Skip to main content

'Irresponsible': Niti Aayog favouring energy technologies sans cost-benefit analysis

By Shankar Sharma* 

Whereas most of the recent projections done by the International Energy Agency (IEA) for India (by 2030), should have been clear to any modest observer of the Indian energy/ economy scenario, some of the data mentioned in this scenario projection should be of lot more concern to our people as compared to what has been said so far by the domestic media houses on the topic so far.
Some of such disconcerting facts, as highlighted by IEA, are:
  • India is likely to see the world's biggest rise in energy demand this decade, with demand climbing 3 per cent annually due to urbanisation and industrialisation.
  • While the push for renewable energy will see it meeting as much as 60 per cent of the growth in demand for power, coal will continue to meet a third of overall energy demand by 2030 and another quarter will be met by oil.
  • Even though India continues to make great strides with renewables deployment and efficiency policies, the sheer scale of its development means that the combined import bill for fossil fuels doubles over the next two decades, with oil by far the largest component.
  • Coal generation is projected to continue to expand in absolute terms, peaking around 2030, though its share of electricity generation falls from just below 75 per cent to 55 per cent over this period.
  • Gas imports will double to reach nearly 70 bcm by 2030 before growth moderating to reach 90 bcm by 2050.
As has been the case in the past, IEA focuses only on such dry statistics without bothering about the social and environmental consequences of such a huge growth in energy demand. IEA, rarely if ever, has discussed the social and environmental consequences to the larger society from the technologies it had advocated.
For many decades it had advocated fossil fuel technologies; and now it is advocating the nuclear power technology; in both cases it has been proved to be less than responsible. This practice can be seen as a typical Western style approach to the welfare of a society, which rarely, if ever, focuses on environmental impacts.
It should be a matter of great concern that our authorities, especially NITI Aayog, also are adopting such irresponsible advocacy on energy technologies without diligently considering costs and benefits, and hence are failing in public expectations.
But the communities in India cannot and must not commit the blunder of ignoring the social and environmental impacts. At a high level, it suffices to say that the social and environmental impacts of such a massive growth in demand for energy, are most likely to pose very serious problems to our communities across the country.
Such problems are already life threatening to many sections of our people; but sadly, it is also true that our officials and ministers are refusing to acknowledge the same. Pollution/ contamination of air, water and soil, are already clearly visible, and the annihilation of forest and fresh water resources are being reported regularly from different parts of the country.
The IEA projections that India's energy demand growth will be the highest across the globe cannot be a matter of any pride. Such a massive energy demand growth shall only mean unacceptable demand/ impacts on our natural resources (agricultural lands, forests, fresh water resources, clean air, biodiversity etc.), and consequent health and social welfare issues.
For many decades IEA had advocated fossil fuel technologies; and now it is advocating nuclear power technology
It is not only critical that as a welfare oriented and responsible society, we need to do all that is feasible to minimise such energy demand growth, but its is also essential that we start immediately to embark on clean energy transition pathway; that too by responsibly taking into account the total costs to the society of every technology/ practice needed to meet such a demand for energy on a sustainable and equitable basis. But sadly, our bureaucrats and political leaders cannot be seen as demonstrating adequate care in this regard.
In the true context of many such concerns, there is an urgent need for civil society to initiate rational debate at various levels of our society on the very issue of high GDP growth rate paradigm, which is being pursued by successive governments, and which is synonymous with the ambition of 10-30 trillion Dollar economy in the next few decades, and which will definitely lead to unsustainable demand for energy and materials at unacceptable costs to our communities.
In the larger context of true welfare of our people, it is left to civil society groups to take the necessary initiatives, such as providing credible feedback to the concerned ministries on various policy documents/ announcements, such as draft national electricity plan (2022-27/32).
The policies, omissions and commissions in the national energy sector are critically important for our future, because it is estimated by credible global agencies that about 75% of all the global GHG emissions can be directly/ indirectly attributed to the energy sector.
Hence, the highest possible efficiencies and true accountability must become the basic tenets of our energy/electricity policy. But sadly, they are the least important mandates in our governance structure.
Some of the recent news reports of importance in the larger context of consequences of high energy demand and the associated technologies, are as in the links below.
A society can continue to ignore such unambiguous signals of calamitous threats only at it own peril.
---
*Power & Climate Policy Analyst

Comments

TRENDING

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Jayanthi Natarajan "never stood by tribals' rights" in MNC Vedanta's move to mine Niyamigiri Hills in Odisha

By A Representative The Odisha Chapter of the Campaign for Survival and Dignity (CSD), which played a vital role in the struggle for the enactment of historic Forest Rights Act, 2006 has blamed former Union environment minister Jaynaynthi Natarjan for failing to play any vital role to defend the tribals' rights in the forest areas during her tenure under the former UPA government. Countering her recent statement that she rejected environmental clearance to Vendanta, the top UK-based NMC, despite tremendous pressure from her colleagues in Cabinet and huge criticism from industry, and the claim that her decision was “upheld by the Supreme Court”, the CSD said this is simply not true, and actually she "disrespected" FRA.

Urgent need to study cause of large number of natural deaths in Gulf countries

By Venkatesh Nayak* According to data tabled in Parliament in April 2018, there are 87.76 lakh (8.77 million) Indians in six Gulf countries, namely Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates (UAE). While replying to an Unstarred Question (#6091) raised in the Lok Sabha, the Union Minister of State for External Affairs said, during the first half of this financial year alone (between April-September 2018), blue-collared Indian workers in these countries had remitted USD 33.47 Billion back home. Not much is known about the human cost of such earnings which swell up the country’s forex reserves quietly. My recent RTI intervention and research of proceedings in Parliament has revealed that between 2012 and mid-2018 more than 24,570 Indian Workers died in these Gulf countries. This works out to an average of more than 10 deaths per day. For every US$ 1 Billion they remitted to India during the same period there were at least 117 deaths of Indian Workers in Gulf ...

Stands 'exposed': Cavalier attitude towards rushed construction of Char Dham project

By Bharat Dogra*  The nation heaved a big sigh of relief when the 41 workers trapped in the under-construction Silkyara-Barkot tunnel (Uttarkashi district of Uttarakhand) were finally rescued on November 28 after a 17-day rescue effort. All those involved in the rescue effort deserve a big thanks of the entire country. The government deserves appreciation for providing all-round support.

Uttarakhand tunnel disaster: 'Question mark' on rescue plan, appraisal, construction

By Bhim Singh Rawat*  As many as 40 workers were trapped inside Barkot-Silkyara tunnel in Uttarkashi after a portion of the 4.5 km long, supposedly completed portion of the tunnel, collapsed early morning on Sunday, Nov 12, 2023. The incident has once again raised several questions over negligence in planning, appraisal and construction, absence of emergency rescue plan, violations of labour laws and environmental norms resulting in this avoidable accident.

Celebrating 125 yr old legacy of healthcare work of missionaries

Vilas Shende, director, Mure Memorial Hospital By Moin Qazi* Central India has been one of the most fertile belts for several unique experiments undertaken by missionaries in the field of education and healthcare. The result is a network of several well-known schools, colleges and hospitals that have woven themselves into the social landscape of the region. They have also become a byword for quality and affordable services delivered to all sections of the society. These institutions are characterised by committed and compassionate staff driven by the selfless pursuit of improving the well-being of society. This is the reason why the region has nursed and nurtured so many eminent people who occupy high positions in varied fields across the country as well as beyond. One of the fruits of this legacy is a more than century old iconic hospital that nestles in the heart of Nagpur city. Named as Mure Memorial Hospital after a British warrior who lost his life in a war while defending his cou...

New RTI draft rules inspired by citizen-unfriendly, overtly bureaucratic approach

By Venkatesh Nayak* The Department of Personnel and Training , Government of India has invited comments on a new set of Draft Rules (available in English only) to implement The Right to Information Act, 2005 . The RTI Rules were last amended in 2012 after a long period of consultation with various stakeholders. The Government’s move to put the draft RTI Rules out for people’s comments and suggestions for change is a welcome continuation of the tradition of public consultation. Positive aspects of the Draft RTI Rules While 60-65% of the Draft RTI Rules repeat the content of the 2012 RTI Rules, some new aspects deserve appreciation as they clarify the manner of implementation of key provisions of the RTI Act. These are: Provisions for dealing with non-compliance of the orders and directives of the Central Information Commission (CIC) by public authorities- this was missing in the 2012 RTI Rules. Non-compliance is increasingly becoming a major problem- two of my non-compliance cases are...

Dowry over duty: How material greed shattered a seven-year bond

By Archana Kumar*  This account does not seek to expose names or tarnish identities. Its purpose is not to cast blame, but to articulate—with dignity—the silent suffering of a woman who lived her life anchored in love, trust, and duty, only to be ultimately abandoned.

Pairing not with law but with perpetrators: Pavlovian response to lynchings in India

By Vikash Narain Rai* Lynch-law owes its name to James Lynch, the legendary Warden of Galway, Ireland, who tried, condemned and executed his own son in 1493 for defrauding and killing strangers. But, today, what kind of a person will justify the lynching for any reason whatsoever? Will perhaps resemble the proverbial ‘wrong man to meet at wrong road at night!’