of India’s freedom fighters.”
The final version of the People’s Education Policy 2025, once revised based on public feedback, will be placed before a National People’s Parliament and then submitted to the central and state governments with a demand for its implementation.
In a climate of growing concern over the direction of India's education system, the release of this draft signals a determined pushback from civil society. It seeks to reclaim education as a public good, a tool of empowerment, and a cornerstone of a democratic and egalitarian society.

Comments

  1. AnonymousJune 01, 2025

    Happy to know about the release of People’s Education Policy. It seems to reflect the views of common man.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

NOTE: Hateful, abusive comments won't be published. -- Editor

TRENDING

Neville Cardus: The man who turned cricket writing into poetry

By Harsh Thakor*  Neville Cardus was one of the most remarkable literary figures of the twentieth century. A prolific English writer and critic, he achieved distinction in two vastly different fields: cricket and classical music. Entirely self-taught, Cardus rose from humble beginnings to become both the cricket correspondent and chief music critic of The Manchester Guardian . His achievements in these contrasting disciplines earned him widespread acclaim and established him as one of the foremost critics of his generation. In February 2025, the cricketing and literary world marked the fiftieth anniversary of his death, which occurred in February 1975.

​Ideological shifts and structural realities within India's left-wing insurgency

​By Harsh Thakor*  The Maoist insurgency in India is arguably at its weakest point since the formation of the Communist Party of India (Maoist) in 2004. Years of sustained counterinsurgency operations, leadership losses, shrinking territorial influence, declining recruitment, and growing technological advantages enjoyed by the state have significantly eroded the movement's operational capabilities. 

The Dalit body on screen: Stereotypes, sacrifice, and subjugation in Hindi films

By Dr. Prem Singh*  Despite centuries of reformist efforts, from Gandhi and Ambedkar to contemporary activists, the caste system remains deeply embedded in the Indian psyche. One of the primary reasons for this persistence is the religious sanction provided by Brahminical scriptures, which have shaped not only social structures but also cultural and artistic expressions.