Skip to main content

EVs vs fossil fuel vehicles: None discusses critical need to minimise cars on road

By Shankar Sharma* 

Two recent study reports by two elite engineering institutes, as in the links below, throw up more issues than they seem to have addressed. From the overall welfare considerations of our society, it should be a matter of concern that many such studies seem to focus only on one or two narrow issues, that too from only an engineering/ finance perspective, while not providing adequate focus to larger societal welfare issues surrounding the same.
Since the pollution from fossil fuels is considered as the most pressing concern from the global warming perspective, the consequences of not deploying EVs (not just E Cars but various forms of E-driven vehicles) should be diligently considered. Unfortunately, the local as well as global level consequences of scenarios of not moving from our fossil fuel dependent economy urgently to cleaner sources of energy, are not diligently discussed. Whereas, it is true that various mining activities required to manufacture the battery system for such EVs are also polluting, many technological innovations going on around the world will be able to minimise such point source of pollution, the continued usage of fossil fuels in any form can only pollute the larger atmosphere, and thus will hasten the climate change phenomenon.
Also very unfortunate is the fact that none of such discussions are even mentioning the critical importance of minimising the very need for the enormous number of vehicles plying on the road, and which are only escalating in number with the passage of each year. Without such a holistic perspective of the overall welfare of all sections of the global society on a sustainable basis, including that of flora, fauna and the general environment, the analysis of EVs vs fossil fuel vehicles, cannot be seen as anything useful to our society.
"The study reports that electric cars are not the most eco-friendly option when compared to hybrid electric vehicles and internal combustion vehicles."
The other study report of concern is on the conclusion that the Wind energy may assist meeting adequately the coolant power needs in nuclear plants. It is an issue that many articles/ reports on nuclear power technology seem to focus only on a narrow perspective of the associated technological concerns, while ignoring the critical issue of the very need for nuclear power in India considering unacceptable costs/ threats from nuclear power technology.
"Given India's pursuit of nuclear energy development and the inevitable presence of seismic and tsunami threats in close proximity, it becomes imperative to enhance the safety of nuclear structures to the highest degree possible."
How well our society will be served by such elite institutions if they also focus on the overall welfare needs of our people, costs/ risks associated with such technologies, and the credible alternatives available to our society.
---
Power & Climate Policy Analyst

Comments

TRENDING

Swaminarayan, untouchability and the 'we are not Hindu' argument

By Rajiv Shah   Following my blog on why the Eiffel Tower authorities should take all the blame for giving in to the Swaminarayan sadhus ’ bizarre demand to “invisibilise” women, including its female staff, during their visit to the internationally renowned Paris tourist centre on September 5, an interesting comment by one of the top academics drew my attention to something I vaguely knew about one of India’s most powerful and richest religious sects.

From margins to microphones: The rise of Dalit hip-hop in India

By Tersina Maria Toppo*  A protest does not always arrive as a slogan shouted from a street corner. Sometimes, it arrives on a beat. A microphone replaces the megaphone, a music video becomes a public square, and the smartphone becomes the space where a history once pushed to the margins is narrated, debated, and shared.

Xi Jinping’s visit to USA: Recognition that China can't be contained?

By Vijay Prashad   President Xi Jinping’s forthcoming visit to the United States must be understood as more than an encounter between two heads of state, but it must be seen as an encounter between two possible futures. In one future, the United States imposes a spiral of confrontation against China. Trade disputes harden into economic warfare, then economic warfare intensifies into technological blockades, technological blockades produce military encirclement, and finally military encirclement creates incidents, and incidents the danger of becoming an unimaginable war.