Skip to main content

BSF action to grab poor Bengal farmers' land 'arbitrary', affects villagers' life, livelihood

Counterview Desk 

The Border Security Force (BSF) allegedly grabbed the land of two marginal farmers “on orders from above” in January this year in Dinajpur district of West Bengal, yet, despite complaints to the administrative and police authorities, no action has been taken in this regard, says a complaint filed with the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) chairman.
In a plea, based on a finding of a fact-finding team, to the NHRC chairman, Kirity Roy, secretary, Banglar Manabadhikar Suraksha Mancha (MASUM), and national convenor Programme Against Custodial Torture & Impunity (PACTI), Hooghly, said, the land acquisition “has not complied with the Land Acquisition Act, 1894"; hence it is “illegal grabbing”.

Text:

I want to attract your attention towards the illegitimate restrictions and livelihood violation of the villagers of Dhalgaon village of 1 no Bhatol Gram Panchayat under Raiganj Block and police station in North Dinajpur District of West Bengal by the Border Security Force personnel with ECO company of Poriyal border outpost under 72 battalion BSF
About 1,500 people reside in the Dhalgaon village, where out of the total population about 850 are male and 650 are female. Almost 80 percent of the villagers belong from Muslim Other Backward Class (OBC) and 20 percent from Hindu Scheduled Caste (Dalit) backgrounds.
About 1,800 bigha of cultivable land in the village is located outside the border fencing, which is heavily guarded by the Border Security Force (BSF). In this village there are no government hospitals, no ration shop, only one SSK (Sishu Siksha Karmasuchi) school is situated in this village. There is no secondary and higher secondary school in this village.
The condition of the village road is very bad. Most of the roads in the village are not metalled. Due to the plying of BSF vehicles on the village road, the condition of the road became more deteriorated. There are no irrigation facilities in the village.
Taslim Ali and Mahamuddin Mohammad are two residents of Dhalgaon village. Previously, Taslim Ali resided in the land situated 20 meter distance from the Central Public Works Department (CPWD) Road and in front of fencing gate number 18 of Pariyal Border Out Post. In the year 1989 Taslim Ali and his wife Rejina Khatun bought a total 12.20 satak of land under Dhalgaon Mouza, JL No 11 from Jasera Begum, Md Bellal Sarkar, Buna Khatun, Laila Khatun, Rehena Khatun and Nureja Khatun in consideration of Rs. 4,11,750.
But due to illegitimate and arbitrary restriction by the BSF personnel attached with Pariyal Border Out Post, he moved away from that place and made a house far from the border fencing. Now he runs his family by cultivating different vegetables in that land where he previously resided.
Mahamuddin Mohammad is also the owner of the 0.06 acre land under Dhalgaon Mouza, JL No 11, Khatian No 312. The said land is situated between Parial Border Out Post and the fencing gate number 18 in front of the railing number 1419-1397 and 20 to 75 meter distance from the barbed wire.
Taslim Ali and Mahamuddin Mohammad both run their family by cultivating different vegetables and bananas in their land. On 15 January, 2022 at midnight Border Security Force personnel grabbed the whole land of Taslim Ali and Mahamuddin. BSF personnel buried bamboo poles at the margin of the land and the BSF Battalion number and Border Out Post there. 
They do not allow Taslim Ali and Mahamuddin to enter their agricultural field. From that day, they cannot work in their agricultural field. BSF told them that the area is now under BSF’s jurisdiction and therefore they possessed over those lands and cannot allow anyone to enter in that area.
Taslim and Mahamuddin informed the above stated incident to the Panchayat Pradhan of 1 no. Bhatol Gram Panchayat. Pnachayat Pradhan along with other members went to Pariyal Border Out Post but the BSF personnel did not listen to their words. BSF told them to bring the map of those lands from the Block Land and Land Revenue Office.
When Taslim and Mahamuddin went to the office of the Block Land and Land Revenue Officer, Raiganj and asked for a land map of that area, the officials refused to provide them any map of the bordering areas.
From January, 2022 they cannot enter their field. BSF personnel do not allow them to enter their fields. As they cannot cultivate vegetables in this season their monetary loss is about Rs. 50,000.
Our fact finding team talked with one Gram Panchayat member Prakash Barman. He informed that all villagers know the fact that the owners of those two lands are Taslim Ali and Mr. Mahamuddin Mohammad but BSF personnel by force grab those lands without showing any documentary evidence.
One Md Nasiruddin, aged about 55 years, son of late Abdul Jabbar, a resident of the Dhalgaon village informed our fact finding team that BSF personnel attached with Poriyal Border Out Post, ‘E’ Company, Battalion number 72 put illegitimate and arbitrary restrictions upon the agricultural activities of the villagers. For the last two years villagers cannot cultivate maize crops in their agricultural fields. BSF issued an arbitrary prohibition on the cultivation of the maize crops.
Our fact finding team talked with Madanlal, Post Commander of the Poriyal Border Out Post, ‘E’ Company, Battalion number 72. He informed that if there is any allegation of the villagers, they can file civil suit against them. They have an order from higher authority, so they have taken possession of the land. They do not want any harm to common people.
On 25.07.22, Mr.Taslim Ali and Mr. Mahamuddin lodged written complaints to the Block Development Officer of Raiganj block and the Sub-Divisional Officer of Raigunj Sub-Division and District Magistrate, Uttar Dinajpur. On 26.07.2022 Taslim Ali and Mahamuddin lodged written complaint to the local Bhatol Police Fari (Out Post).
But the on duty police person did not accept the complaint. As the local police did not take any action in this regard, on 02.08.2022 he sent one written complaint on the above stated matter to the Superintendent of Police of North Dinajpur through registered post. 
BSF move to restrict the entry of the victims in their agricultural field has plunged their families into deeper poverty
However, till time no actions were taken by the authority to seek out the matter. The whole process was not complied with The Land Acquisition Act, 1894; hence it is illegal grabbing of land by BSF.
These whimsical actions and arbitrary restriction imposed by the Border Security Force personnel of Poriyal Border Outposts upon the villagers of Dhalgaon is not only challenging their life and livelihood but also violating the Article 21 and Article 19 (1) (g) and 39(a) of the Constitution of India and Article 12 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
The plight of the villagers and denial of their proper livelihood practices is against the Articles 6 (Right to Work), 7 (Right to enjoyment just and favorable condition of work), 9 (Right to Social Security) and 11 (Right to adequate Standard of living) of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR) as well as the goal number 8 and 16 of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals.
In all these international instruments, the Government of India is a party and has taken pledge to adhere with. The affected farmers’ family is in poor financial condition. They earn their living from agricultural work but this arbitrary action of the BSF to restrict the entry of the victims in their agricultural field, has plunged their families into deeper poverty.
While the Government of India has been considering implementing the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals within 2030 and where the first goal is to eliminate poverty and eighth goal is to promote sustained inclusive and sustainable economic growth, full and productive employment and decent work for all, but the agent of the government (here BSF) by restricting the movement of the victim farmers in their agricultural land pushed them and their family members in the face of poverty and snatched their right to decent work.
The non-action of the concerned department after lodging the complaint by the victims before the administration also violates Goal number 16 of the UN SDG for providing access to justice for all. Illegal grabbing of the victim’s land by the BSF is a violation of Article 300A of the Indian Constitution, the right to enjoyment of personal property.
Under the circumstances, I request your urgent intervention in the following matters:
  • The whole process was not complied with The Land Acquisition Act, 1894; hence it is illegal grabbing of land by BSF.
  • The BSF should be careful about the villagers, where they posted.
  • The BSF should be posted at the zero point outside the village area.
  • The whole incident must be investigated by a neutral agency.
  • Block and District administration must take immediate steps for restoration of possession of those above stated lands to Mr. Taslim Ali and Mr. Mahamuddin Mohammad.
  • The BSF and / or district administration of Uttar Dinajpur should provide monetary compensation for the loss that the victim farmers have incurred.
  • Strict action should be taken against the BSF for illegally confiscating the victims’ land. As it is a civic offence, matters should be heard in open court of law.
  • The Block Land and Land Reforms Department, Raiganj immediately take proper steps against the perpetrator BSF personnel who grabbed the victims’ land and imposed illegal restriction to victim farmers to enter their agricultural field.
  • Safety and security of the victims must be ensured.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Whole article is far away from reality.

TRENDING

Vaccine nationalism? Covaxin isn't safe either, perhaps it's worse: Experts

By Rajiv Shah  I was a little awestruck: The news had already spread that Astrazeneca – whose Indian variant Covishield was delivered to nearly 80% of Indian vaccine recipients during the Covid-19 era – has been withdrawn by the manufacturers following the admission by its UK pharma giant that its Covid-19 vector-based vaccine in “rare” instances cause TTS, or “thrombocytopenia thrombosis syndrome”, which lead to the blood to clump and form clots. The vaccine reportedly led to at least 81 deaths in the UK.

'Scientifically flawed': 22 examples of the failure of vaccine passports

By Vratesh Srivastava*   Vaccine passports were introduced in late 2021 in a number of places across the world, with the primary objective of curtailing community spread and inducing "vaccine hesitant" people to get vaccinated, ostensibly to ensure herd immunity. The case for vaccine passports was scientifically flawed and ethically questionable.

'Misleading' ads: Are our celebrities and public figures acting responsibly?

By Deepika* It is imperative for celebrities and public figures to act responsibly while endorsing a consumer product, the Supreme Court said as it recently clamped down on misleading advertisements.

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

By Rajiv Shah*   The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual. 

Magnetic, stunning, Protima Bedi 'exposed' malice of sexual repression in society

By Harsh Thakor*  Protima Bedi was born to a baniya businessman and a Bengali mother as Protima Gupta in Delhi in 1949. Her father was a small-time trader, who was thrown out of his family for marrying a dark Bengali women. The theme of her early life was to rebel against traditional bondage. It was extraordinary how Protima underwent a metamorphosis from a conventional convent-educated girl into a freak. On October 12th was her 75th birthday; earlier this year, on August 18th it was her 25th death anniversary.

Palm oil industry deceptively using geenwashing to market products

By Athena*  Corporate hypocrisy is a masterclass in manipulation that mostly remains undetected by consumers and citizens. Companies often boast about their environmental and social responsibilities. Yet their actions betray these promises, creating a chasm between their public image and the grim on-the-ground reality. This duplicity and severely erodes public trust and undermines the strong foundations of our society.

'Fake encounter': 12 Adivasis killed being dubbed Maoists, says FACAM

Counterview Desk   The civil rights network* Forum Against Corporatization and Militarization (FACAM), even as condemn what it has called "fake encounter" of 12 Adivasi villagers in Gangaloor, has taken strong exception to they being presented by the authorities as Maoists.

No compensation to family, reluctance to file FIR: Manual scavengers' death

By Arun Khote, Sanjeev Kumar*  Recently, there have been four instances of horrifying deaths of sewer/septic tank workers in Uttar Pradesh. On 2 May, 2024, Shobran Yadav, 56, and his son Sushil Yadav, 28, died from suffocation while cleaning a sewer line in Lucknow’s Wazirganj area. In another incident on 3 May 2024, two workers Nooni Mandal, 36 and Kokan Mandal aka Tapan Mandal, 40 were killed while cleaning the septic tank in a house in Noida, Sector 26. The two workers were residents of Malda district of West Bengal and lived in the slum area of Noida Sector 9. 

India 'not keen' on legally binding global treaty to reduce plastic production

By Rajiv Shah  Even as offering lip-service to the United Nations Environment Agency (UNEA) for the need to curb plastic production, the Government of India appears reluctant in reducing the production of plastic. A senior participant at the UNEP’s fourth session of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee (INC-4), which took place in Ottawa in April last week, told a plastics pollution seminar that India, along with China and Russia, did not want any legally binding agreement for curbing plastic pollution.

Mired in controversy, India's polio jab programme 'led to suffering, misery'

By Vratesh Srivastava*  Following the 1988 World Health Assembly declaration to eradicate polio by the year 2000, to which India was a signatory, India ran intensive pulse polio immunization campaigns since 1995. After 19 years, in 2014, polio was declared officially eradicated in India. India was formally acknowledged by WHO as being free of polio.