Skip to main content

India ranks 'abysmally low', Bangladesh scores better: UN human development report

By Prasanna Mohanty*

Human capital development is critical for the growth and development of any economy, but that is where India remains a global outlier, in spite of having entered the “Amrit Kaal” and becoming the fifth-largest economy in 2022. The latest Human Development Index (HDI) of the UN, released last week, confirms this, notwithstanding the fact that the pandemic impacted all countries adversely. Poor quality of human resources alone would prevent India from capitalizing on its demographic opportunity – 27.2% of the young population (15-29 years in 2021) in a rapidly ageing world.
The HDI measures health (life expectancy), education (years of schooling) and income (per capita) and hence, measures the “development of a country”, rather than just economic growth (income or GDP). The UN report shows India’s rank remains abysmally low (in 2021) at number 132 among 191 countries – falling from 131 of 189 countries in 2020. Its (composite) score of 0.633 (on a 0-1 scale) is well below the global average of 0.732. The top 28 countries score more than 0.9. Even Bangladesh has a higher score of 0.661.
Let this sink in for what that indicates.
The disaggregate score reveals India’s global standing is even worse in health and education. In health (life expectancy), it stands at 135 with a life expectancy of 67.2 years. The world average is 71.4 years. Bangladesh at 72.4 years scores above India. In education (mean years of schooling), India stands at 139 with average schooling years of 6.7 years, while the global average is 8.6 years. Bangladesh scores much higher than India at 7.4 years. In income (GNI per capita 2017 PPP in $), India is a little better and stands at 126 ($6,590) and higher than Bangladesh ($5,472), but the global average is $16,572 – 2.5 times more than India’s.
The UN’s 2022 HDI report reveals India remains at the bottom pile of countries in health, education and income levels
The HDI also reveals another dark side of India: high inequality.
The higher the inequality, the greater the threat to sustained growth and better socio-economic outcomes. Like all averages, HDI masks inequality in the distribution of human development across the population. Called inequality-adjusted HDI (IHDI), India’s (composite) score in it is 0.475 (on a 0 to 1 scale) – a loss of 25% from the HDI score. The global average of IHDI is 0.59 and the loss due to inequality is 19.4% – much lower than India’s. Bangladesh has less inequality than India (IHDI of 0.503 and loss due to inequality of 23.9%).
The HDI report also maps gender inequality – another critical element for sustained growth. Here too, India is ranked way low at 132 with a score of 0.49 – lower than Bangladesh’s 0.53 but a little higher than the global average of 0.47.
Yet another element of the UN’s HDI report is the multidimensional poverty index (MPI) – again measured in terms of health, education and standard of living and shows the deprivation levels of a population. Here, needless to say, India tops the chart – with 369.6 million multidimensionally poor in 2015-16, the year of last survey for India.
Further, 22.5% of its population lived in “extreme poverty” or PPP of $1.9 per day of living expenses, or below in 2015-16. After a series of missteps (demonetisation and botched GDT) and the pandemic, the numbers would have gone up substantially.
All these point to one definitive conclusion: India is headed to a demographic curse unless immediate course correction takes place.
---
*Source: Centre for Financial Accountability . Download full report here

Comments

  1. 1. Author’s Bame?
    2. Research Team’s Profile?
    3. Research Formula?
    4. Research locations in India?
    5. Number of Research Samples?
    6. Whether any GOI representation in rear Team?
    7. Locations?

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

NOTE: Hateful, abusive comments won't be published. -- Editor

TRENDING

Neville Cardus: The man who turned cricket writing into poetry

By Harsh Thakor*  Neville Cardus was one of the most remarkable literary figures of the twentieth century. A prolific English writer and critic, he achieved distinction in two vastly different fields: cricket and classical music. Entirely self-taught, Cardus rose from humble beginnings to become both the cricket correspondent and chief music critic of The Manchester Guardian . His achievements in these contrasting disciplines earned him widespread acclaim and established him as one of the foremost critics of his generation. In February 2025, the cricketing and literary world marked the fiftieth anniversary of his death, which occurred in February 1975.

​Ideological shifts and structural realities within India's left-wing insurgency

​By Harsh Thakor*  The Maoist insurgency in India is arguably at its weakest point since the formation of the Communist Party of India (Maoist) in 2004. Years of sustained counterinsurgency operations, leadership losses, shrinking territorial influence, declining recruitment, and growing technological advantages enjoyed by the state have significantly eroded the movement's operational capabilities. 

The Dalit body on screen: Stereotypes, sacrifice, and subjugation in Hindi films

By Dr. Prem Singh*  Despite centuries of reformist efforts, from Gandhi and Ambedkar to contemporary activists, the caste system remains deeply embedded in the Indian psyche. One of the primary reasons for this persistence is the religious sanction provided by Brahminical scriptures, which have shaped not only social structures but also cultural and artistic expressions.