Complaint filed against BJP MP Nishikant Dubey over alleged communal remarks

By A Representative

A formal complaint has been lodged against BJP Member of Parliament Nishikant Dubey (Godda, Jharkhand) for allegedly making communal and inflammatory remarks targeting former Chief Election Commissioner S.Y. Quraishi. The complaint, filed by human rights activist and former bureaucrat Harsh Mander, has been submitted to the Station House Officer of Hauz Khas Police Station in New Delhi.

The remarks in question were made by Dubey on social media platform X (formerly Twitter) on April 20, 2025. In his post, Dubey referred to Quraishi as a "Muslim Commissioner" and accused him of facilitating the registration of Bangladeshi infiltrators as voters in Jharkhand’s Santhal Pargana region during his tenure. The post further included inflammatory references to Prophet Muhammad and India's partition, which the complaint argues could incite communal hatred and disturb public harmony.

Mander’s complaint calls for the immediate registration of an FIR under Sections 196 and 197 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023, which address the promotion of enmity between different groups and disloyalty to the Constitution based on religion or community. It also draws attention to a pattern of similar communal statements allegedly made by Dubey over the past three years.

Highlighting the urgency of the situation, the complaint cites the Supreme Court's judgment in Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay v. Union of India (WP Civil No. 943/2021), which mandates swift, suo motu legal action in instances of hate speech. It urges the police to act promptly to uphold India's secular values and curb the rising normalization of hate speech within political discourse.

Karwan-e-Mohabbat, the human rights collective associated with Harsh Mander, emphasized in its communication with media outlets that the issue holds significant public interest and warrants wide coverage to ensure transparency and accountability from public representatives.

This development has once again spotlighted growing concerns about the impact of divisive rhetoric on India’s social fabric and the pressing need for elected leaders to be held to constitutional standards of conduct.

Xi Jinping’s visit to USA: Recognition that China can't be contained?

By Vijay Prashad President Xi Jinping’s forthcoming visit to the United States must be understood as more than an encounter between two heads of state, but it must be seen as an encounter between two possible futures. In one future, the United States imposes a spiral of confrontation against China. Trade disputes harden into economic warfare, then economic warfare intensifies into technological blockades, technological blockades produce military encirclement, and finally military encirclement creates incidents, and incidents the danger of becoming an unimaginable war.

Swaminarayan, untouchability and the 'we are not Hindu' argument

By Rajiv Shah Following my blog on why the Eiffel Tower authorities should take all the blame for giving in to the Swaminarayan sadhus ’ bizarre demand to “invisibilise” women, including its female staff, during their visit to the internationally renowned Paris tourist centre on September 5, an interesting comment by one of the top academics drew my attention to something I vaguely knew about one of India’s most powerful and richest religious sects.

From margins to microphones: The rise of Dalit hip-hop in India

By Tersina Maria Toppo* A protest does not always arrive as a slogan shouted from a street corner. Sometimes, it arrives on a beat. A microphone replaces the megaphone, a music video becomes a public square, and the smartphone becomes the space where a history once pushed to the margins is narrated, debated, and shared.

Counterview

Search This Blog