Skip to main content

Ignoring land rights, forest dept 'harassing' tribal dwellers in the name of afforestation

Counterview Desk 

The civil rights group Jharkhand Janadhikar Mahasabha (JJM) has regretted that despite the promises of the Chief Minister, deprivation of forest rights of Adivasis-Moolvasis of Jharkhand and the intimidation of the Forest Department continues unabated in the state. 
In a statement, JJM said, "It is sad to note that on one hand, Adivasis-Moolvasis are being alienated from their forest rights, while on the other hand, they are also being troubled constantly at the hands of the forest department."
Giving specific instances of how this is happening, JJM said, the state government should "stop the displacement of people from the Adivasis-Moolvasis land under the garb of afforestation", adding, not only should pending forest rights claims be cleared, the cases lodged against innocent persons by the Forest Department should be urgently withdrawn.

Text:

JMM and Congress in their election manifestoes had ensured the appropriate implementation of the Forest Rights Act. Additionally, the election manifesto also guaranteed the forest lease and comprehensive rights over the forests. After the current government came into power, there have been multiple announcements with respect to the same; however, the status of its implementation at the ground level is paradoxical.
According to the Schedules Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act 2006, communities that are dependent on the forest have numerous rights. One of these rights provides that the forest dwellers who have been doing farming for livelihood can qualify as the claimant for ownership of that land (4 hectares).
Since the implementation of this Act in 2008, the Forest Department has been making countless efforts to alienate these rights from them. In the initial days, there were various instances of cases lodged against Adivasis and Moolvasis along with instance of displacement under the garb of afforestation initiatives. It is sad to note that on one hand, Adivasis-Moolvasis are being alienated from their forest rights, while on the other hand, they are also being troubled constantly at the hands of the forest department.
Recently two of such instances came up. In Gadgoma village in Bariyatu block located in the Latehar district, 25 traditional forest dwellers after completing the due legal process along with the necessary records, submitted the application for individual forest leases and community forest rights at the (Sub-divisional level) Forest Rights Committee. However, they have not received neither individual leases nor community forest rights.
On 7th December 2021, a few representatives from the Forest Department arrived at Gadgoma with the intention for afforestation for which the application for the forest lease had been made. On protesting against this, the people were intimidated by the threat of cases being lodged against them. In 2022, on the orders of the forest department, pits began to be dug. On 11th February 2022, a few women from the village filled the pits back with mud. On the same evening, the police arrested 2 young men- Dinesh Rana s/o Pravesh Rana and Ranjan Rana s/o America Rana. When the villagers went for police picketing at Bariyatu, the police mishandled them. Charges of filling the mud pit/ditch and obstructing government work have been filed against the two men and their fathers. The two men have also been sent to jail. At the FIR filed by the forest department, the fathers of the two men have been declared as absconding despite their presence at the police station. The two men stayed in the jail for a month and their fathers live in constant fear of incarceration.
Section 4(5) of the Forest Rights Act 2006 has clearly specified that “(5) Save as otherwise provided, no member of a forest dwelling Scheduled Tribe or other traditional forest dweller shall be evicted or removed from forest land under his occupation till the recognition and verification procedure is complete.” From the above instances, it is clear that the forest department is in violation of the law.
These similar situations prevail in the Beyang village of the Manika block. 40 other traditional forest dwellers had made applications for individual leases in 2018 and for community forest rights in 2021. However, they have not received them yet.
In December 2021, afforestation initiatives began in the above said land. On 4th January 2022, villagers submitted a written complaint to the Forest Divisional Officer at Latehar that the afforestation had begun without the consent of the Gram Sabha. They requested not to proceed with the plantation on their traditional land. As they received no response from the office, the villagers visited the DFO. However, they only got reassurances while the work continued in their villages.
At last, a claimant from the Schedule Caste community, Kundan K. Bhuiya made an application for an FIR against the Forest Divisional Officer, other forest department officers and a few bullies in the village under The Scheduled Caste and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and Section 166 of the Indian Penal Code. The station in charge refused to file an FIR. On 20th January 2022, the same was sent to the police station via registered post and with the help of the local MLA, the application was accepted on 23rd January 2022. Complaints regarding the same were also made to the police superintendent, but the FIR was never registered.
Similar instances have occurred at Shanti village in Baalumath block at Latehar district, Koyanjara and Chatakpur in Gumla, Bankheta and Sopahi in Ramna block of Garhwa district, Bishunia in Dhurki block, Ramar in Bhandaria block, Mahugain etc. These are only a handful of examples that depicts the situation of Adivasis-Moolvasis who are dependent on the forest and the working of the Forest Rights Act. Claims for lakhs of individual forest rights and thousands of acres of community forest land are pending. There is a huge gap between the promises of the Chief Minister and the proceedings of the Forest Department.
Jharkhand Janadhikar Mahasabha has the following demands from the State Government:
  • Stop the displacement of people from the Adivasis-Moolvasis land under the garb of afforestation
  • Urgent addressal of the pending forest rights claims and issuing the Forest Rights Claim
  • Withdrawal of the cases lodged against innocent persons by the Forest Department. Legal actions to be taken against the officials of the Forest Department for the violation of the forest and human rights of Adivasis-Moolvasis
  • Stop the illegal interference of the forest department officials in the process of implementation of the forest rights

Comments

TRENDING

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Jayanthi Natarajan "never stood by tribals' rights" in MNC Vedanta's move to mine Niyamigiri Hills in Odisha

By A Representative The Odisha Chapter of the Campaign for Survival and Dignity (CSD), which played a vital role in the struggle for the enactment of historic Forest Rights Act, 2006 has blamed former Union environment minister Jaynaynthi Natarjan for failing to play any vital role to defend the tribals' rights in the forest areas during her tenure under the former UPA government. Countering her recent statement that she rejected environmental clearance to Vendanta, the top UK-based NMC, despite tremendous pressure from her colleagues in Cabinet and huge criticism from industry, and the claim that her decision was “upheld by the Supreme Court”, the CSD said this is simply not true, and actually she "disrespected" FRA.

Stands 'exposed': Cavalier attitude towards rushed construction of Char Dham project

By Bharat Dogra*  The nation heaved a big sigh of relief when the 41 workers trapped in the under-construction Silkyara-Barkot tunnel (Uttarkashi district of Uttarakhand) were finally rescued on November 28 after a 17-day rescue effort. All those involved in the rescue effort deserve a big thanks of the entire country. The government deserves appreciation for providing all-round support.

Urgent need to study cause of large number of natural deaths in Gulf countries

By Venkatesh Nayak* According to data tabled in Parliament in April 2018, there are 87.76 lakh (8.77 million) Indians in six Gulf countries, namely Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates (UAE). While replying to an Unstarred Question (#6091) raised in the Lok Sabha, the Union Minister of State for External Affairs said, during the first half of this financial year alone (between April-September 2018), blue-collared Indian workers in these countries had remitted USD 33.47 Billion back home. Not much is known about the human cost of such earnings which swell up the country’s forex reserves quietly. My recent RTI intervention and research of proceedings in Parliament has revealed that between 2012 and mid-2018 more than 24,570 Indian Workers died in these Gulf countries. This works out to an average of more than 10 deaths per day. For every US$ 1 Billion they remitted to India during the same period there were at least 117 deaths of Indian Workers in Gulf ...

Uttarakhand tunnel disaster: 'Question mark' on rescue plan, appraisal, construction

By Bhim Singh Rawat*  As many as 40 workers were trapped inside Barkot-Silkyara tunnel in Uttarkashi after a portion of the 4.5 km long, supposedly completed portion of the tunnel, collapsed early morning on Sunday, Nov 12, 2023. The incident has once again raised several questions over negligence in planning, appraisal and construction, absence of emergency rescue plan, violations of labour laws and environmental norms resulting in this avoidable accident.

Celebrating 125 yr old legacy of healthcare work of missionaries

Vilas Shende, director, Mure Memorial Hospital By Moin Qazi* Central India has been one of the most fertile belts for several unique experiments undertaken by missionaries in the field of education and healthcare. The result is a network of several well-known schools, colleges and hospitals that have woven themselves into the social landscape of the region. They have also become a byword for quality and affordable services delivered to all sections of the society. These institutions are characterised by committed and compassionate staff driven by the selfless pursuit of improving the well-being of society. This is the reason why the region has nursed and nurtured so many eminent people who occupy high positions in varied fields across the country as well as beyond. One of the fruits of this legacy is a more than century old iconic hospital that nestles in the heart of Nagpur city. Named as Mure Memorial Hospital after a British warrior who lost his life in a war while defending his cou...

New RTI draft rules inspired by citizen-unfriendly, overtly bureaucratic approach

By Venkatesh Nayak* The Department of Personnel and Training , Government of India has invited comments on a new set of Draft Rules (available in English only) to implement The Right to Information Act, 2005 . The RTI Rules were last amended in 2012 after a long period of consultation with various stakeholders. The Government’s move to put the draft RTI Rules out for people’s comments and suggestions for change is a welcome continuation of the tradition of public consultation. Positive aspects of the Draft RTI Rules While 60-65% of the Draft RTI Rules repeat the content of the 2012 RTI Rules, some new aspects deserve appreciation as they clarify the manner of implementation of key provisions of the RTI Act. These are: Provisions for dealing with non-compliance of the orders and directives of the Central Information Commission (CIC) by public authorities- this was missing in the 2012 RTI Rules. Non-compliance is increasingly becoming a major problem- two of my non-compliance cases are...

Pairing not with law but with perpetrators: Pavlovian response to lynchings in India

By Vikash Narain Rai* Lynch-law owes its name to James Lynch, the legendary Warden of Galway, Ireland, who tried, condemned and executed his own son in 1493 for defrauding and killing strangers. But, today, what kind of a person will justify the lynching for any reason whatsoever? Will perhaps resemble the proverbial ‘wrong man to meet at wrong road at night!’

Dowry over duty: How material greed shattered a seven-year bond

By Archana Kumar*  This account does not seek to expose names or tarnish identities. Its purpose is not to cast blame, but to articulate—with dignity—the silent suffering of a woman who lived her life anchored in love, trust, and duty, only to be ultimately abandoned.