Skip to main content

PUCL files complaint with SC against Gujarat police, municipal authorities for 'unlawful' demolitions, custodial 'violence'

By A Representative
 
The People's Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) has lodged a formal complaint with the Chief Justice of India, urging the Supreme Court to initiate suo-moto contempt proceedings against the police and municipal authorities in Ahmedabad, Gujarat. The complaint alleges that these officials have engaged in unlawful demolitions and custodial violence, in direct violation of a Supreme Court order issued in November 2024.
The incident in question occurred on March 14, 2025, in the Vastral area of Ahmedabad, where a group of alleged anti-social elements armed with swords, iron pipes, and lathis terrorized locals and commuters. The violence resulted in several injuries and widespread property damage. Videos of the incident quickly went viral on social media, sparking public outrage.
In response, the police apprehended several suspects and, in a highly controversial move, publicly beat them and demolished their homes, allegedly in coordination with the Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation. The police also arrested family members of the accused, who were not involved in the crime, and severed utility connections to their homes. These actions were reportedly carried out under the guise of targeting "illegal constructions."
The PUCL has condemned these actions as a blatant violation of the Supreme Court's guidelines laid down in the D.K. Basu vs. State of West Bengal case (1997), which safeguards against custodial violence, and the Court's November 2024 order, which declared demolitions based solely on criminal charges without due process as unconstitutional.
In their letter to the Chief Justice, PUCL representatives Anand Yagnik and Mujahid Nafees emphasized the importance of upholding the rule of law and due process, warning that such transgressions could lead to a breakdown of the justice delivery system. They have called for urgent action to hold the erring officers accountable for their actions.
The PUCL has also provided video links (see this and this) and newspaper clippings ( click here and here) as evidence of the incidents, including footage of the police beating suspects and demolishing homes. The organization hopes that the Supreme Court will take cognizance of the matter and ensure that such violations of constitutional rights are not repeated.
The PUCL's complaint underscores the ongoing tension between law enforcement and civil liberties in India, raising critical questions about the balance between swift justice and the protection of constitutional rights.

Comments

TRENDING

Xi Jinping’s visit to USA: Recognition that China can't be contained?

By Vijay Prashad   President Xi Jinping’s forthcoming visit to the United States must be understood as more than an encounter between two heads of state, but it must be seen as an encounter between two possible futures. In one future, the United States imposes a spiral of confrontation against China. Trade disputes harden into economic warfare, then economic warfare intensifies into technological blockades, technological blockades produce military encirclement, and finally military encirclement creates incidents, and incidents the danger of becoming an unimaginable war.

Swaminarayan, untouchability and the 'we are not Hindu' argument

By Rajiv Shah   Following my blog on why the Eiffel Tower authorities should take all the blame for giving in to the Swaminarayan sadhus ’ bizarre demand to “invisibilise” women, including its female staff, during their visit to the internationally renowned Paris tourist centre on September 5, an interesting comment by one of the top academics drew my attention to something I vaguely knew about one of India’s most powerful and richest religious sects.

From margins to microphones: The rise of Dalit hip-hop in India

By Tersina Maria Toppo*  A protest does not always arrive as a slogan shouted from a street corner. Sometimes, it arrives on a beat. A microphone replaces the megaphone, a music video becomes a public square, and the smartphone becomes the space where a history once pushed to the margins is narrated, debated, and shared.