Skip to main content

Pension Parishad demands budget should address glaring inadequacies in social security pensions

By A Representative 
As the Union Budget 2025-2026 approaches, the Pension Parishad has issued a strong appeal to address the glaring inadequacies in social security pensions allocated for the elderly, single women, persons with disabilities, and other vulnerable groups. Despite over 10.4 crore senior citizens in India, the National Social Assistance Programme (NSAP) continues to be grossly underfunded, with a stagnant allocation of ₹9,500 crores—a figure unchanged for over a decade.
Currently, pension amounts remain shockingly low: ₹200 per month for individuals aged 60–79, and ₹500 for those above 79 years, unchanged since 2007. Accounting for inflation, the real value of ₹200 in 2007 has plummeted to ₹7 per day in 2023, leaving pensioners unable to meet even basic needs. The Pension Parishad highlighted that while the country’s total budget grew nearly 30 times from 2007–08 to 2023–24, allocations for pensions have remained static, reflecting a deep disregard for economic vulnerabilities.
The administrative hurdles faced by beneficiaries exacerbate the situation. Pensioners frequently encounter months-long delays in payments, Aadhaar-linked exclusions, and challenges related to uploading disability certificates on the UDID Portal. For instance, Rajasthan has faced a complete halt in new disability pension applications since March 2024, leaving thousands stranded without their rightful benefits.
The Pension Parishad emphasized India’s poor standing in global comparisons. Neighboring countries like Nepal and Sri Lanka provide significantly higher social security pensions despite having smaller GDPs. Meanwhile, Indian pensioners struggle with amounts that fail to secure dignity or survival.
Key Demands
The press release outlined specific demands ahead of the Budget 2025-2026:
1. Universal and Non-Contributory Pensions: A minimum pension of ₹4,000 per month, indexed to inflation, split equally between the Centre and state governments.
2. Inflation-Indexed Pensions: Regular revisions of pension amounts to maintain purchasing power.
3. Universal Coverage: Expansion of pension benefits to all households under the National Food Security Act (NFSA), removing the restrictive BPL criteria.
4. Abolition of Aadhaar Mandate: Ensuring Aadhaar is not a barrier to accessing entitlements under the NSAP.
Call for Urgent Action
The Pension Parishad warned that continued neglect of social security pensions would deepen inequality and violate the basic rights of vulnerable groups. As the nation strives for a "Viksit Bharat" (developed India), the government must reflect its commitment to justice and equity in this year’s budget. Anything less, the Parishad stated, would not only be inadequate but inhumane.
The ball is now in the government’s court to prove whether it values the dignity and survival of its elderly and vulnerable citizens or chooses to turn a blind eye to their plight.

Comments

Post a Comment

TRENDING

Swaminarayan, untouchability and the 'we are not Hindu' argument

By Rajiv Shah   Following my blog on why the Eiffel Tower authorities should take all the blame for giving in to the Swaminarayan sadhus ’ bizarre demand to “invisibilise” women, including its female staff, during their visit to the internationally renowned Paris tourist centre on September 5, an interesting comment by one of the top academics drew my attention to something I vaguely knew about one of India’s most powerful and richest religious sects.
Post a Comment
»

From margins to microphones: The rise of Dalit hip-hop in India

By Tersina Maria Toppo*  A protest does not always arrive as a slogan shouted from a street corner. Sometimes, it arrives on a beat. A microphone replaces the megaphone, a music video becomes a public square, and the smartphone becomes the space where a history once pushed to the margins is narrated, debated, and shared.
Post a Comment
»

Xi Jinping’s visit to USA: Recognition that China can't be contained?

By Vijay Prashad   President Xi Jinping’s forthcoming visit to the United States must be understood as more than an encounter between two heads of state, but it must be seen as an encounter between two possible futures. In one future, the United States imposes a spiral of confrontation against China. Trade disputes harden into economic warfare, then economic warfare intensifies into technological blockades, technological blockades produce military encirclement, and finally military encirclement creates incidents, and incidents the danger of becoming an unimaginable war.
Post a Comment
»